Re: [digitalradio] ROS HF Path Simulations

2010-08-04 Thread Steinar Aanesland
OK, Thanks for your answer :) LA5VNA Steinar On 03.08.2010 07:06, Tony wrote: Steinar, I've been monitoring ROS on-the-air and I've done some testing with the HF path simulator. In my opinion, it's about as good as one would expect from an MFSK mode with a relatively slow baud rate.

Re: [digitalradio] ROS HF Path Simulations

2010-08-02 Thread Tony
On 8/1/2010 7:31 AM, Steinar Aanesland wrote: Hi Tony Have you done some test comparing ros with mods like psk31 , rtty , olivia etc? Yes I have Steinar Tony -K2MO a5vna Steinar On 20.07.2010 03:42, Tony wrote: All, With all the attention ROS has been getting lately, I thought it

Re: [digitalradio] ROS HF Path Simulations

2010-08-02 Thread Steinar Aanesland
OK, is it public ? I can't find anything on digitalradio yahoogroup LA5VNA Steinar On 02.08.2010 12:58, Tony wrote: On 8/1/2010 7:31 AM, Steinar Aanesland wrote: Hi Tony Have you done some test comparing ros with mods like psk31 , rtty , olivia etc? Yes I have Steinar Tony -K2MO

Re: [digitalradio] ROS HF Path Simulations

2010-08-02 Thread Tony
Steinar, I've been monitoring ROS on-the-air and I've done some testing with the HF path simulator. In my opinion, it's about as good as one would expect from an MFSK mode with a relatively slow baud rate. Tests show that it will outperform RTTY and PSK31 in poor channel conditions (most MFSK

[digitalradio] ROS HF Path Simulations

2010-08-01 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Tony Have you done some test comparing ros with mods like psk31 , rtty , olivia etc? la5vna Steinar On 20.07.2010 03:42, Tony wrote: All, With all the attention ROS has been getting lately, I thought it would be interesting to see how the narrow mode compared to the wide version

Re: [digitalradio] ROS HF Path Simulations wide vs. narrow

2010-07-21 Thread KH6TY
Thanks for the testing Tony. We observe Doppler shifts of as much as 100 Hz and Doppler spreads around 50 Hz or greater. On SSB phone, a S3 signal will not be intelligible and you can hear the voice pitch go down in a fluttering manner. ROS definitely produces nothing but garbage when SSB

Re: [digitalradio] ROS HF Path Simulations wide vs. narrow

2010-07-20 Thread KH6TY
Tony, Our on-air tests show that ROS 16 baud, 2200 Hz wide spread spectrum was very poor on UHF under Doppler spreading. Can you confirm this with flutter tests like Jaak has done on http://contestia.blogspot.com/p/pathsim_09.html ? 73, Skip KH6TY On 7/19/2010 9:42 PM, Tony wrote: All,

Re: [digitalradio] ROS HF Path Simulations wide vs. narrow

2010-07-20 Thread Tony
On 7/20/2010 3:54 PM, KH6TY wrote: Our on-air tests show that ROS 16 baud, 2200 Hz wide spread spectrum was very poor on UHF under Doppler spreading. Can you confirm this with flutter tests like Jaak has done. Skip, My path tests show that ROS is less tolerant to Doppler spread than Olivia

[digitalradio] ROS HF Path Simulations wide vs. narrow

2010-07-19 Thread Tony
All, With all the attention ROS has been getting lately, I thought it would be interesting to see how the narrow mode compared to the wide version under the controlled environment of the HF path simulator. After a few hours of testing, it seems there's little difference between the two. The