[digitalradio] band plans

2010-02-20 Thread wd4kpd
has anyone found a bandplan that includes the bw restrictions for the segments ? david/wd4kpd

[digitalradio] Band Plans and operating

2009-07-21 Thread Rick W
It is entirely reasonable that there could be world wide band plans as long as the bands overlap the same. Since this is not always possible, adjustments are made in such cases. But the bands are used in a dynamic fashion due to propagation and useage, particularly contests and operating

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-08 Thread larry allen
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans Larry; have you looked at our (Canadian) regulations lately? have they caused you a problem? John VE5MU - Original Message - From: larry allen To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 5:21 PM Subject: Re

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-08 Thread larry allen
would have if they deregulated the highway traffic act... Larry ve3fxq - Original Message - From: Andrew J. O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans - Original Message

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread John Bradley
nets which normally occupy 3725 to 3750, which will now be open to US ham SSB check-ins. My recommendation would be to fire all the lawyers on both the FCC and ARRL sides, and let some common sense prevail. John VE5MU Subject: [digitalradio] Band Plans The only way that this issue is going

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread Danny Douglas
- From: Joe Ivey To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:29 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Band Plans The only way that this issue is going to be solved is for the ITU to step in and set up band plans for each mode/bandwidth on each band more especially

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread KV9U
: [digitalradio] Band Plans The only way that this issue is going to be solved is for the ITU to step in and set up band plans for each mode/bandwidth on each band more especially on the HF bands. I am not sure how often the ITU meets, every 3-5 years. Every country should have a member

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
VE5MU Subject: [digitalradio] Band Plans The only way that this issue is going to be solved is for the ITU to step in and set up band plans for each mode/bandwidth on each band more especially on the HF bands. I am not sure how often the ITU meets, every 3-5 years. Every country should have

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread Joe Ivey
:17 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans And why would hams from outside the US want to do this? We just got rid a whole bunch of rules and regulations regarding band plans,emission types etc etc, and so far things are going well This would be a huge step backwards for the ITU

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread John Bradley
So why doesn't the US follow the most of rest of the world and deregulate the bands? that would be a move towards having the ham bands the same worldwide. I don't think the rest of the world is interested in yet more rulesmaybe it's because we don't have as many lawyers and lobbyists

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread Joe Ivey
. That way we could just turn all the hambands into an e-mail service. Joe - Original Message - From: John Bradley To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:29 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans So why doesn't the US follow the most

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread John Bradley
, December 07, 2006 3:42 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans John, That is a good thought. Just throw out all the rules and regs and let rip. Then you would have CB on all the bands. Most people only want rules and regs that suit themselves and not the rest of the everyone else

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread Joe Ivey
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans If you could deregulated the 80 meter band, where would you put what?... Eg where would you put the voice subband??. Larry ve3fxq - Original Message - From: John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread Joe Ivey
@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:42 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans John, That is a good thought. Just throw out all the rules and regs and let rip. Then you would have CB on all the bands. Most people only want rules and regs that suit themselves

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread Danny Douglas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: John Bradley To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 4:29 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans So why doesn't the US follow the most of rest of the world and deregulate the bands? that would

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread John Bradley
such as non commercial use etc would remain the same. John VE5MU - Original Message - From: larry allen To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 4:48 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans If you could deregulated the 80 meter band, where

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
- Original Message - From: Joe Ivey To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:04 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans If the ham bands were deregulated then anything goes. And just look at all the tax money we would save from not having to have

Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans

2006-12-07 Thread Joe Ivey
, December 07, 2006 9:02 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans - Original Message - From: Joe Ivey To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:04 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Band Plans If the ham bands were deregulated then anything goes