On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:20 PM, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
Obviously, there are pros and cons to various approaches. You approach
is
only faster if you know that the file in questions was recently
modified.
If that is the case, you lucked out. What happens if the source of the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Richard Pieri richard.pi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Oct 25, 2011, at 7:51 PM, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
The snapshot has no effect on the master, and yes, we've already said and
we already know it is a weakness in LVM that if you don't extend your
snapshots
On Oct 25, 2011, at 11:20 PM, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
Actually, in LVM 'a' and 'b' are completely independent, each have their
own copy of the COW data. So, if 'a' gets nuked, 'b' is fine, and vice
virca.
Rather, this is how LVM works *because* of this situation. If LVM
supported
Hsuan-Yeh Chang hsuan...@gmail.com asked:
Can anyone recommend an ISP (optical fiber) for 1-10 Gbps
capability, particularly servicing small businesses in the
Boston metro area?
Cogent (www.cogentco.com) and XO (www.xo.com) were the two I used most
recently, serving sites in Kendall Square and
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:20:40PM -0400, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
Data point: It takes ~19 hours to restore 7.5TB from enterprise-class
Tivoli Storage Manager over 1GB Ethernet to a 12x1TB SATA (3Gb/s) RAID 6
volume. I had to do it this past spring after the RAID controller on that
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:26 AM, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
400GB/hour? I doubt that number, but ok. It is still close to three hours.
Doubt if you want but I did it last spring. 7.5TB -- ~7500GB -- restored
over 19 hours and change. That's 400GB/hour average throughput. Over a
network.
I've been tagging my commits, and now I want to use that in my code. The
'git describe' command does this nicely:
In my sandbox I get '1.0.3-1-gf9a4796', but if I push (actually pull)
that into another repository I get '1.0.3'.
I would like to be able to display the version as well as the commit
On 10/26/2011 01:23 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
I've been tagging my commits, and now I want to use that in my code. The
'git describe' command does this nicely:
In my sandbox I get '1.0.3-1-gf9a4796', but if I push (actually pull)
that into another repository I get '1.0.3'.
I would like to be
From: ma...@mohawksoft.com [mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com]
If you can get more than 160MB/s (sustained) on anything other than exotic
hardware, I'd be surprised. 1Gbit/sec per disk sustained is currently not
possible with COTS hardware that is available.
Transfer rate is not sustained, and
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:18:06PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: ma...@mohawksoft.com [mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com]
If you can get more than 160MB/s (sustained) on anything other than exotic
hardware, I'd be surprised. 1Gbit/sec per disk sustained is currently not
possible with
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 11:30 -0400, Gregory Boyce wrote:
Turn off any local firewalling, and go to http://nmap-online.com/
After a quick scan, you will likely see a mix of open, closed and
filtered ports. Anything open or filtered should be fine to use.
Anything filtered is not.
I got
Bill Horne wrote:
If there are other ways to scan my IP, please tell m how.
ShieldsUP
https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
-Tom
--
Tom Metro
Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA
Enterprise solutions through open source.
Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
12 matches
Mail list logo
