I think that is just fine, and a perfect example of
where and when something like Winlink could and should be used. Outside
the amateur bands. If the government wants hams to be involved in
emergency communications they should do the same: give us additional
(outside ham band)
From:
Danny Douglas
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:03
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army
MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network
I think that is just fine, and a perfect example
of where and when something like Wi
I totally disagree !
At 10:03 AM 3/3/06, you wrote:
I think that is just fine, and a perfect example of where and when
something like Winlink could and should be used. Outside the amateur
bands. If the government wants hams to be involved in emergency
communications they should do the same:
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000
with Airmail Network
I totally disagree !
At 10:03 AM 3/3/06, you wrote:
I think that is just fine, and a perfect example of where and when
something like Winlink could and should be used. Outside the amateur
bands
Everything in blue.
And just why do you think it should be used
outside of the ham bands? Got something against
traffic handling?
At 11:39 AM 3/3/06, you wrote:
You totally disagree with
what? Both that it is a good mode to use
Outside
our bands, or that is
should be used outside and not
for practice.
- Original Message -
From:
John Becker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 12:53
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army
MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network
Everything in blue.And just why do you think
