: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http
, *,
Jonathan Aquilina schrieb:
Random thought here. im willing to donate some webspace to a wordpress
setup for the project. i have experience in making the site look less
like a blog and more like a proper website and there are some really
killer themes available for wordpress
I am not trying to hijack this list, but wouldn't it be better to have a
list for each language that we support, if we have users of particular
languages they can use that list and not have to struggle to use English
to get help?
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
I also think Michael on the site i think we should offer multiple irc
channels which are language specific like ubuntu have.
for instance:
LibreOffice-fr for french etc.
Also another suggestion for the drupal site is to include access to the
irc using qwebirc which can be integrated into the
No problem. looking forward to seeing the website :) and hatching up
some more suggestions :)
On 11/26/10 8:45 AM, Michael Wheatland wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think Michael on the site i think we should offer multiple irc
How come other language packs aren't being offered separately from the
main English installer? That way sizes are kept down in regards to
downloading. I'm willing to set aside some space on my server to help
out in that respect if need be for the language packs or otherwise.
On 11/30/2010
hey guys i think i have a solution to the high contrast issue with a
dark desktop theme. how come we aren't using the app selection menu from
OOo? it works just fine in regards to a dark colored background.
attached there are the images. one in white is the LO with a dark theme,
and white app
Kevin i stumbled upon this totally by accident
this is the OOo menu upon start up. it works perfectly with my dark
colored theme i have.
http://imagebin.ca/view/jXXsCVUY.html
could what OOo has be a temporary place holder till we can get something
sorted out? This fix doesn't have to make
I know of a site that does portable apps for windows. Seeing how to do
it there you might be able to get an idea of how things need to be done
to make it portable on other operating systems.
the site is http://portableapps.com/
On 12/8/10 10:53 AM, Thomas Hofmann wrote:
Hello all,
I guess
I used to use alien in the past and it never really used to work well in
regards to the packages once converted.
Have you tested with lucid which is rock solid as well as maverick?
On 12/11/2010 01:40 PM, Susan Cragin wrote:
I also tried converting the RPMs through alien.
All I get is the
FYI for those that aren't aware. Microsoft office 2010 supports ODF
format for opening and saving documents now.
On 12/31/10 1:12 AM, BRM wrote:
- Original Message
From: Barbara Dupreyb...@onr.com
snip
We need to force MS to support ODF - as others have pointed out ODF is
quickly
Is this only for the french dictionary or do they work on dictionaries
for other languages?
On 12/31/10 3:00 PM, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi all,
On 31/12/2010 16:56, pierre choffardet wrote:
Le 31/12/2010 11:51, James Clemence a écrit :
A major feature I find irritating in word processors is
Sophie try get him on the mailing list. I am sure he would wanna see and
read all of this.
On 12/31/10 5:03 PM, Sophie wrote:
Hi,
On 31/12/2010 18:59, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Is this only for the french dictionary or do they work on
dictionaries for other languages?
Everything can be ported
I think that is going to be a problem getting this integrated into LO is
finding the man power to code whats necessary into LO for this to work.
On 12/31/10 5:38 PM, Sophie wrote:
On 31/12/2010 19:24, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Question becomes Sophie is he willing to work on integration into LO
/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
.
-- Thomas Jefferson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
discuss+h...@documentfoundation.orgdiscuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
--
Jonathan Aquilina
to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
to
discuss+h...@documentfoundation.orgdiscuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h
Jaime i only said Thunderbird cuz that's the client i use. there are
tons of others.
Todd i totally agree a standard needs to be reached. like there is the
ODF format a standardized dictionary format would be a great idea.
On 1/2/11 3:54 AM, todd rme wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:42 PM,
besides email people want a calendar as well as a to do list as well
functionality wise, which Thunderbird seems to lack.
On 1/1/11 8:36 PM, Lee Hyde wrote:
On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
So, what am I saying? You don't NEED to add something useless like
Outlook or Evolution to LO.
What do other devs think about including something as mentioned below
somehow in regards to a mail client alternative to MS outlook?
On 1/2/11 7:49 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-01 1:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Whats really held OOo and will hold LO back is the lack
Zimbra is exactly what would push LO to be a serious threat to Microsoft
Office. Isn't that what the goal is of this project to slowly eat away
at Microsoft's majority market share?
On 1/2/11 10:00 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 01/02/2011 10:49 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-01 1:43 PM, Jonathan
is exactly what would push LO to be a serious threat to Microsoft
Office. Isn't that what the goal is of this project to slowly eat away at
Microsoft's majority market share?
On 1/2/11 10:00 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 01/02/2011 10:49 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-01 1:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
push LO to be a serious threat to Microsoft
Office. Isn't that what the goal is of this project to slowly eat away at
Microsoft's majority market share?
On 1/2/11 10:00 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 01/02/2011 10:49 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-01 1:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Whats
If we are looking to promote this to corporations it will need to have
one, and we could give them the option to install one. A home user might
opt out of installing it if they don't want an email client
On 1/5/11 3:22 PM, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
At 00:19 3/01/2011, Jonathan Aquilina wrote
What about bundling it with the downloadable installer?
On 1/5/11 5:32 PM, drew wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 17:11 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
If we are looking to promote this to corporations it will need to have
one, and we could give them the option to install one. A home user might
opt
with Moz, etc
Funny you mention it i just replied with a similar response about
bundling said software as part of the downloadable installer.
On 1/5/11 5:39 PM, Todd rme wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:32 AM, drewd...@baseanswers.comwrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 17:11 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina
+0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
If we are looking to promote this to corporations it will need to have
one, and we could give them the option to install one. A home user
might
opt out of installing it if they don't want an email client
Right - well, it depends to a degree on how you
. Garza
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 15:22, Christophe Strobbe
christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.be wrote:
At 00:19 3/01/2011, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
What do other devs think about including something as mentioned below
somehow in regards to a mail client alternative to MS outlook?
I've been
...@esat.kuleuven.be wrote:
At 00:19 3/01/2011, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
What do other devs think about including something as mentioned below
somehow in regards to a mail client alternative to MS outlook?
I've been working without an integrated e-mail client for years; it's
not
a priority for me
, Jan 5, 2011 at 15:22, Christophe Strobbe
christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.bewrote:
At 00:19 3/01/2011, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
What do other devs think about including something as mentioned below
somehow in regards to a mail client alternative to MS outlook?
I've been working without
I 2nd your Mac comments. What i find impressive is how they work really
well for those that like 3rd party apps like myself Thunderbird
interfaces really nicely with the other mac apps that were mentioned below.
On 1/6/11 11:47 AM, James Wilde wrote:
On Jan 5, 2011, at 20:02 , BRM wrote:
I
Someone also mentioned there are issues with GPL licensing that Apple
doesn't seem to like :-/
On 1/7/11 6:49 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011/01/06 11:05 PM todd rme wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Larry
Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
Apple does not control what software I
Would we do something with LO, or would there be GPL licensing issues?
On 01/07/2011 10:04 AM, Uwe Altmann wrote:
Am 07.01.11 04:57, schrieb todd rme:
- It is not packaged and submitted using Apple’s packaging
technologies included in Xcode – No third party installers are allowed
(I thought
I was told there is an issue with mac and the GPL and LGPL licensing.
not sure what exactly though.
On 1/7/11 8:26 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011/01/07 12:57 AM Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Someone also mentioned there are issues with GPL licensing that Apple
doesn't seem to like
Sorry for long delay on response. my email gets inundated with TDF and
LO mails to the list. Ill try and do some digging around and let
everyone know what i find. atm i have 2 deadlines this week. so maybe
over the weekend ill get a chance to do research on this.
On 01/07/2011 12:01 PM,
Why not license it under an appropriate license that would allow us to
put it in the app store? would that mean we would need to remove the GPL
or can it be dual licensed to go on the app store?
On 01/08/2011 01:46 PM, Charles.h.Schulz wrote:
Ben,
To be frank I would be very tempted by
Lots of apps available can be found for free. the cost of the app is up
to the developer if s/he want to put it up for free. I think LO could be
a model example to other OSS projects that this is an opportunity for
them to increase their following.
On 01/12/2011 05:35 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Mirek LO is a separate entity from Oracle, they just forked OOo and are
taking it down a different bath with a different name.
On 1/12/11 3:49 PM, Mirek M. wrote:
2011/1/12 Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com
Why not license it under an appropriate license that would allow us to put
it
You would still need permission even though its a fork of the original code?
On 1/13/11 10:30 AM, Mirek M. wrote:
Hi Jonathan, everyone,
2011/1/13 Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com
Mirek LO is a separate entity from Oracle, they just forked OOo and are
taking it down a different bath
In all honesty would they object to it?
On 1/13/11 11:46 AM, Sigrid Carrera wrote:
Hi,
2011/1/13 Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com:
You would still need permission even though its a fork of the original code?
yes, since the original contributors agreed to use a specific license.
This
If they are considering pulling the plug on the OOo line they would be
on our side. I think its worth a shot in my honest opinion.
On 01/13/2011 01:19 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hey Jonathan,
1) Sigrid is right, we would need to ask for Oracle to relicense.
2) The new, non-Oracle patches
Todd no there was no announcement, but why have exactly the same office
suite out there, they might actually end up pulling the plug once LO
gets going quite well.
On 1/13/11 5:00 PM, todd rme wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051...@gmail.com wrote
Being a mac user myself, i found out about OOo through word of mouth as
well as when i started working with Linux. i found out it had installers
for other OS's and i went from there. i usually promote through word of
mouth be it mac windows Linux users.
On 1/13/11 10:53 PM, Fabián Rodríguez
I know an iphone dev, and he has told me the review process does take
time, but i think in time this app store will be just as good as the app
store found on the iphone. I am more then willing to head up a team to
get this ball moving in regards to getting permission from oracle to
relicense
Speaking of support is the libreoffice irc channel even mentioned on the
site? also i think things should be split off into a dev channel and
main libreoffice channel for support. If they remain as they are once LO
goes main stream, we will have one gigantic mess of support questions
and
Where would i need to sign up for the mailing list
On 1/16/11 10:20 AM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi, :-)
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 16:52, Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
David please keep me in mind in regards to hosting official LO forums. would
it be possible to join the next SC
The devs are more than welcome to comment
What do some of the big boys think?
On 01/17/2011 05:32 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Jonathan,
You should also ask all the other devs now :-)
What I would like to have, more seriously, is lawyers working on this...
Best,
Charles.
Le Fri, 14 Jan 2011
Just signed up for the SC mailing list ill try join the next meeting if
thats possible.
On 01/17/2011 06:00 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Many of them are not here (too much traffic).
Let's see if I can raise this at one of our next SC calls. We're
really busy with other stuff, but...
best,
Fabian this is a random idea, but is it possible to have users that
submit to the discuss mailing list or a new support mailing list, to be
able to have the questions posted there, and then any answers posted are
emailed to those subscribed?
On 01/17/2011 06:53 PM, Fabián Rodríguez wrote:
I was cleaning out my junk folder to find there were at least 7 emails
which Thunderbird was nice enough to filter from my gmail inbox.
I think that filtering should be in place as an extra preventative
measure so that all users across all lists don't get bombarded with junk
mails.
--
I agree as well. it would be great publicity as well as spark interest
in the project as a whole.
On 01/18/2011 07:57 AM, Francesc Mediterranean wrote:
I absolutely agree
Francesc x. Berjano
Enviado desde Mediterranean Iphone
El 18/01/2011, a las 06:18, Danishka Navindanis...@gmail.com
On 01/18/2011 11:29 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-01-18 07.53:
I was cleaning out my junk folder to find there were at least 7 emails
which Thunderbird was nice enough to filter from my gmail inbox.
I think that filtering should be in place
The tdf-discuss list they are coming in on.
On 1/18/11 3:14 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Hi Jonathan, *,
Jonathan Aquilina schrieb:
I was cleaning out my junk folder to find there were at least 7 emails
which Thunderbird was nice enough to filter from my gmail inbox.
These for shure were
On 1/18/11 10:40 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Do you have a link to the message?
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-01-18 22.19:
The tdf-discuss list they are coming in on.
Removed every spam message i had. next time ill forward them to you.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h
On 01/18/2011 10:49 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 09/01/2011 Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
I think that we should have a webpage where Linux distributions who are
packaging LibO, could list what changes they made compared to the
On 01/18/2011 07:41 PM, Fabián Rodríguez wrote:
On 11-01-17 02:23 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Fabian this is a random idea, but is it possible to have users that
submit to the discuss mailing list or a new support mailing list, to
be able to have the questions posted there, and then any
On 01/19/2011 12:15 PM, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
At 11:48 19/01/2011, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
Hello,
I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port
LibreOffice to
HTML5, this could be also installed locally in the clients, needing
just a
browser to run.
If LibreOffice
Sophie there was a thread on here that someone was working on screen
shots, but not sure if said screen shots this person is doing is what
your after.
On 1/19/11 6:48 PM, Sophie wrote:
Hi all,
Does anybody have work on this?
Where can I find the screen shots, what still needs to be done?
On 1/22/11 12:17 PM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi Kami, :-)
I gave you author rights on the site...
BTW, we could also put your templates on Alfresco and maintain them there
David Nelson
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 19:09, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalaikami...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
2011-01-22 07:28
On 01/23/2011 08:06 PM, Carlo Strata wrote:
Il 19/01/2011 11:56, Rene Engelhard ha scritto:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:49:51PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
and, possibly, Debian might need to ship an acceptably free version
by their own standards if there were any doubt as to the
On 1/26/11 8:51 PM, Fabián Rodríguez wrote:
Hi
I recently asked on Shapado about update upgrade notifications for Mac
Windows:
http://libreoffice.shapado.com/questions/is-there-a-notification-when-updates-are-available
Someone there mentioned App Update which supports Mac Update and Version
On 1/28/11 12:27 AM, NoOp wrote:
On 01/27/2011 02:50 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
The other day we were sent a document but the sender had - presumably
by mistake - a template rather than document and in the DOTX format.
Searching the web, we found this is a horrible format with which an
awful lot
Are you trying to write in Vietnamese, or in English? the character
encoding is probably not set correctly.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly
Carl if the font is not found it should resort to the system default
font that the suite uses. His issue sounds more like a character
encoding problem.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
Usually what happens with LO bugs on ubuntu, is that they are reported
to launchpad (ubuntu bug tracker) then a bug is usually filed upstream
which would be LO bug tracker and then once a fix is released upstream a
patch would be applied to the fixed bug so they can then open the bug
pull the
Is the TDF an NGO. If its based in the EU the organization can possibly
get a lot of funding from the EU itself.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly
Would you like me to find out whats needed to be an NGO Florian?
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
I have the perfect magazine that might be willing to put LO as part of
their CD on their magazine. it is linuxformat.co.uk is their website :)
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All
Yes they do Zaphod.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Florian what i meant was what process would TDF need to take to get
funding as an NGO
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Henri they are always looking for people to write articles. Its quite a
user contributed magazine. they also release Cd's with them. would be
interesting to get Libreoffice on one of their Cd's
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive:
Alex I still feel someone like one of the devs should write an article
for this magazine, it will be good publicity, and maybe by 3.4 we can
work on getting it on their CD.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive:
is LO ready for the big time that is the question now. that would be
quite an interesting article to do a comparison between the 2 office suites.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All
Italo whats your take on writing an article for the magazine i mentioned
in an earlier post?
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity
On 02/09/2011 02:28 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 2/9/11 2:16 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Italo whats your take on writing an article for the magazine i mentioned
in an earlier post?
Articles are always welcome, but they should be agreed beforehand by
the editorial team of the magazine
Alex there is an article regarding the 20 things about OOo which could
be improved if someone has a subscription to linuxformat.co.uk they
could download the pd of the article. it would be a great one to follow
and make improvements on their suggestions.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
im not saying redistribute it. i would put together a summary of the 20
things we could get an edge against OOo on. the summary basically says
that things are slowly improving, with it we can take those things that
are slowly improving on OOo and improve them much quicker then OOo. what
this
On the EU level.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
to read the article you need to be subscribed to the magazine.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
On 2/18/11 1:15 PM, Joe Rotello wrote:
A Question RE: LibreOffice 3.3.1 and LibreOffice 3.3 Portable
Can we presume that when LibreOffice 3.3.1 appears, will LibreOffice
3.3 Portable likewise be updated, or possibly will LibreOffice 3.3
Portable be able to check and update to 3.3.1 from
On 2/18/11 3:12 PM, John wrote:
If anybody cares (and it seems not), I have found out that my problem
with loading the 64bit deb file from the LibreOffice home page ONLY
happens when I'm using the lastest stable version of Chrome.
So I solved my problem by downloading with Firefox.
After
On 2/23/11 12:25 AM, Valter Mura wrote:
In data giovedì 13 gennaio 2011 22:53:59, Fabián Rodríguez ha scritto:
On 11-01-12 11:35 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011/01/12 8:49 AM Mirek M. wrote:
2011/1/12 Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com
Why not license it under an appropriate
On 2/26/2011 1:59 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
NoOp wrote on 2011-02-25 22.42:
Added note: you can reproduce if you use
https://www.libreoffice.org/
hm, I still cannot reproduce you. So, you say if you open
https://www.libreoffice.org
you get a certification error? Anyone else can
***
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
On 3/3/11 11:21 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
Hello,
just wondering, how difficult is it to port LibreOffice to the Android
Tablets?
Is there any plan already?
Cheers!
Jaime
Seeing as android is linux based, i honestly dont think it would be that
hard. I think the hardest part would be getting
In my opinion (part time mac dev) I think once lion goes live and we get
something working for that we can expand the versions which this feature
can be included in.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive:
On 3/6/11 5:32 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/3/6 csol...@gmail.comcsol...@gmail.com
Hi,what is up?
my friend that works at chinese electronic corporation called
VIP-SHIMAO tell me: their company is carrying out a promotion
activity,
there are phone,notebook,LCD TV and so on,not only all of goods
James why use moderators when there is technology that will filter it
automatically for us?
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity
On 3/7/11 2:58 PM, Chao Sun wrote:
Hello Alexandro,
However, I would rather see some code, and not just ideas. My question is
when will u launch a proof of concept, or at least try?
We are typing some code now. However, firstly we need to do the cross compile part. And
some issues need to
On 3/9/11 11:07 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
Mailman has not been chosen mainly out of two reasons:
1. Moderation via e-mail is not comfortable. It especially requires
one password shared among all moderators, which is inconvenient.
2. Although virtual domains are supported, the
On 3/9/11 9:04 AM, James Wilde wrote:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 08:50 , James Wilde wrote:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 04:05 , NoOp wrote:
Of late there are multiple posts on the users list regarding mail list
subscribe and unsubscribe issues.
snip
Florian points out an issue with mailman:
On 3/9/11 3:23 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-03-09 14.53:
Can mailman integrate with spamassassin? if it can why not route the
lists through a spamassassin? My reasoning for this is that we will
eliminate list moderation and free up moderators for other
On 3/9/11 3:27 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-03-09 15.25:
Have you tried using spamassassin with baysian filtering. the way I have
things setup on my mail server is that emails are checked and given a
score default being 5. anything 5 or higher
On 3/12/11 12:44 AM, NoOp wrote:
To all the LibreOffice/TDF users/contributors in Japan areas affected
by the earthquake,
I wish you, your families, and friends well.
Gary
here here.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive:
On 3/19/11 12:28 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
AG wrote (19-03-11 09:41)
In LibO Write, I am unable to insert the special character of the Euro
symbol into the text. I can in Calc, but in Write when I try to do so
all that is shown is a slim grey bar where the symbol should be.
I am using the
On 3/20/11 5:18 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-19 4:14 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
On 3/18/11 1:32 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-17 4:06 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
I prefer separate windows because I can compare and proof
documents/sheets side by side and mouse focus in linux
Charles in last email you mentioned vertical, why not give the user the
option to have it vertical or horizontal.
They can drag it and it snaps in vertically or horizontally?
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive:
On 3/26/11 5:30 PM, Carl Symons wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garzagar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I don't really see any good reason for
On 31/03/2011 17:51, Stefan Weigel wrote:
Hi,
interesting discussion.
Am 31.03.2011 17:32, schrieb Jaime R. Garza:
disadvise?
Well, I consistently advise to use free software (not freeware!) and
open standards.
Thinkfree has great compatibility with MS formats (still the
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
