Yes, Chris,
But that is only in the text data sub bands. The voice/image/fax areas
would allow it as long as it is a published protocol. Do you think that
it is unreasonable to have some kind of published protocol?
If it had the published protocol, would you be opposed to using it on
the HF
-
From: jhaynesatalumni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:40 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Gray Areas of Ham Radio Regulations and Rules
The cross-cultural part of this discussion reminded
me of a broadcast by the late Alistair Cooke. He
OK from a NON-DIGITAL Ham's view point.
EXPLORING / pushing the boundary's of radio are as old
as ham radio it's self. Now how do we do this if the
rules don't allow it? Good question
Do we break the law then after we prove it will work
apply for a rule change or go on until we get
OK, Brad,
What are your specific objections to any given rule that you think are
improper?
It seems to me that we have found different countries have different
rules and it can be very helpful to know what they are. As I recall, it
took years for your country to even allow Winlink 2000
with new technologies such as RFSM2400 without fear of
penalties, and this in turn would lead to better modes.
It seems to come down to a matter of trust and respect within the ham community
to be able to work with few regulations.
John
VE5MU
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Gray Areas of Ham Radio
There is really nothing that baffling when you consider that NZ and Oz
are so remote that even the lower HF bands are not often going to bother
the larger population areas that much.
But it works both ways.
The Canadians, who are immediately adjacent to the U.S., have in the
past had phone
kv9u writes:
What rule do you think is stopping U.S. hams from using RFSM2400 other
than if it is not yet posted with a technical description?
97.307(f)(3) ... The symbol rate may not exceed 300 bauds ...
That applies to all the cw,data subbands below 28 MHz. I wish it
were otherwise, but
OK, Brad,
What are your specific objections to any given rule that you think are
improper?
RFSM2400? You know the new mode that triggered this whole hand wringing
debate about whether USA hams could or could not use it?
300bd? Ha!
Images/Text/Images of text/fax? Ha!
It seems to
Wilco!
You're response has so much class and rationale.
Original Message Follows
From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Gray Areas of Ham Radio Regulations and Rules
Date: Sun, 18 Mar
