Something like this ...
https://www.changedetection.com/
ve3bdr
From: Ted Antanaitis
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 1:18 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: SDR Info request
Softrock receiver and transceiver kits are ordered from this web site:
http
Softrock receiver and transceiver kits are ordered from this web site:
http://www.kb9yig.com/
The kits sell fast when announced. Often tips when they will be
available are posted on the Softrock40 group. Or you could
use an automatic monitoring program to alert when the web
page changes.
Good
Where did you order it? tkx Dan kc2sta
Where did you order it? I have been going in circles on the web, seems to be
out of stock every where I found.
Thanks Dan kc2sta
If you are talking about the Softrock, you will NOT be able to find a place to
order it. What you need to do is join the Softrock Yahoo group, there the main
individual involved posts when he has a kit (or kits) for sale. They usually
sell in a few minutes to hours, then you wait until he has
Guess I better Google it to see just what
it is. Right now I have no clue.
It just sold...
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:02 PM, John Becker, WØJAB
w0...@big-river.netwrote:
Guess I better Google it to see just what
it is. Right now I have no clue.
www.rfspace.com
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:02:47
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: SDR-IQ for sale
Guess I better Google it to see just what
Patrick
Although the amount of RAM may not be critical (provided you're not paging),
the SPEED of the memory is probably the limiting factor. The summary is that in
a modern cpu with multiple cores and pre-fetch pipeline processing, the
processor can execute instructions faster than they can
(as in real
life).
Thanks for the explanations and the WEB addresses.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: jcprout jcpr...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 9:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: SDR-Radio with DM780 20M Digital Band
Patrick
Andy,
Patrick is way ahead of all of us.
I forgot to mention that when I first installed the E2180 dual core
cpu/motherboard it only had 500GB of memory. The digital mode and SDR
applications actually ran OK and the cpu usage was quite low but the memory
shortage was very obvious when
Hi Again Ed. I did play with the 3 VFO feature of Simon's software, see
http://www.obriensweb.com/3vfo20.jpg
http://www.obriensweb.com/3vfo.jpg (17M)
It is nice to be able to 'see the CW , digital, and phone portions, and
click back and forth to actually hear when needed.Thanks for
Ed:
With 500 GB of memory you should have no trouble running any program likely to
be produced in the next few years.
MixW can get a pretty good range of resolution. In the case of resolution,
looking at 20 m on MixW at a zoom factor of 0.5, the spread on the display is
14.070 through
Interesting comments, Andy.
My goal is also to be able to monitor all the digital portions of the band and
to be able to spot all call signs in any mode across the band. CW Skimmer is a
good model for that. In addition, it would nice to be able to select a few
segments of the band (~5
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:08 PM, ed_hekman ehek...@cox.net wrote:
Interesting comments, Andy.
My goal is also to be able to monitor all the digital portions of the band
and to be able to spot all call signs in any mode across the band. CW Skimmer
is a good model for that. In addition, it
Thanks Ed, I will have to take another look at their web page, looks
interesting.
Andy K3UK
On 9/7/09, ed_hekman ehek...@cox.net wrote:
Andy,
I built a Softrock RXTX V6.3 earlier this year. It does take some reading
to understand what is offered and what is required/available for each
Andy,
I built a Softrock RXTX V6.3 earlier this year. It does take some reading to
understand what is offered and what is required/available for each kit. It is
not really a business - the guys design the radios and offer the kits for
little more than the cost of the parts. I think it is
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
I read today that there is a 20/30 noard due from Softrock probably
in a bout 4 weeks time.
www.genesisradio.com.au
Andy K3UK
I should have said SDR , not softrock.
Hi Andy...been reading my mail on the logger :-)
had a e-mail from Nick of Genesis about 2 weeks ago and he said 4-6weeks
then
im hoping to get a board as soon as they come out
very interesting concept
73 David VK4BDJ
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Yes David :-), this is very interesting news. With JT65A and a
board, it could be very useful . I would then probably do a 24 hour
JT65A RB.
Andy
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 4:33 AM, David djm...@bigpond.com wrote:
Hi Andy...been reading my mail on the logger :-)
had a e-mail from Nick
hi to all in the group .. can any one tell me wer the white wire , or lead from
the usb on the main softrock v.9 .board can any one please tell me wer i
solder it to , as wen i was fitting it in a new box . it
came of aand i dont no wer to or wat pin to solder it back on thanks
If you had .deb for the Debian based and .rpm for the Red Hat based,
wouldn't that take care of most of them? Ideally, there should be a
radio amateur area in the universe for the Debian's at least. I am not
sure how it is maintained as it seems almost magical compared to hunting
around for MS
Maybe this is a dumb question, but once someone compiles a program for
Linux and includes the dependencies, wouldn't this be easily shared
between users?
Can't they then put this in their depository for that particular Linux
distribution?
Even if you don't have it in your particular universe
This is just what package managers do.
There are two main package managers: Debainls deb format and Red Hat's
RPM.
Debian historically did a better job on resolving dependencies at
installation time (as opppsed to just reporting them), but part of that
ability was due to Debian have a good
Maybe this is a dumb question, but once someone compiles a program for
Linux and includes the dependencies, wouldn't this be easily shared
between users?
Can't they then put this in their depository for that particular Linux
distribution?
Even if you don't have it in your particular
Very interesting and informative information, Leigh. I did not realize
how proprietary things were in the earlier times. The merging of the
ODSL (Open Source Development Labs) and the FSG (Free Standards Group)
into the Linux Foundation and the attempt to try and bring increased
I guess that has kinda been my thught also.
Walt/K5YFW
KV9U wrote:
Maybe this is a dumb question, but once someone compiles a program for
Linux and includes the dependencies, wouldn't this be easily shared
between users?
Can't they then put this in their depository for that particular
But that still doesn't preclude amateur radio operators from have a place to
store compiled applications for their distro.
There would of course have to be as many major directories as Linux distros and
sub directoried for the various releases of the distro. if the amateur radio
application
That would be a good reason to install Puppy but as I understand it, Puppy is
limited in that most don't consider it a full distribution.
Walt/K5YFW
kd4e wrote:
Maybe this is a dumb question, but once someone compiles a program for
Linux and includes the dependencies, wouldn't this be easily
If you get the things into the distribution, all these problems go
away. Hamish Moffat has laudably done this and is a package maintainer
for several programs. He does the work, and we all benefit. At least
all Debian users.
Personally I don't think all that AX25 stuff is all that useful,
-[Flexradio] Linux SDR TeamSpeak questions
Roger Rehr
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:21:03 -0800
Hi, All, I sent this to the linux-dttsp list and then realized that
not
everyone who was present for the EXCELLENT TeamSpeak last night is
necessarily subscribed to the linux-dttsp list.
I apologize for the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt DuBose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not going to spend $1500 for an SDR transceiver I can't run from
Linux.
Roger's website is the best source for information on getting started.
There will be new information forthcoming by the end of the weekend.
As
Thanks for the encouragement Frank.
For over 2 years now Gerald had been telling me that Oh yes the SDR-1000 was
going to be supported by Linux.
As I told Dave, W1HJK, in a private E-Mail and I was going to address Andy's
and
Roger Rehr's comment. For those of us who eun Linux either just
I pushed forward to a new repository (sdr_linux) today. Frank and I did
the dsp/sdr code and Eric Wachsman and Flex did just about 100% of the
hardware code in support of the SDR-1000. It runs on linux, cygwin on
MS and native on MS (using the MSVS 2005 express) and probably OSX. It
drives
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a multiway exchange, Gerald said
explicitly that Linux would be first out of the gate on any new radio
with an embedded micro for dsp/sdr in it...
...but that the embedded micro version would be a small-volume,
35 matches
Mail list logo
