[tdf-discuss] new years wishes

Wishing you all the best for 2013: love, joy, happiness, inspiration for your work and fun in building and sharing good things in life. Cor -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org - www.librelex.org -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://ww

Re: [tdf-discuss] new years wishes

I would love to echo those wishes in return to the entire community :) as well as yourself Cor :) On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Wishing you all the best for 2013: love, joy, happiness, inspiration for > your work and fun in building and sharing good things in life. > > Cor

RE: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

[Resent using the list-known correct e-mail address] Is it CMIS that is being asked about? There is more information here: . - Dennis -Original Message- From: Immanuel Giulea [mailto:giulea.imman...@gmail.com] Sent:

Re: [tdf-discuss] new years wishes

Cor, all, Happy New Year! Best, Charles. Cor Nouws a écrit : >Wishing you all the best for 2013: love, joy, happiness, inspiration >for >your work and fun in building and sharing good things in life. > >Cor > >-- > - Cor > - http://nl.libreoffice.org > - www.librelex.org > > >-- >Unsub

RE: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

Dennis, Yes indeed. Charles. "Dennis E. Hamilton" a écrit : >[Resent using the list-known correct e-mail address] > >Is it CMIS that is being asked about? > >There is more information here: >. > > - Dennis > >-Original M

[tdf-discuss] LO4 and CMIS integration

Thanks for the link Dennis, great start. I digged further into it and found that CMIS v1.1 was recently released (0). I also found that there was a presentation about LO/CMIS during LibOCon2012 (1)(2) And there's a good explanation with screenshots for integration with Alfresco (3) So far, what

[tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences

Hello all, In the marketing materials that I am writing covering LO vs AOO, I was wondering if it would be relevant to go into an explanation about why the GPL/LGPL licence used by LO was superior to the ASL as a "true open source". I found this great document that explains the three "most common

[tdf-discuss] Targeting LO4 at MSO 2003 users

Hello all, With only six weeks before the release, I was wondering if there was a marketing plan/strategy in place (or to be discussed at the Jan. marketing call) for targeting current MSO 2003 users with WinXP and Vista. Cheers, Immanuel -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@doc

[tdf-discuss] Re: Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

On 12/29/2012 07:30 AM, Immanuel Giulea wrote: > Hello all, > > Microsoft put out a three-page document that hits on some of the weaknesses > of LO (and bundles LO with OOo): > http://download.microsoft.com/download/D/0/D/D0DA0C4B-22DE-40C7-A84D-0C7E03347A9C/Considering-LibreOffice-and-OO-v2.pdf >

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences

On 12/31/2012 02:40 PM, Immanuel Giulea wrote: Hello all, In the marketing materials that I am writing covering LO vs AOO, I was wondering if it would be relevant to go into an explanation about why the GPL/LGPL licence used by LO was superior to the ASL as a "true open source". I found this gr

[tdf-discuss] LibreOffice and OpenERP

Hello all, I got in touch with Fabrice Henrion (Director of Business Development Americas at OpenERP) via LinkedIn, and here was his response to two points the mailing list raised previously 1- Intentions to have an integration with LibreOffice? > We don't intend to work on a LibreOffice integra

RE: [tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences

That is completely incorrect, no matter how many folks keep saying it. Put simply: using the LibreOffice or Apache OpenOffice distributions does not raise any practical limitations on most personal use as well as use by individuals in their business or institutional activities. - Dennis PS:

RE: [tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences

I understand that differences between licences are technical and seem trivial to end-users. So if not the licences, how is LO different from AOO? In terms that end-users can understand. Immanuel On Dec 31, 2012 8:29 PM, "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote: > That is completely incorrect, no matter how m

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences

You need a degree in licensing to really know all the ins ands outs of what is the differences between them. That said, it still is all about what the developer feels is a better license for their coding. What I have heard from people is that they would prefer to provide the coding under on

RE: [tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences

I think Immanuel's question about what are the differences for users is more important. With regard to technicalities: It happens that ASF projects do not accept GPL/LGPL code into their code bases. Period. That's the ASF and it applies to ASF projects, including Apache OpenOffice. On the o

RE: [tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences

I dropped an important word: "I have *no* quarrel with others who want their code to be handled differently." -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 20:54 To: 'webmaster-Kracked_P_P'; discuss@documentfoundation.org Su

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO vs AOO : GPL/LGPL vs ASL licences

Not sure if this will help http://opensource.org/licenses/index.html but that site allows one to read the licenses in more detail. On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > I dropped an important word: > > "I have *no* quarrel with others who want their code to be handled > d