Petitioning President Obama to End Software Patents.
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/11/we-the-people-petitioning-president-obama-to-end-software-patents.html?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=Feed%3A+PatentlyO+%28Dennis+Crouch%27s+Patently-O%29
HYC on the go
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 07:56:41AM -0400, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Dan Ritter wrote:
Everyone wants to connect their iPad or phone... so we got a
cheap cable modem from Comcast, wired up a WiFi router, and
let them play.
You don't really need a separate uplink - just
On 11/3/2011 8:47 AM, scottmarydavid...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/10/ecpa-turns-twenty-five/
Paraphrasing the article:
According to the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the law still
considers data that has been left on cloud servers for longer than six
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Daniel C. dcrooks...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
This is a problem that can be easily solved by using end-to-end
encryption. The capability is already built-in to every common email
client.
Assuming your ISP
Daniel C. dcrooks...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile)
g...@freephile.com wrote:
Why doesn't GMail reply to list by default?! Does this lack of feature bug
you?
Gmail is behaving correctly. The reply-to header is set by the
mailing list
Dan Ritter wrote:
Everyone wants to connect their iPad or phone... so we got a
cheap cable modem from Comcast, wired up a WiFi router, and
let them play.
Good approach. Obviously it can also be implemented using appropriate
router/firewall/VLAN rules, rather than a physically separate WAN
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:43:13PM -0400, Tom Metro wrote:
I can point to complete physical separation when the auditors
come. That's worth more than the Comcast bill.
Sure, but aren't there dozens of other places in your infrastructure
where your security *is* dependent on firewall rules,
