on Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Drew Jensen d...@baseanswers.com
meant to write:
- sorry, the pronoun 'you' - I was _not_ talking about you the individual
there.
Ahh, yes of course Sorry! Silly me !
Best wishes,
Drew
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions
Hi, :-)
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 16:50, David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz wrote:
If you're a power user, one might prefer to have a purely
icon/tooltip-based interface?
Actually, one program UI that I personally find nicely laid out is
Inkscape... Obviously, this would be more of a power
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote in message
news:4cbfd099.7050...@documentfoundation.org...
Hi,
Larry Gusaas wrote on 2010-10-19 21.09:
The following is from http://gmane.org/post-details.php . Note the MAIL
FROM envelope has to be someth...@gmane.org. It is currently
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote in message
news:4cbfcdf9.4000...@documentfoundation.org...
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 19.44:
Bummer... my point is that non-subbed posters should simply be sent a
REJECT message with instructions on how to subscribe - or
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:17:47 -0400, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
If there is so much time wasted dealing with non-subscribers, then we
need to re-evaluate our lists and take a close look at what we are doing
wrong. Our LibO suite is so popular that so many new users call on us
for
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:40:31 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I am appalled at the level of hostility and contempt being expressed by
a few people regarding the support of ordinary users -- our customers.
While I agree that organizing good user support is important, I feel
that most of the
Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote in message
news:87tykgrn1e@sspaeth.de...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:40:31 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I am appalled at the level of hostility and contempt being expressed by
a few people regarding the support of ordinary users -- our customers.
Le 2010-10-21 01:26, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 14.18:
(including lists) for the long run...
Anyway, at a minimum, I would dearly love to see simple list specific
pages for subscribing/unsubscribing. Mailman generates these out of the
box, so its not
On 2010-10-20 6:41 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
This line has been modified because there is a different way to
unsubscribe from digest lists. We had a thread here complaining about
digest users couldn't unsubscribe at all.
?? That makes no sense. Each list has it's *own* footer, right (if not,
On 2010-10-20 6:41 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Florian is already working on a solution using a webform or something
like that, so please keep your mood and wait a bit longer.
I know that it is unsatisfactory to see problems addressed earlier to
reappear - but even if the day would have 36
On 2010-10-21 1:22 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 19.44:
Bummer... my point is that non-subbed posters should simply be sent a
REJECT message with instructions on how to subscribe - or better, a nice
instructive web page with detailed instructions on the
On 2010-10-21 1:23 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Can the Reply-to header not be fixed (by the list manager software or by
an associated script) to include the OP if that OP is not subscribed?
if someone submits a patch for mlmmj, our mailing lists software, then
yes. Otherwise no.
Ok,
On 2010-10-20 8:55 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
In that regard, the modification of the Reply-To is, I think, more
likely to give a false sense of security than to fix the problem of
people not getting responses they would benefit from.
I totally disagree.
The only time this wouldn't work is if
El 20/10/10 19:40, Jean Hollis Weber escribió:
If you don't want to expend the time and energy to support people at
their own level, that's okay. Just don't get directly involved with
users; do something else.
/rant
--Jean
In Mexico, three companies are working on updating our solutions to
On 2010-10-20 9:20 PM, MiguelAngel wrote:
On 21/10/10 2:40, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I am appalled at the level of hostility and contempt being
expressed by a few people regarding the support of ordinary users
-- our customers.
Why are we expending so much time and energy to produce the
On 2010-10-21 1:10 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 14.08:
Well, as a blanket statement that isn't true of mailman...
One example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-us...@python.org/msg37624.html
MM3 is going to be mucho better in this regard...
at
Hi, :-)
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 21:58, Michel Gagnon mic...@mgagnon.net wrote:
Very nice indeed. However, I still haven't found a way to do anything
significant with it whereas I have no such problems with Draw or Visio.
But it brings the other question: Inkscape is also another vector-based
There's an interesting article about OpenOffice 3.3 beta in Computer Weekly
(the world's first weekly computer magazine) this week. It's at
http://www.computerweekly.com/galleries/243287-1/First-look-at-OpenOffice-beta.htm.
It's 10 short comments each accompanied by a photo. The 5th slide has a
The latest Java update for Macs breaks Java (1.6.0_22) use in LibreOffice and
OOo.
There is a OOo bug report (it is a showstopper for OOo 3.3) :
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115180
Also has been discussed on:
Ciao Gianluca,
Le Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:37:14 +0200,
Gianluca Turconi m...@letturefantastiche.com a écrit :
Il 20/10/2010 17.37, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
yes. So now, do you like what you see?:-)
Well, generally speaking, yes.
I'm just a bit worried about the point of view about
Hi Michel,
2010/10/21 Michel Gagnon mic...@mgagnon.net
Le 2010-10-21 03:25, David Nelson a écrit :
Hi, :-)
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 16:50, David Nelsoncomme...@traduction.biz
wrote:
If you're a power user, one might prefer to have a purely
icon/tooltip-based interface?
Actually, one
Hi Charles, *,
Charles Marcus schrieb:
On 2010-10-20 6:41 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
This line has been modified because there is a different way to
unsubscribe from digest lists. We had a thread here complaining
about digest users couldn't unsubscribe at all.
?? That makes no sense. Each
On 2010-10-21 4:38 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Youre right *but* AFAIK the digest mails are a container of the mails
sent during the day. And *those* single mails hold the footer of the
original one posted.
Ahh... right. forgot about that... interesting problem...
Probably should add the
Hi everyone,
the most recent Steering Committee meeting minutes are available:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Minutes_2010-10-20
Agenda 2010-10-20:
* Update on: get discussion about community structure started (how
to define members?)
*
On 10/21/2010 9:52 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 8:55 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
In that regard, the modification of the Reply-To is, I think, more
likely to give a false sense of security than to fix the problem of
people not getting responses they would benefit from.
I totally
On 10/21/2010 12:02 AM, Drew Jensen wrote:
If we had a similar page for OOo, it would make an
enormous difference there, as well.
Why not - http://oucv.org/oooext.html
I did not setup that nabble archive, and can't change settings - if you
back up there to the openoffice level you are
On 10/20/2010 11:50 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 19:55 -0500, Barbara Duprey wrote:
Howdy Barbara
I don't have anything against forums (though I hope we can avoid having two
top-level ones, as for
OOo, and careful planning is needed in determining the subforums). The main
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 17:09 -0500, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 10/20/2010 11:50 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
Every web forum I know of send notification email to the original poster
whenever a response is posted to a thread they created.
Well now, that's *very* interesting! I clearly haven't used
Barbara Duprey b...@onr.com wrote in message
news:4cc0ba20.70...@onr.com...
On 10/20/2010 11:50 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
snip
Every web forum I know of send notification email to the original poster
whenever a response is posted to a thread they created.
Well now, that's *very*
On 10/21/2010 6:28 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Many forums, and wiki pages, allow you to tick a box to watch them,
even if you didn't originate them, and then you'll get a notification of
each response. I agree, though, that it's a nuisance to not have the
response itself show up in one's
On 10/21/2010 5:18 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
I'd just like to make sure I'm clear on this, OK? If I get a message
with a Reply-To header, and respond to it using Reply, not only does the
response go to those in the Reply-To header,
Yes it goes to everyone in the Reply-To header...
but that
31 matches
Mail list logo
