@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 04:25 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ROS - make it legal in USA
Is it? Look at the published technical specs and explain how it is Spread
Spectrum or frequency hopping other than by label.
73,
Bill, N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John B. Stephensen kd6...@... wrote:
What ROS users should do is email their ARRL representative and have them
petition the FCC to change the rules. One solution is to eliminate the
emission designators and change the RTTY/data segment of each HF band to
Not all radio sevices reference 2.201 so changing part 97 wouldn't be a major
problem for the FCC.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: vinceinwaukesha
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 21:19 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ROS - make
Is it? Look at the published technical specs and explain how it is Spread
Spectrum or frequency hopping other than by label.
73,
Bill, N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John B. Stephensen kd6...@... wrote:
ROS is MFSK16 with frequency hopping so it is SS per the FCC definition as
