Hi all,
For information the Board of Directors of Software in the Public
Interest will hold a public board of directors meeting this Wednesday
8th June 2011 at 20:30 UTC.
As the liaison for TDF, I'll attend the meeting.
Kind regards
Sophie
--
Founding member of The Document Foundation
--
Hi,
FYI: We asked the Membership Committee to follow-up with some
information on membership status and elections soon, so stay tuned. :-)
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 |
Hi Bernhard,
Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-05-16 23.31:
Therefore I'd like to propose my position as starting point for a SC
discussion, leading to a decision we can base our work on and upload to
the wiki for future reference.
currently working on some older mails... has this already been
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 18:44, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi,
FYI: We asked the Membership Committee to follow-up with some information on
membership status and elections soon, so stay
Hi,
I remember that, some time ago, Michael Meeks suggested OpenSTV as a
tool (http://www.openstv.org/).
--
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive:
Hi Plino,
On 07/06/2011 02:51, plino wrote:
[...]
It would help if every time a user asks for a bug fix or a new feature,
someone didn't say excellent, why don't you fix it / add it yourself?
If LO has hundreds of developers then maybe there is no need for everybody
to learn how to code and fix
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
2011/6/6 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
On Jun 6, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
2011/6/6 Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com:
Until the TDF has taken that last step, expect to be
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote (07-06-11 03:05)
2. @TDF: More importantly (from my POV) - what, if any, affect will this
have on TDF/LO if OOo 'dies in Apache'?
It has become clear to me the last week or so, that there is a close to
fundamental difference in the approach by IBM. This has been
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote (07-06-11 09:00)
The TDF certainly seems confident. People (and corporations) are often
reluctant to accept claims from campaigning organisations without
public evidence. Hopefully, we might be able to work together to
establish clearly and in public where the TDF is
On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-06 22.13:
Good to see the list... Not knowing things for sure, but I
would guess that Oracle had issues with #3, which gave away
(what I would expect to be) huge chunks of h/w infrastructure,
esp to
On 6/7/11 1:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Thx for the clarification... BTW, it also mentions
integration with Oracle ERP and CRM stacks
Did you really want (and expect) direct access to such incredibly
sensitive and important parts of Oracle's business structure?
How does that help the
On Jun 7, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
I do not think that going over our letter to Oracle with the intent of
finding areas where it could have been improved does any good to the
exhisting and future relationships.
I agree... My going over it was simply to indicate areas which
On 6/7/11 3:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I agree... My going over it was simply to indicate areas which
I *think* (again, I have no idea, nor do a *want* to know) may
have been reasons Oracle declined, since that seems a point
that people are extremely curious about.
Provided that they
Hi,
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on 2011-06-07 09.00:
(I'll try to avoid asking too many questions at once)
Feel free, I try to reply to all of them, if they haven't been replied
in the meantime by someone else. Hard time following all mail threads. :-)
1. What would constrain this legal
Regina Henschel schrieb:
I have just a look in the spec.
Thank you for information, good to know!
Workaround exist some:
Currently I use aSUM()-Workaround, but the problem is that some of the
Workarounds might be fixed away in future?!
(1) Write 0, and format the cell to not show the
Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 6/7/11 3:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I agree... My going over it was simply to indicate areas which
I *think* (again, I have no idea, nor do a *want* to know) may
have been reasons Oracle declined, since that seems a point
that people are extremely curious about.
On 06/07/2011 01:01 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
...
Apologies if this may have already been asked answered. If so, can
someone point me to the appropriate messages within the hundreds of posts
many, many threads on the ASF incubator list, or on this list?
Well, as much letters I spend on the
Repeat.
On 06/06/2011 06:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
will keep :/
Interesting...
Could you clarify that
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 21:05, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
will keep :/
Interesting...
Could you
On 06/07/2011 05:26 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 21:05, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
will
20 matches
Mail list logo
