To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
Andy
You make a lot more sense than some of the children in this group who want
to just whine to the FCC and ARRL.
On 7/15/10 6:15 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
The comment in parenthesis in number 8
Okay now for all users to read and notice
First of all @jose : no I am not crazy, but all users should know what your
soft does EXACTLY
For the rest of the world:
There are 2 exe in the ros folder
Ros(versxyz).exe is doing the on air things and the emailreport
Adifdata.exe is connecting to
All ros spots are bogus . or almost all ... most of them wrong
Sad as I know jose could make it better
@rein you should keep the old 1.0 cause that is the last one with a
blockable adifdata exe
All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta) close
after a while if
Everyone better use V1.0 then, or we shall end up using different versions that
don't talk to each other!
- Original Message -
From: Siegfried Jackstien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:34 PM
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New question
All
!
- Original Message -
From: Siegfried Jackstien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:34 PM
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New question
All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta) close
after a while if adifdata can get no inet
So if you
: [digitalradio] New question
Why would anyone want to use any version of this software?
Which is better; the software that sends out false reports that you can
block, or the software that sends out false reports that you can't? In any
case, it is doing who knows what in the background
The comment in parenthesis in number 8 are the comments that reflect my view
of why this fine software and mode are not worth the hassle.
Andy K3UK
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jim, N1SZ n...@japierson.com wrote:
Dave All,
No, I was thinking the same thing. Let’s take a look at
: [digitalradio] New question
All ros spots are bogus . or almost all ... most of them wrong
Sad as I know jose could make it better
@rein you should keep the old 1.0 cause that is the last one with a
blockable adifdata exe
All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta
Andy
You make a lot more sense than some of the children in this group who want
to just whine to the FCC and ARRL.
On 7/15/10 6:15 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
The comment in parenthesis in number 8 are the comments that reflect my view
of why this fine software
Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his
website?
On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote:
Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
agent at FCC:
ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
maintained.
Hello friends,
I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
mode now.
He doesn't deserve that much attention.
la5vna Steinar
On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote:
Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his
website?
On Jul
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
Hello friends,
I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
mode now.
He doesn't deserve that much attention.
la5vna Steinar
On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote:
Wasn't that part
Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
Hello friends,
I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
mode now.
He
the spam messages do not seem to make a difference.
I for one, thought it would, wrong again!
Amateur Radio a la 2010
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New
here needs to like it though.
And then how can I like something that I can't use?
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com
Sent: Jul 14, 2010 1:09 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
What are you basing that statement
Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
agent at FCC:
ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
techniques.
I do not know who wrote it.
What is the problem with it?
73 Rein
16 matches
Mail list logo
