The point here is that OOo has a small installer with 140Mb (no Java, and
only English, Spanish and French dictionaries).
Why is LO going in the opposite direction with 299 and 466Mb???
The current packages (including in the smallest option 56 language packs!!!)
makes no sense IMO as I mentioned
Hi,
At 10:50 30/11/2010, Sigrid Carrera wrote:
Hi, 2010/11/30 Jih-Yao Lin jih...@gmail.com
what is the WW8Num3 below the writer?
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Which number below Writer?
At which position is it in the status bar? In my status bar is the
following (from left to
On 2010-11-30 5:43 AM, plino wrote:
The point here is that OOo has a small installer with 140Mb (no Java, and
only English, Spanish and French dictionaries).
Why is LO going in the opposite direction with 299 and 466Mb???
The current packages (including in the smallest option 56 language
On 11/30/2010 05:43 AM, plino wrote:
The point here is that OOo has a small installer with 140Mb (no Java, and
only English, Spanish and French dictionaries).
Why is LO going in the opposite direction with 299 and 466Mb???
The current packages (including in the smallest option 56 language
How come other language packs aren't being offered separately from the
main English installer? That way sizes are kept down in regards to
downloading. I'm willing to set aside some space on my server to help
out in that respect if need be for the language packs or otherwise.
On 11/30/2010
NoOp wrote:
On 11/26/2010 12:16 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
Marc Paré wrote:
...
Of these two options, I would prefer being offered the menu AFTER
having downloaded the LO suite. The reason for this: some users may
find that downloading the suite took a longer than the anticipated
Hi,
can we find a volunteer with some Bugzilla knowledge who will get
permission for adding new versions and similar? For details please see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31783!
Regards
Rainer
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Le 2010-11-30 13:44, Robert Derman a écrit :
Its difficult to really offer any meaningful suggestions until we get
beyond the beta stage but once we do, we should really do a better job
than OOo ever did of making LO available on disk for all those people
with only dial-up or no internet
On 2010-11-30 2:16 PM, Kevin Vermeer wrote:
Perhaps the installer could be replaced by a small configuration
application, which would allow the user to select the components they wish
to install, and would then download the selected components?
This is fast becoming an FAQ...
LibO - like OOo
2010/11/30 Christophe Strobbe christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.be:
WW8Num3 seems to be a list style; you can find it in the Styles and
Formatting widget when you click the button for List Styles (i.e. the button
at the top, not the item List Styles in the menu at the bottom).
When you use it,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:10 PM, leif leiflod...@gmail.com wrote:
Den 30-11-2010 11:43, plino skrev:
The point here is that OOo has a small installer with 140Mb (no Java, and
only English, Spanish and French dictionaries).
Why is LO going in the opposite direction with 299 and 466Mb???
Hi Christophe, hi Jonathon!
Am Dienstag, den 30.11.2010, 11:42 +0100 schrieb Christophe Strobbe:
Hi,
At 18:13 29/11/2010, jonathon wrote:
On 11/29/2010 02:14 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
(...)
It's only solution is to get Your tools and Your communication
partners help You achieving
You are right. I didn't express myself correctly.
This is what I'm suggesting
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/A-proposal-for-effective-volunteer-friendly-user-support-in-LibreOffice-tp1954148p1973749.html
the first screen for the installer is simply a language selector (such as
the pidgin
- Original Message
From: Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
On 2010-11-30 2:16 PM, Kevin Vermeer wrote:
Perhaps the installer could be replaced by a small configuration
application, which would allow the user to select the components they wish
to install, and would then
Hi Florian!
I'm sorry as well ... since my day job is kind of insane at the moment
(the amount of things to do, not the job itself *g*), I'm unable to say
that I will be available that time. Thus, may anybody else be able to
host the call?
Am Dienstag, den 30.11.2010, 20:26 +0100 schrieb Florian
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:02 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Hi,
can we find a volunteer with some Bugzilla knowledge who will get
permission for adding new versions and similar? For details please see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31783!
Regards
Hello Rainer
Just getting
16 matches
Mail list logo
