Re: [digitalradio] More on ALE 400 FAE

2009-05-29 Thread Patrick Lindecker
73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com To: digitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:56 AM Subject: [digitalradio] More on ALE 400 FAE First, is it really ALE as used currently? I am not sure that the recent tests

[digitalradio] More on ALE 400 FAE

2009-05-28 Thread Andy obrien
First, is it really ALE as used currently? I am not sure that the recent tests of this mode have actually used it in the form of establishing an automatic link. I know it can be used this way , but do not see this. If it is not really ALE, what should it be called ? Second, the performance of

Re: [digitalradio] More on ALE 400 FAE

2009-05-28 Thread Tony
Andy, First, is it really ALE as used currently? I am not sure that the recent tests of this mode have actually used it in the form of establishing an automatic link. I haven't Andy. I think it would be put to better use as an ARQ chat mode. Tony -K2MO

Re: [digitalradio] More on ALE 400 FAE

2009-05-28 Thread Rick W
Andy, The FAE modes are not really all that new. I had promoted it back in July 2007 on one of the eham forums when I asked if other public service operators planned to use this protocol. There have been very few hams interested in such a mode. My personal preference is to refer to it as FAE,

RE: [digitalradio] More on ALE 400 FAE and a proposed test

2009-05-28 Thread John Bradley
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tony Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 6:30 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] More on ALE 400 FAE Andy, First, is it really ALE as used currently? I am not sure that the recent tests of this mode have actually used