Hi Bonnie, i saw in the first place of that list: Chip 64 explaining
clearly that Chip 64 is Spread Spectrum.
Then, what have to say ARRL about it ? They are publishing a SS in his own
officcial website. Somebody can explain me what happen here?
De:
think I lost your id number in icq... clicked to fast...
73
Wolfgang, dl7nb
www.dx-buddy.net
Am 25.02.2010 um 00:30 schrieb jose alberto nieto ros:
Hi Bonnie, i saw in the first place of that list: Chip 64 explaining
clearly that Chip 64 is Spread Spectrum.
Then, what have to say
I don't understand what you say?
De: Wolfgang dl7nb dl...@gmx.de
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 00:40
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] Is ROS Documentation Published?
think I lost your id number in icq... clicked to fast...
73
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Is ROS Documentation Published?
Hi Bonnie, i saw in the first place of that list: Chip 64 explaining clearly
that Chip 64 is Spread Spectrum.
Then, what have to say ARRL about it ? They are publishing a SS in his own
officcial website. Somebody can explain me
And ROS is legal because is not a SS modulation.
De: John B. Stephensen kd6...@comcast.net
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 00:47
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] Is ROS Documentation Published?
CHIP64 is legal above 222 MHz
febrero, 2010 00:40
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] Is ROS Documentation Published?
think I lost your id number in icq... clicked to fast...
73
Wolfgang, dl7nb
www.dx-buddy. net
Am 25.02.2010 um 00:30 schrieb jose alberto nieto ros:
Hi Bonnie, i saw in the first place of that list: Chip 64
://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=rules_and_regulations).
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: jose alberto nieto ros
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 23:52 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Is ROS Documentation Published?
And ROS
