Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
Honestly, I believe new developers joined because the bar for
contribution was lowered ...
the paperwork reduction may have helped too, but I don't see
it as the most effective improvement.
The paperwork was only a practical detail: not
plino wrote:
One of the bugs I reported (which is now obsolete, but still there) caused
that a user would loose data ...
And the bug has been ignored since then (this was in
November 25th 2009)
Could you provide the OpenOffice.org issue number?
Honestly I can't understand how you can state
Hi Andrea,
( just to mention: I did not make my mind on this yet, I'm just
providing some thoughts)
Von: Andrea Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org
An: discuss@documentfoundation.org
The paperwork was only a practical detail: not relinquising your
copyright is the most important.
I
On Wednesday, October 27, 2010 23:02:43 Andras Timar wrote:
2010.10.26. 9:06 keltezéssel, Xi Embalsado írta:
Can you make the defaults:
- White fill in shapes rather than light blue
I was thinking of LibreOffice Green instead of Blue 8... What do you
think? This is easy to change.
This
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello BRM,
Le Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:12:59 -0700 (PDT),
BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com a écrit :
- Original Message
From: Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
4) the notion that we cannot change license because we don't have
copyright assignment
Hi!
On Monday 01 November 2010, Andre Schnabel wrote:
If we want an answer on this (would developers not have joined if there
was a CA) we would need to ask them. This should indeed be asked
at the dev-list. I'd bet, that at least some of them would state
that they not would have joined.
I
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:44:31 -0700, Andy Brown wrote:
Who had the bright idea to require the non-removable extensions in
LibreOffice? This, IMO, is totally uncalled for. This is a great way
to lose users.
While I agree that there should be no non-removable extensions by
default, the tone
Issue 107217
It is obsolete because it referred to a problem concerning the number of
lines in a spreadsheet which has been increased since then (the current
version supports 2^20 lines instead of the traditional 2^16)
It is ignored because it is not closed.
Maybe it could still be fixed to
2010/11/1 Johannes Bausch johannes.bau...@gmail.com:
Hey,
Here's what I think the whole style and document setup should look
like. It's done very quickly in Inkscape, so don't expect anything
spectacular. Still, I hope you get the general idea.
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Spaeth wrote on 2010-11-01 16.36:
Dear all, all discussions seem to hint at that the first stable release
of LibreOffice is going to be a 3.3.0 release. I would like to have you
consider a different version for the following reasons:
- LO 3.3.0 suggests it is equivalent
On 10/31/2010 12:11 AM, Michel Gagnon wrote:
or, to put it clearly, styles OF tables.
FWIW, I fake that by creating a set of styles just for tables, and a
master table. Whenever I need a table, I simply copy the master table.
I have been reminded it already exists (thanks Marc).
Better
Hi there,
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 04:09 -0700, plino wrote:
In the spirit of Open Source it doesn't make any sense that a closed
source compiler is used.
I agree - at least; it should be possible to compile with MINGW, and
we're working on that. The big stumbling block, which is also a
Hi Andrea,
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:56 +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I haven't seen any new contributor write that they joined because of
(the refusal of) a copyright agreement; while I have seen several new
contributors write that they started contributing because the Easy
Hacks were so
Hi
Really - this discussion belongs on the developer list; and the person
who needs to be contributing is the one complaining :-) so - I greatly
welcome your contribution here: there is a lot to do, but it is quite
do-able, and I (and Fridrich + Jesus) would be happy to mentor anyone
Le 2010-11-01 07:34, Michael Meeks a écrit :
Hi there,
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:53 -0400, Michel Gagnon wrote:
however I cannot modify my installation to remove the PDF Import and
Persenter Console.
So - there are lots of parts of LibreOffice that cannot be removed
easily; such as the
- Original Message
From: Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
On 2010-10-31 6:56 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Now, without copyright assignment/agreement (granted by the LibreOffice
developers to the Document Foundation), the Document Foundation will be
in the awkward
On 10/30/2010 08:55 PM, Robert
Well, I guess I have now run afoul of the asked for a feature that was
already there thing.
The central issue here is that the obvious documentation doesn't cover
all of the nooks and crannies.
we probably should have a copy of a users manual that is part of
Gianluca Turconi wrote:
IMO, it isn't only a question about better defaults, but a real
turning point for LibO.
I'll try to clarify my point of view.
Let's say that by the time ODF 1.2 will be out, every feature
currently supported from LibO will be in ODF specification too. That
would
18 matches
Mail list logo
