- Original Message -
From: f6cte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, you can directly use the code without understand it but it is
not the way I do because it is without interest.
One main reason why PSK became so popular was that source code was made
available early on. Many have implemented
There is so much work involved in writing a fool-proof program with a good
user interface that having to also write the encoding / decoding interface
would make sure projects unfeasible for a single programmer who codes in his
spare time.
Simon HB9DRV
I can second that :)
Rein
Mark Thompson wrote:
Digital Radio Century Club JT65A New Years Crawl
Updated rules and new operating times below...
--
Default
Hi Jack,
In the later part of the message I mentioned that with the last station,
we tried another mode and I suggested DEX 4 (Domino EX 4 baud) which we
went to as a comparison. It is quite slow compared to the speed of FAE
400 but it performed moderately well but with some hits on my end.
Elaine and I had some attempts to work each other the past few days as I
heard her on the bands but we were always quite weak to each other. If
we had been using Pactor modems, especially those from non SCS
manufacturers, I doubt that we would have had any luck connecting.
We did have a small
I will add that I was monitoring Keyboard to Keyboard Pactor the other
night on both the main rig using a soundcard and MixW with Inverted VEE up
around 35 feet with ends around 10 feet, using Kenwood TS 2000, while also
monitoring same QSO with Portable station using SCS controller and
That is what I would like to do - use pskmail as an internet gateway for an
AX25 network on VHF with a TNC like my KAM+. Do I understand that this might
not be a big deal?
If you also wanted to add the afsk modem, perhaps it might be helpful to
examine the source code (in C) for Thomas
Hello Rick and John,
when to use ALE 400 and when to use FAE 400. Personally, I would
rather
I see this as in ALE (but I'm not a specialist): you can do soundings
or calls (QRZ for example) to say notify your presence in the band
and after the link with a Ham, you both begin exchanging
Rick,
RR for all the experimentation done.
with the typing speed. Since you can not backspace for an error
(similar to RTTY) I do tend to make some xxx characters at times
As, some time ago, you pointed out this issue, I fixed it in the very
last version of Multipsk. Now you can use backspace
Hello Simon,
There is so much work involved in writing a fool-proof program with
a good user interface that having to also write the encoding /
decoding interface
RR for all. Yes I understand and it's true that detailed
specifications + source code as Peter have done with PSK31 was the
CQing on 14.0755 Pactor ARQ FWIW... de Nick KU2A FN42dw
- Original Message -
From: Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
Elaine and I had some attempts to work each other the past few days as I
heard her on
Nick wrote:
CQing on 14.0755 Pactor ARQ FWIW... de Nick KU2A FN42dw
How does one CQ in Pactor ARQ?
de Roger W6VZV
You don't, you would use either Pactor-1 FEC or RTTY to call CQ first.
73 Sholto
KE7HPV.
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD
SHEESH! Apologies to All... looks like a bit of operator error
is apparent with the message below. I was editing a reply and
probably pushed the wrong switch as I got up to take care of
a chore. Sorry for the trash being sent.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
- Original Message -
From:
Sholto Fisher wrote:
You don't, you would use either Pactor-1 FEC or RTTY to call CQ
first.
Yes, I know. That was my point. I haven't heard a Pactor FEC signal in
3 or 4 years.
de Roger W6VZV
You know I head a Pactor-1 FEC call around 14,061 a couple days ago but I
don't have my PK-232 anymore so couldn't reply. I wonder if it was someone
in this group?
73 Sholto
KE7HPV.
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
Sholto Fisher wrote:
You know I head a Pactor-1 FEC call around 14,061 a couple days ago
but I don't have my PK-232 anymore so couldn't reply. I wonder if it
was someone in this group?
73 Sholto KE7HPV.
I might be wrong but I think that MixW can parse Pactor1 FEC.
de Roger W6VZV
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CQing on 14.0755 Pactor ARQ FWIW... de Nick KU2A FN42dw
Hi Nick,
I can be QRV tomorrow (1/1/08) between 14 and 16 UTC on that frequency
if you wish. The MUF will be around 16-17 MHZ during these times so we
should be OK.
Is
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
I was active on the TNC modes, i.e. Amtor, Pactor, RTTY for a lot of
Ham radio is supposed to do both. One of my ham neighbors in LA checked into an
80 meter AM net almost every night with the same model rig that he used in the
1950's.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: W2XJ
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December
I think I have the most current version. It apparently does not work
like say PSK31 as it did not seem to remove the error, but from now one
I will backspace and just assumer that it is being taken care of, HIHI
73,
Rick, KV9U
f6cte wrote:
Rick,
RR for all the experimentation done.
Howard,
I've read where the thinking is that most hams won't bother with the
PACTOR I if only because of little desire to buy an expensive outboard
TNC. What about the hams who never threw away their original TNC,
the one sitting in the closet per se?
I've often wondered the same thing.
OK congrats on the technicality but my point was looking for ARQ
response. If someone replies FEC with a soundcard I'll answer.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick wrote:
CQing on 14.0755 Pactor ARQ FWIW... de Nick KU2A FN42dw
How does
Are you saying that DEX works better than other modes? Or about the same?
I did quite a bit of NVIS testing of DEX/FEC11 and other speeds too as
my hope was that this would work better than any other sound card mode.
But it just did not work out that way as we found other modes to work
about
Hi Demetre
That would be 14.0755 center freq AFSK. I am terrible with schedules
due to commitments but will try to call CQ at times between 14 and 16z
on 1/1/08. My 20m antenna at present is a G5RV and there is a hill in
the direction of EU. We are in this QTH for another 3 months then
will be
What is the standard rule for sidebands for the digital modes? Are all
bands 160-6 USB (for RTTY, PSK, WSJT, etc)? I have been looking for
this info but have not found it. A web link would be very helpful!
Thanks
Zack
N8FNR
Good one Andy! I like your sense of humor.
Tom
VE6WCF
- Original Message
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 9:04:04 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Bozo's guide to RM-11392
OK, I am coming to this issue rather late
Mark, I have tried to contact you privately (a couple of weeks ago)
about forwarding or reposting old messages to this group. I did not
receive a reply. I wonder if you are confused about which Yahoogroup
you are sending to?
In the the message below, you appear to have re-posted a message
--- Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the standard rule for sidebands for the
digital modes? Are all
bands 160-6 USB (for RTTY, PSK, WSJT, etc)? I have
been looking for
this info but have not found it. A web link would be
very helpful!
Thanks
Zack
N8FNR
RTTY in the ham bands
Ralph Mowery wrote:
--- Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the standard rule for sidebands for the
digital modes? Are all
bands 160-6 USB (for RTTY, PSK, WSJT, etc)? I have
been looking for
this info but have not found it. A web link would be
very helpful!
Thanks
Zack
N8FNR
Thanks for the replies. I thought that there wa something different
about RTTY.
Zack
\--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Kevin O'Rorke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ralph Mowery wrote:
--- Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the standard rule for sidebands for the
digital modes?
Well now I need to go and read up on this mode agin, I
didn't know where I was Txing. Is there a newer
version I'm running 5.9.6.R309
Russell NC5O/qrp
=
IN GOD WE TRUST !
=
Russell Blair NC5O
Skype-Russell Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
Historically RTTY operated on LSB. Newer sound card modes are mostly
using USB, so the developers of the sound card programs usually have
written them so that you operate your rig on USB for everything and the
program takes care of the translation. You will find that if the other
ham has their
I have 5.9.7 r383
Jim
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Russell Blair
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well now I need to go and read up on this mode agin, I
didn't know where I was Txing. Is there a newer
version I'm running 5.9.6.R309
Russell NC5O/qrp
=
IN GOD WE
At 05:28 PM 31/12/2007,Roger wrote:
I was active on the TNC modes, i.e. Amtor, Pactor, RTTY for a lot of
years, roughly 1989-2003 or so. Pactor was quite popular until the
early 2000s, when PSK31 was introduced by Peter Martinez. This ushered
in an age of narrow-frequency soundcard modes, which
Dear Rodney
You are wrong. You know laws/regulations, but ham-robots dont.
Ham-robots have strong mantra - emergency. And strong mission - helping
people.
What you and other ham-humans have against this rhetoric?
Ham-humans need better rhetoric against ham-robots. Like this:
Mantra for
Jim Tnx I will try to find that one, where do you get
that one.
Tnx Russell NC5O
--- we2s_jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 5.9.7 r383
Jim
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Russell Blair
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well now I need to go and read up on this mode
agin, I
didn't
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jack Chomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still use a TNC for PSK31, IF I want to run a minimalist station,
without a laptop ;-)
The SCS PTC-IIex has PSK31 built in that allows me to use a hand held
battery powered dumb terminal on it, or my Psion 3MX
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Zack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the replies. I thought that there wa something different
about RTTY.
Zack
Hi Zak,
For RTTY whoever uses the American Tones (Mark 2125Hz - Space 2295Hz)
always uses LSB, whereus if you used the European Tones
Good list Andy.
Best wishes for a Happy New Year!
73,
Barry VE3CDX/W7
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 6:52 PM
To: DIGITALRADIO
Subject: [digitalradio] Announcing The 4th Annual (2007)
Hello Andy Users:
On behalf of TARA I've got to say I'm elated to read TARA's Melee Contest
received an award, a Prestigious Award at that from K3UK The Digital Radio
News Group. TARA really does work hard at trying to add something to this
hobby and to have a group such as this
Yes for receive. Also, MultiPSK can also receive and transmit Pactor I
FEC.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sholto Fisher wrote:
You know I head a Pactor-1 FEC call around 14,061 a couple days ago
but I don't have my
Ok, I misunderstood your first email. My bad!
I AGREE with you on this one!!!
Rod
Jaak Hohensee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear
Rodney
You are wrong. You know laws/regulations, but ham-robots dont.
Ham-robots have strong mantra - emergency. And strong
44 matches
Mail list logo
