[digitalradio] Hop, skip and jump away ... powerful, ALE implementation that would outperform MIL-STD-188-141A ?

2009-07-25 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Regarding this message below, from the RS-ID thread, can someone elaborate ? What lightweight ALE implementation ? Andy K3UK You know what's really exciting? We are a hop, skip and jump away from a powerful, lightweight ALE implementation that would probably outperform MIL-STD-188-141A by a

[digitalradio] Addonics converter: Zapped PCs, data recovery, and Windows !

2009-07-25 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Thanks Dave, they must be popular... they are out of stock of the $59.00 model I am interested in. Andy K3UK On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Dave AA6YQ aa...@ambersoft.com wrote: Addonics makes a product that lets you convert any IDE drive into an external USB drive. Access via USB is

Re: [digitalradio] Hop, skip and jump away ... powerful, ALE implementation that would outperform MIL-STD-188-141A ?

2009-07-25 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Andy, My interpretation of this mail is the following: If the heart of the ALE is the following handshaking protocol: * Sounding (the Ham sends his/her call sign): THIS IS A, * Response of the other Ham (by sending his/her call sign): A TO B, * Acknowledgment of the first Ham: B TO A I

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-25 Thread Charles Brabham
This is interesting in light of all the claims by WinLink and ALE aficianados that that comprehensive signal-detection is 'impossible'. 73 DE Charles, N5PVL - Original Message - From: Ed Hekman To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 3:30 AM Subject:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-25 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
FWIW SSTV has been using VIS (slightly similar) for ~ 10 years or so, maybe more. Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com - Original Message - From: Charles Brabham This is interesting in light of all the claims by WinLink and ALE aficianados that that comprehensive

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-25 Thread Alan Barrow
Charles Brabham wrote: This is interesting in light of all the claims by WinLink and ALE aficianados that that comprehensive signal-detection is 'impossible'. Painting with an awfully wide brush, there. :-) You won't find most of the ALE folks I run with saying it's impossible. Just not

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Zapped PCs, data recovery, and Windows !

2009-07-25 Thread Brent Gourley
my computer backs up data online to fabrik.com every day. I do have mypics etc on an external drive, because original drive not big enough. Brent KE4MZ _ From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009

Re: [digitalradio] Re: More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-25 Thread Jose A. Amador
The difference here is that a helper signal has been added, same as with SSTV, but which is only sent at the start of the transmission. That is essentially different from the raw, bare signal with no ID. A new situation, to be fair. 73, Jose, CO2JA Simon (HB9DRV) escribió: FWIW SSTV has