Hello,
just as a reminder: the next BoD call will be tomorrow, 1600 UTC, on the
usual channels, with the agenda to be drafted on the usual wiki page. ;-)
The BoD needs to have a private call this week (contents will, according
to our bylaws, be published as soon as possible afterwards), so
Le 2012-01-23 02:07, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
- A third option would be to send out a voting invitation to everyone
subscribe to a set of mailing lists (e.g. discuss@, announce@ and so
on), but send them a private token. That way, only active people in
the project could vote, but TDF
Marc Paré wrote (24-01-12 10:36)
This third option seems to make the most sense. As you imply, the most
active members would then be included in the vote.
I agree, but of course we say 'active people' here.
As this is a form of filtering of our mailing lists active
contributers, we could
Am 23.01.2012 08:07, schrieb Florian Effenberger:
- Where I'm a bit undetermined is the voting scheme itself
- One option is to allow every subscriber to the announce@ lists to vote
(after e-mail confirmation in the voting system itself),
- another one is to allow only TDF members to vote.
Hi,
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2012-01-24 10:57:
First when I saw this thread I expected a BoD-vote.
I guess that would be the wrong direction. The conference is for the
communit at large, so the community should decide.
In theory, that means opening up a public link so anyone can
Hi Florian,
2012/1/23 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org:
[..]
- Where I'm a bit undetermined is the voting scheme itself
[..]
- another one is to allow only TDF members to vote. The latter one would
exclude joke votings like we have seen them in the past, but exclude many
Hi,
2012/1/24 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org:
So, I'd like to find some sensible mechanism to involve as many people as
possible, without opening the door for misuse of the voting.
Just a guess: A minimum of five postings to any of our mailinglists up
to this day?
Volker
Hi,
Volker Merschmann wrote on 2012-01-24 11:06:
- another one is to allow only TDF members to vote. The latter one would
exclude joke votings like we have seen them in the past, but exclude many
eligible people.
This is what I would prefer.
I think this would exclude a fair amount of
Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
the code contributors are not members, but indeed do a very valueable
work. Excluding them from voting sounds wrong.
And it's not logic: the conference is not meant for members
On 1/24/12 11:04 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2012-01-24 10:57:
First when I saw this thread I expected a BoD-vote.
I guess that would be the wrong direction. The conference is for the
communit at large, so the community should decide.
In theory,
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2012-01-24 12:49:
Would this help any facilitating the votes?
http://doodle.com/
maybe, but I am not so keen in having so large votes on an ad-financed
platform. Maybe we can use an own survey system.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Helli Florian
I'd still go for letting TDF members vote, why would we have the membership
then? :-)
Best,
Charles.
Le 24 janv. 2012 13:09, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
a écrit :
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2012-01-24 12:49:
Would this help any facilitating the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
Em 24-01-2012 09:03, Cor Nouws escreveu:
Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
the code contributors are not members, but indeed do a very valueable
work.
Hi...just a general question as I test LO 3.5: Ever since LoDEV versions of
3.5 I cannot find the general FONT section in options for setting the
default
FONT which is easily found in all older versions. Did it move or is it
omitted for
some reason?
I have searched high and low to find this
Hi Bob,
Robert Boehm wrote (24-01-12 16:06)
Hi...just a general question as I test LO 3.5: Ever since LoDEV versions of
3.5 I cannot find the general FONT section in options for setting the
default FONT which is easily found in all older versions.
Did it move or is it omitted for some reason?
Thank-you so much!
Bob
On 01/24/2012 09:19 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Bob,
Robert Boehm wrote (24-01-12 16:06)
Hi...just a general question as I test LO 3.5: Ever since LoDEV
versions of
3.5 I cannot find the general FONT section in options for setting the
default FONT which is easily found in
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 12:48 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
Em 24-01-2012 09:03, Cor Nouws escreveu:
Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
the code
Hi,
Am 24.01.2012 14:26, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
I'd still go for letting TDF members vote, why would we have the
membership then? :-)
Beeing committed to the project does not necessarily mean to be a
member of the TDF. The event is supposed to be a LibreOffice
Conference rather than a TDF
On 24/01/2012 12:03, Cor Nouws wrote:
Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
the code contributors are not members, but indeed do a very valueable
work. Excluding them from voting sounds wrong.
And it's not logic: the
Hi,
Olivier Hallot wrote on 2012-01-24 15:48:
Voting is a measure of traceable membership participation/activity.
Otherwise we can get spammed on untraceable votes to send us where we
don't want LibCon to happen.
by that, we would exclude a large amount of developers, and I am sure
want to
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Olivier Hallot wrote on 2012-01-24 15:48:
Voting is a measure of traceable membership participation/activity.
Otherwise we can get spammed on untraceable votes to send us where we
don't want LibCon to happen.
by that, we would exclude a large amount of
21 matches
Mail list logo
