Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org observed:
one of the biggest issues is not patents per se, but the fact that
litigation can take many years ... it does
not matter if the allegation stands or not, it is sometimes the fact
that a company will settle even though it knows it can win.
One of the famous
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Kyle Leslie fbx...@gmail.com wrote:
While I don't have a ton of a background in this whole Patent thing, I have
been reading this thread and trying to form my own opinions and gain
knowledge. I decided to read the article that Matt posted and in doing so I
09:29:03 -0400
From: Kyle Leslie fbx...@gmail.com
To: BLU discuss@blu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] more on software patent
Message-ID:
CAOxrMGh3w-D-P41X1KZZrBAYLs=
nltqkyuv0kaq5vrw6-a4...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
While I don't have a ton
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Kyle Leslie fbx...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok well to give you the scope of what I am looking at, here are the public
records for the Lawsuit
http://ia600700.us.archive.org/22/items/gov.uscourts.wiwd.30864/gov.uscourts.wiwd.30864.docket.html
and here is the claim of
On 10/04/2011 12:54 PM, Hsuan-Yeh Chang wrote:
That's part of the litigation strategy. If you've ever sued or get
sued, you would know that many of the particulars are not pleaded in
the initial complaint. It often takes years for the court to figure
out whether the allegation stands or not.
On 10/02/2011 09:10 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
Glad to see the spirited discussion on software patents.
If you want to listen to a decent investigative report on how the patent
system in general (not specific to software patents) is broken, and
learn more about how troll companies operate, check
See the poster child
http://www.1201tuesday.com/1201_tuesday/2010/10/poster-child.html
If this is a valid patent; already in; how do you accommodate that?
If I were the Examiner, I would reject the claims and have the applicant
appeal my decision. With this particular case, I would blame
See the poster child
http://www.1201tuesday.com/1201_tuesday/2010/10/poster-child.html
If this is a valid patent; already in; how do you accommodate that?
If I were the Examiner, I would reject the claims and have the applicant
appeal my decision. With this particular case, I would blame
The current patent system has a measurable negative impact on my
business as a contract developer of software solutions. More often I'm
seeing clients seeking to put patent indemnification clauses into their
contracts. If such a clause is present, there is no action my business
can take to
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Hsuan-Yeh Chang hsuan...@gmail.com wrote:
35 U.S.C. 101 Inventions patentable.
Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine,
manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful
improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor,
If I have the honor, what I can offer now is to write up, in the name
of BLU, a request for ex parte reexamination and get it on file in
the patent office in an attempt to invalidate the asserted patent(s).
But, I would need support from the BLU (e.g., knowledge and time to
find prior
Hsuan-yeh,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 09:56:36PM -0400, Hsuanyeh Chang wrote:
If I have the honor, what I can offer now is to write up, in the
name of BLU, a request for ex parte reexamination and get it on
file in the patent office in an attempt to invalidate the asserted
patent(s). But, I
Glad to see the spirited discussion on software patents.
If you want to listen to a decent investigative report on how the patent
system in general (not specific to software patents) is broken, and
learn more about how troll companies operate, check out:
When Patents Attack!
I call BS on the whole idea of prior art.
It's everywhere and patents are issued that defy the rules.
There is no art in the system.
Ask a real patent attorney what he thinks.
See the poster child
http://www.1201tuesday.com/1201_tuesday/2010/10/poster-child.html
If this is a valid patent;
14 matches
Mail list logo
