Yeah. But, for instance, Baudot, is simply what we know as RTTY. 5 level
code, older than the hills. Wonder how many others are misnamed. HI,
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date:
I guess the question is What are the PSK frequencies you are speaking
about? The usual PSK freqs you see listed, such as on 20 meters, are
14.069 and 14.070. and 14.071. A dozen or more PSK stations can normally be
heard within each 1 kc of that spectrum, and more during peak periods. One
FSK
Even when I used the TNCs , I didnt used AMTOR or PACTOR. So, havent lost
anything there. I seem to be able to copy many more signals now, than when
I was using them too, mainly becuase there are many more signals there. The
sound card programs have opened up the world of digital to most hams,
The frequency spotted should equate to the freq that the users will show on
their waterfall, not that shown on their rig. For instance I have seen far
too many PSK spots for 14.070 and when I click on them, my send arrow on
the waterfall sits right on that freq, and there is nothing there on the
That how I believe it should be done Andy. Just announce the correct spot,
that will show up on the waterfall. Those with CAT control thus will
immediately be at the right place. In my case, the rig would go to 14.070,
and then the signal on the waterfall would automatically be at 14.0715.
Forward error correction cannot correct spelling, or mistyping.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a
Ive done that. Mine drops off the first 500-600 cycles, then jumps up
for a KC or so, then drops down again at the high end. Use a fairly wide
filter (the one that was supplied) , and keep the dsp slope of the TS570
fairly wide too.
Using a test similar to what you stated, I have been
Yes, but when I click on that spot, the transceiver goes to 14.070 and that
IS NOT where the signal shows on the waterfall.
It means people have to click, search, click, versus a simple click. Some
software also doesnt even give the exact freqs across the screen, so people
have to figure all
Look lup National Bureau of Standards web site,
whole story is there.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a href="" href="http://dxcluster.blogspot.com">http://dxcluster.blogspot.comimg src=""
I collect these nice shiny discs by the dozens and
hang them in my cherry trees in the spring. I have tried everything to
keep the darn birds out of the trees, and these work better than every thing
else, including nets, plastic snakes, owls etc. I also took a
few into a Scout meeting
If something comes in the mail, I simply scratch my
name address etc. and point an arrow to the return I
to I tooaddress, and let them pay for it. I too
quickly dissappear from mailing lists.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a href=""
I think its not the regular CD dics he made the dial from. It was the clear
plastic disc that is used as a separator between discs (anti scratch) in the
packs. I just saw that page a couple of days ago, but cannot remember
where.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
I too have been thru a number of programs, seeming
to stick near MixW for most operating though, and just now getting into using it
as a voice keyer as well as having used almost all the other modes . I do
like the DXLab suite also, and used WinWarbler from time to time, but
mostly I love
Right now it is OK to transmit digital voice on voice channels and yet you
can not transmit digital data AND voice on voice channels. Even emergency
data
We may transmit any mode on any frequency under emergency conditions. We
may NOT transmit on those unassigned modes/freqs if it is NOT an
Yes, Mark. While sitting here, it suddenly started decoding, as a BBS in
Mo. Very strong signals after the frist few minutes, and could hear several
stations on the freq. The main signal is wider than the marks on the
waterfall, so thought it must be another mode. Sent my call in a few times,
Guys, the majority of us here on digitalradio have no idea what you are
talking about, not being programmers. My only programming was more years
than I care to think about ago, and was simple BASIC back around 1980.By
now, we know who is interested and who isnt, by who keeps responding to
I used (and still hold on to) a MFJ 1278B multi mode controller that also
runs Pactor/Amtor/Packet/RTTY/Fax/WeFax etc. The problem of course that all
of these units came out before we had all these sound card modes. I do have
(somewhere) a update fix to add a switch and couple of other parts,
Right off the bat, I suggest you give others
(including when spotting) the exact freq they will see on the waterfall, and not
the freq which shows on your rigs readout. It really gets confusing for
folk to spot something on 14.071 , 14.070, 14.069 etc. since when we
click on that spot,
I too used it for a couple of years, on and off,
and ocassionally someone said I had "audio" on my tones. HI.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go
OK Thanks. The one worry is that it runson
all sorts of operating systems. but doesnt list Win 2000.
Got it downloaded and will try anyway.
Danny
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
To
I have had several people tell me, via email, that it doesnt matter how much
power you use , as long as your signal is clean. So, yes, here we go again.
I start off with 20 watts, and if the other stations dont come back, I move
slowly (5 watts at a time) up to 40 or even 50 watts(if DX I need).
Listening to CY9SS on 1.828 and there is a rough
sounding tone continually coming on to of him. Its 300 cy wide.
Three second tone, then about 5 seconds of silence, then tone then silence
etc. Anyone know what it is? Appears to be purposely QRMing the
CY9.
Danny
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES
OK Thanks info. I did work CY9SS on 30 mtr RTTY, but havent heard em on PSK
at all.
Between this expedition and former, I only need them on 10 meters, and then
on 160 SSB. Right now I hear them
on 160 cw, which have already got. That tone would run me nuts if I were
trying them now. Dont know
Go straight to LogBook of the World. ARRL. If
you are just starting out, and have electronic logs it will be simple to upload
them to LOTW. Completely free, until you choose to buy "verifications" to
use in their awards program (DXCC now) with WAS etc. to follow along
shortly.
eQSLO is
You got it exactly. The higher the speed, the
wider the bandwidth.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Craft hobby
I recommend that any computer you get , NOT have
W98, or ME on them. Get W2000 or XP, and if the computer will not handle
those operating systems, dont purchase it. I had an old 400MHZ machine
that was on 98 when purchased new, and I updated it to W2000 Pro, and it handled
it quite well,
Frankly I am pretty much unfamilar with laptops
except for the ones we have in colloege here which are all Gateways. I
dont like laptops in general due to they have only one, or sometimes none
serial ports for digital ham use. They mostly have gone to usb ports and I
have not used one of
Which brings it to mind that half the spots I see for PSK are not correct.
If you see a spot and click on it, your transceiver should NOT wind up on
that freq, but on a freq such that the waterfall marker winds up on the
exact position of the spotted station. In other words, if the waterfall
Ron, please do not give up on LOTW. It is the only electrical logbook that
can be used for DXCC, and will soon be good for WAS and other awards. eQSL
will not now, or probably ever, be accepted for those particular awards.
You already have you logs in electronic form, you apparently have the
OK Im there
Original Message -
From:
Andrew J.
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 2:47
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] SSTV
Anyone?
14233 ?
- Original Message -
From:
Danny
I personally dont think its a good idea to use
something as widebanded as Olivia as a beacon, unless you use it as its very
narrowest bandwidth, and even then it will be wider than the CW beacons
presently heard.
It might indeed be interesting to see how well one
makes it thru, under
Thanks for the heads up. I have just gone
back and asked what the completed project price is. Im not sure I can now
even see well enough to do the larger parts. It would allow me to use this
on lmy IC706, keeping the computer and rigblaster connected to the TS570s and
use both at the same
I listened immediately when saw the spot.
Heard very faint signal on freq, and couldnt copy it. Think its the first
Olivia signal I havent been able to copy.
- Original Message -
From:
KT2Q
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 7:22
PM
One of them should have also been " I dont plan
anything - my cable company is taking care of it", thus I didnt respond at
all.
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:09
PM
Subject: RE:
Come on down Andy. We will make a day/weekend
out of it. I have never really run in a uhf/vhf contest for real.
Just play with contacts in the past events. Getting a few 6 or 2 meter
QSOs. Havent even attempted 440, though my lil 706 has it.
Danny
- Original Message -
Title: Message
Hmmm I thought that was already part of the
rules. If you dont listen, and transmit and intefere, that IS against the
rules.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 5:00
PM
Subject: RE:
I like the second one, except it is also straight
key night, which I always try to enjoy with the old hand key. I guess for
the new folk, it would be OK, since the majority probably dont even have a
straight key.
As the the Christmas day thing, nope. Its
normally a day off from radio for
Its only disabling from the beginning. If you
have a clear channel and start up, then someone else comes up, it is your
freq. Personally, it is the ONLY way to fly with auto or semi auto
operations. There are just already too many of these auto signals poppiing
up on top of ongoing QSOs.
Hmmm the url comes up in ie with
an address "about:blank" and just sits there with a blank page.
Danny
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew J.
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 12:31
PM
Subject: [digitalradio] New MixW
I did now, and am in.
Thanks
Danny
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew J.
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 2:55
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New MixW
reflector
Did u try
Since I have an IC706mk2g I was wondering how to go
about getting onATV on 70cm? Are there computer programs that use
the sound card to transmit this mode? Have actually only seenATV one
time: at the National Scout Jamboree back in 85, and wasnt involved in its
operation. I live here near
I had just found and was looking at that site a few
minutes ago, and indeed it is a good overview of what is needed. Looks
like a 706 wont work because of the bandwidth, so im outta here on that
one. I would have thought that some kind digital expert would come up with
something to run
- Original Message -
From:
Danny Douglas
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 9:02
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] atv?
I had just found and was looking at that site a
few minutes ago, and indeed it is a good overview of what
I agree, there is absolutely no reason at all to have such a wide signal on
our bands. And yes, we must have bandwidth available for more than a few
signals at a time. After all there are hundreds of thosuands of hams
worldwide. And if such a signal actually provides channelization , thus the
Hey, even without an OS - it could be a
bargin.You can pick up Win 2000for a song today. But I
would almost bet it doesnt have a DB9 connector.
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew J.
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 9:53
I think what you will find is that right now, most foreign hams are NOT
confined to modes within a particular sub-band. At least when I was
overseas the locals were anywhere they wanted to be with whatever modes were
available. Maddening when I was trying to work the states within stateside
I would disagree with one pont. It is only
one point of view that the band plan up there is working. I cant count the
times that I or someone else was on CW working another station in the states, or
even DX, whenone, or both of us wereQRMd by someone up there,
working SSB. The whole
"Again... you conveniently forget that the
Amateur Bands are used World Wide.. the US Regulations only restrict US
Amateurs.. while the rest of the world is free to innovate...and use the
allocations... so keeping restrictions on US while the rest of the world does
not have them makes
Will try this one more time. Im really tired
of yahoo messages saying they are bounced when Im sitting here reading mail from
others.
- Original Message -
From: Danny Douglas
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 2:15 PM
Subject: Fw: [digitalradio
So would l but willl never happen.Too many kilowat plusses out there
already, and Kenwood, Yaesu, Icom, and the rest would have a fit. England
used to have a 400 watt input limit, thats back when I won the first place
40 meter phone there, with 100 watts and a dipole. Im sitting here with 100
May I ask just how removing the telegraphy
licensing barrier will go a long way to reducing the burden on the FCC?
They don't write the test, they don't give the test and they don't score the
test. I am starting to feel that people simply don't like "rules to live
by" and it has nothing
I agree 100 percent. Few if any amateurs are going to ever need any such
communications, except during an emergency. If we don't need it, we are not
going to spend money on it, and we are not going to invite its use on OUR
bands when there is no emergency. If they need and want a trained corps
I had some problem with Mixw, and had to reload
here, and when went to the site, I cannot get the version 2.15 dual channel to
work. I keep getting an alarm flash that something is missing. I
thought I was using version 2.17 before, but dont find it here on the normal
site. Where is it?
If you are not a member, and dont vote--- then you have just voted in the
present administration. That includes our US Congress, President and the
ARRL Board. We need more members. More members mean a wider spread of
thought about different subjects, and the possibility to move the currrent
I too believe that the ARRL needs to come forward
with a band-plan. After all, if I want to sell something, I have to not
only advertise it, but show what it will do and why, plus demonstrate to the
customer why he needs to accept it. Same here. If they want to go to
a bandwidth
What you say is also true for our elected officials from the dog catcher up
the the president. A small minority is even registered to vote, and we
often struggle to get 20 - 40 percent of them to vote at that.
I say again: If you dont vote, you have just voted for those who won.
-
I guess one queston is: Where does it have to be published? If its already
in use, and published in a foreign country, thats published.
- Original Message -
From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:08 PM
Subject:
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Calling all experimenters ( A Proposal)
THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPED OVER THE LAZY DOGS BACK
1234567890
RYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRY
Adds the character S to the mix, and thus transmits
every letter in the English alphabet. The RY string was
OK Now move to some country I havent worked 160 on. I am not hearing any
digital siganls from very many DX stations.
Danny
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Giella KN4LF [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: a psk31 eGroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]; a PSK31 070 eGroup
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; a Oliviadata eGroup
One simple look at their band plan for 160 shows they havent updated it in
decades. We no longer need to have ssb down in the bottom half of that
band. That was done in order to allow oprators to work around the shared
band with military and commerical interests. We waste 150 KC most of the
Who has? Certainly not digital voice?
- Original Message -
From: John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FYI: RESTRUCTURING: UK GETS NEW BANDPLANS IN
2006
they have been hanging out on
Well Iv e tried
sh dx
sh/dx
sh/dx all
sh/dx/160
sh/dx1.8
and every one of them tell me Im wrong. I give up
- Original Message -
From: John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FYI:
Neer mind, finally figured it out sh/dx 160 works Its been a long time
since I used a packet cluster
Danny
- Original Message -
From: John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FYI:
Trying to think how to handle that Andy, and I would simply cut around (not
through) the monitors cable at the far end, remove one pin at a time and
move that wire over to a new connector. You should be able to do that one
at a time, looking where the old pin was, and mathcing with the new one.
I Believe that your are very correct in that being one of the major problems
with newbies (and some oldbies as well). Peronally, I have checked my own
soundcards and find that I must set them around 1000 HZ, as if I get up as
high as 1500cy, they no longer work with full output.
I did a test with
Sorry Bonnie, Im with him. My operating priviliges are listed on a chart on
my wall here. I dont see any place I cant go within the ham bands. Thats
why I worked and earned the Extra license. If I find a clear frequency, ask
twice if anyone is using it, and no one shows up, its mine until I
Nope- if they are there I go elsewhere. I expect others to do the same. But
I cannot begin to count the times I have been there in a QSO when something
I couldnt copy came up on top of us and ruined it.
They can work on my freq all day, as long as I cant hear them and they
dont interupt my
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:21 pm, Danny Douglas wrote:
Good grief, the news is still delivered by TTY? I spent many years
overseas, at awful locations, and as an aside, copied Rueters, AP or
UPI and
put the copies out in the hall for walkers-by to pick up and read, We
didnt
have English
radio is an **experimental service**. That means we experiment.
If you want commercial situations, then go to commercial bands.
Ken
On 1 Jan 2006 21:47:05 -, digitalradio@yahoogroups.com wrote:
From: Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: : Why Olivia 14101-14112kHz USA Automatic Sub
.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Meanwhile, if we have
ham bands that are on our lists, we shouldnt have to avoid empty
frequencies
because someone MAY come up there.
But you
I give up. What is G mail?
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew J.
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:56
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Gmail
invitation?
Jose , Harv and Francisco each sent me an
invitation but
OK But what time is that in Zulu, dont see a start time here or the rules,
or I just missed it.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 4:00 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] 1-hr Sprint
Where is your audio input going in to the rig? Do you have the rig set for
VOX? I used the same Lil Rascal intgerface when first started with
digital modes via sound cards, and had no problem at all with it.
Danny
- Original Message -
From: kg4bir59 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Yet, hundreds of Boy Scouts do exactly that, during every Jamboree, Because
its a FUN thing for them to do.
- Original Message -
From: jhaynesatalumni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 8:52 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: NTS and traffic
I really wonder if we are thinking in the same terms anymore. It seems to
me that hams need to fill in the space where there exists no other
communications, much as we have done in the past. Local emergencies such as
tornados, floods, landslides etc, knock out local communications from the
very
- Original Message -
From:
LELAND
ZANTESON
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:58
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS and
traffic handling and digital
Correct on the vulnerability of satellites. The Soviet military
Andy what is suposed to happen. I get the
black telenet.ext window come up then suddenly a blank ms internet explorer
page, and there it sits.
Danny
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006
Nope, get same thing. nice blank screen. l
- Original Message -
From: obrienaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 8:30 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] need cluster testers
If you have a chance to try connecting to
If its on 7.088 it is illegal in any region or
country that are members of the ITU. Its quite possible its a multiple of
another freq which has gotten out of hand and is transmitting out of band.
Indeed, call the FCC and report such signals. I have done so many times in
the past and
and digital
never hear RTTY there, always just pactor...
and usually P3
- Original Message -
From:
Danny Douglas
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 8:44
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS and
traffic handling
It can legally go up to 14150, but anything above
that is for voice,cw and image only.
- Original Message -
From:
Ross
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:34
AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia
frequencies
Hi all,
with
] Olivia
frequencies
The only problem I have is that 14140 is the
Canadian 20M SSB call frequency, and there are SSB QSO's down to about 14125
often
- Original Message -
From:
Danny Douglas
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17
Yes - It puts the PSK and the CW in the same place. Psk can copy right up
to the edge of the CW, but it doesnt work the opposite directiion, unless
one has extremely narrow filters, and even with my 250 cy filter, I can hear
PSK that close. I hope they intend to have sub bands for psk within
My question exactly! I see no reason for any AMATEUR radio traffic to move
across the bands, without someone setting there watching it. After all we
are suppose to be communicating with each other, not broadcasting to the
rest of the world. We can watch, then relay. Im sure the FCC has some
I have an RV and a canoe. That doesnt make me rich either. The canoe is
plastic, and the RV is a 78. The RV runs (when it does run) with 2 meters
in it. The canoe runs with one adult and one kid, no radios as they are not
waterproof, as the adult and kid are, and are frequently dumped.
Danny
I just lost a QSO with 6O0N due to some trash
coming up on 7.0637 thru 7.0644. Can anyone identify what that junk
is? Perfect example of SSB and Digital modes on same freq, not
compatable.
Danny Douglas N7DCex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR
ET3USASV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
Need a Digital mode
to some trash coming up on 7.0637 thru
7.0644. Can anyone identify what that junk is? Perfect example of SSB
and Digital modes on same freq, not compatable.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet
Its time to report them to your DOT or whomever it
is up there now. Complain loudly and often. They are not allowed
those freqs, and if no one complains they will continue to cause QRM. They
might also wind up like the Japanese fleet did off Washington state back around
65. They were spot
I cant really understand why everyone except
Americans thinks the present situation works. I have lived and operated
from numerous countries and heard and suffered consequences of the different
band plans with different countries. Lets take 40 meters, as an extreme
example. Stateside
Attach both to your computer and you can see a big difference. I installed
several in the college rooms, and they are used for both TV and computer
monitors. They are NOT worth the multi K dollars they cost. 3 Years ago
you couldnt touch a 42 inch screen for less than 10-15 grand, today they
Put in a software that handles all three, for instance the DXLab suite of
software contains WinWarbler that will handle all that, plus do CW and Voice
keying. Great number of users who are very helpful in getting newbies, and
some of us oldies straightened out in how to use it. The author is
YES - IT IS A PROBLEM
- Original Message -
From: Tim Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 11:41 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ARRL proposal removes baud rate limitations on HF
Is anyone else on here concerned that the ARRL bandwidth
OHHH that is what has been QRMing the SSTV up there?
- Original Message -
From: John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digital voice on HF
I got to laugh at some of the post on this subject.
Assuming this has to do with the ARRL request for subbands by signal width? Before I can write anything I do need to read it again. Think it would be appropriate to have a URL so we can do that.
Dan Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX WA5UKR ET2US ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
On Sat Feb 4 3:37
I think most members are not going to be all that upset with what is in
effect a shrinking of the CW exclusive subbands (although they could be
used for other narrow band modes such as PSK31 and maybe some others
that have not been invented yet to fit in that size of bandwidth), a
shrinking of the
John, what are you using to do this. Can all of us do it, with simple
equipment/software? Thats where we need to go. I dont want to spend (and
cant) hundreds or thousands of dollars to speak with a few well heeled
individuals, but am more than willing to jump in for a few bucks (or even
less -
Those answer my questions. It is NOT cheap, not readily available for me
to use in my computer with already owned equipments. Let me know when it
is.
Danny
- Original Message -
From: Michael Keane K1MK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006
OK John. I had looked at the ads and read up on that before, and
immediately forgot it. The 500 bucks would go a long way toward
a new, shiney, taller tower, which mama wont let me buy anyway. Hi.
Danny
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of
Since most, if not all Central and South American countries have no
subbands, they go where they want, when they want. Our SSB moving down any
bit at all, with simply cause them to come down below, and into the
CW/digital bands, to talk to each other and/or make DX contacts away from
our QRM/
I dont think anyone has said that band plans, just because they are
different than ours, are wrong. What has been said is that having different
band plans can lead to difficulties for one or the other, or both. If your
band plan allows your operators to work modes on frequencies where anothers
1 - 100 of 408 matches
Mail list logo
