Re: [tdf-discuss] Thank you for using OpenOffice.org

2011-02-24 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Hi Cor, Seth, *, Am 23.02.2011 21:49, schrieb Cor Nouws: Hi Seth, s kadish wrote (23-02-11 19:03) Hi, this is the second time I've installed LO. Previously I installed 3.3, and now 3.3.1. Both times, at the end of installation, I was directed to a page called Thank you for using

Re: [tdf-discuss] Thank you for using OpenOffice.org

2011-02-24 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi klaus-jürgen, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote (24-02-11 09:20) I have had the same Thank you website. My system: WIN7 64bit (SP1) I had installed OOo but deinstalled a longer time ago. I'm getting this website every time when I'm installing a new LibO. Before I install a new LibO I always

[tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa

2011-02-24 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 06:54:33 -0600 Sonic4Spuds sonic4sp...@gmail.com wrote: Just checked synaptic and all of the files in the ppa are listed as version 3.3.0.0 rc4. Also made sure that it is getting the latest list from the ppa. There are natty versions for 3.3.1. Beware of partial

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa

2011-02-24 Thread Jaime R. Garza
Dear Bjoern, I think a lot of people though it was an official LibreOffice PPA for Ubuntu, not an official Canonical package: http://www.silicongadget.com/guides/software-guides/office-suites/install-libreoffice-on-ubuntu-using-the-official-repository/2097/

[tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa

2011-02-24 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Jaime, Hi all, On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:33:23 +0100 Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote: I think a lot of people though it was an official LibreOffice PPA for Ubuntu, not an official Canonical package:

[tdf-discuss]Print Intentions for LO documents

2011-02-24 Thread Fernand Vanrie
With no luck I tried in the past to convince the OO developers to include Print intentions in the there documents. We need to store some meta-data about where and how the document will been published, On screen, printed on a Laser Printer, Printed by en professional Printhouse etc This

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa

2011-02-24 Thread Jaime R. Garza
Dear Bjoern, I don't think anyone is trying to make you responsible for anything, ;-) We just kindly ask when would the 3.3.1 version be available in the PPA? Cheers! Jaime On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 15:36, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: Hi Jaime, Hi all, On Thu,

Re: [tdf-discuss] Oracle Contributor Agreement and LibreOffice contributions

2011-02-24 Thread Phil Hibbs
Kohei: That's the wrong assumption I was trying to point out. It's not always applied as-is, and in fact it's rare that patches be accepted as is. Even we don't do that too often. Nonetheless, saying it's better for us if you don't submit your patches to OOo is kind of like saying Lets hope

[tdf-discuss] Re: Oracle Contributor Agreement and LibreOffice contributions

2011-02-24 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 24/02/11 16:51, Phil Hibbs a écrit : Hi Phil, Nonetheless, saying it's better for us if you don't submit your patches to OOo is kind of like saying Lets hope OOo don't spot this bug/issue. It's ethically dubious. If this is the official approach, then why not just make a clean break

Re: [tdf-discuss] Oracle Contributor Agreement and LibreOffice contributions

2011-02-24 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:51 +, Phil Hibbs wrote: Kohei: That's the wrong assumption I was trying to point out. It's not always applied as-is, and in fact it's rare that patches be accepted as is. Even we don't do that too often. Nonetheless, saying it's better for us if you don't

Re: [tdf-discuss] Oracle Contributor Agreement and LibreOffice contributions

2011-02-24 Thread Jaime R. Garza
I think it's inevitable that more and more differences of opinion will arise, so I also believe LO should start their own independent path. Just my 2c, ;-) Jaime On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:51, Phil Hibbs sna...@gmail.com wrote: Kohei: That's the wrong assumption I was trying to point out.

Re: [tdf-discuss] Thank you for using OpenOffice.org

2011-02-24 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi klaus-jürgen, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote (24-02-11 10:17) * I deinstalled it again. After that I deleted in Benutzer-AppData-...-Roaming the folders OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice. Delete the installation folder and the LibreOffice folder in Programme (x86). * After a restart of

Re: [tdf-discuss] Thank you for using OpenOffice.org

2011-02-24 Thread Chris Montgomery
The exact same thing happened to me, too. I'm running Windows XP SP3 s kadish said the following on 2/23/2011 12:03 PM: Hi, this is the second time I've installed LO. Previously I installed 3.3, and now 3.3.1. Both times, at the end of installation, I was directed to a page called Thank you

Re: [tdf-discuss] Thank you for using OpenOffice.org

2011-02-24 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Cor Nouws schrieb: I have never seen that effect. Hi, I also can't remember. Did anyone check whether that message also shows up when you repair the installation? I believe in the custom installation somewhere is a selection to deactivate check for updates. Did someone check whether that

Re: [tdf-discuss] Thank you for using OpenOffice.org

2011-02-24 Thread Markus Gommel
Hi Cor, Am 23.02.2011 21:49, schrieb Cor Nouws: Hi Seth, s kadish wrote (23-02-11 19:03) Hi, this is the second time I've installed LO. Previously I installed 3.3, and now 3.3.1. Both times, at the end of installation, I was directed to a page called Thank you for using OpenOffice.org,

[tdf-discuss] CALC-Unintended DATE formatting

2011-02-24 Thread OBUTEX/Hladůvka
In both versions 3.3. and 3.3.1 in Calc when I enter text e.g. I1 into an empty cell it is changed to 1.1.2001 and it is not possible to change it untill 'I1 entered. I really do not like such an irritating behavior - if I wished to enter a date I simply write the date. I checked out all the