Not only not related to jQuery, but not related to closures either. :-)
The problem is that setTimeout doesn't accept the additional arguments you
are passing it.
Is there any reason you can't do this:
setTimeout( function() { doStuff( stuff, 1, 2 ); }, 100 );
That would work in any browser.
Mike Alsup schrieb:
This is a plugin for anyone who has an occasional need to simulate
synchronous ajax. Sync ajax locks the entire browser which is never a
good idea. This plugin can block and unblock user interaction on
demand. A demo can be found here:
On 12/27/06, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not only not related to jQuery, but not related to closures either. :-)
The problem is that setTimeout doesn't accept the additional arguments you
are passing it.
Is there any reason you can't do this:
setTimeout( function() { doStuff(
Why not: $.blockUI()? Like that it's clearer that it is a global function,
Good question. I guess I envisioned potential usage like:
$('#myDiv').hide().blockUI().load('stuff.php', function() {
$(this).fadeIn().unblockUI();
});
___
jQuery mailing
hey, i'd like to know if i'm doing something wrong. Check this:
table
thead
tr
td1/td
td2/td
/tr
/thead
tbody
tr
td1/td
td2/td
/tr
/tbody
tfoot
tr
td colspan=2products found: #que.recordCount#/td
/tr
/tfoot
/table
When i try to sort it, firebug tells me:
tbl.sorter.js (line 292) : o
I'm not sure if this will help, but you're supposed to use th, not td, in
tfoot.
-- Yehuda
On 12/27/06, Rafael Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey, i'd like to know if i'm doing something wrong. Check this:
table
thead
tr
td1/td
td2/td
/tr
/thead
tbody
tr
td1/td
td2/td
/tr
/tbody
Hi,
Try upgrading to the latest version, this issue should be fixed.
The latest version is available here:
http://jquery.com/dev/svn/trunk/plugins/tablesorter/jquery.tablesorter.js?format=raw
/christian
Rafael Santos wrote:
hey, i'd like to know if i'm doing something wrong. Check this:
Is there any support for this or a plugin that brings this functionality
over to the firefox/non IE land? (Never thought I'd be saying that...)
-js
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hi there!
Use $(expr).hover() for that!
Usage: $(element).hover(function() { //Mouseover }, function(){ //Mouseout
})
2006/12/27, Jonathan Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there any support for this or a plugin that brings this functionality
over to the firefox/non IE land? (Never thought I'd be
I've been doing this same thing manually too. It'll be nice to have a
plug-in. In a few of mine though, the message is actually a percentage
counter letting the user know what portion of the page has been built.
Hmm... I wonder if I can work that in some how.
Good work though, Mike.
Cheers,
hey, How could I disable one or more td on the head when i click on it??
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hi Mike,
I definitely like this and I can see its applicability in the use of
things such as online order submissions where you want the order to
complete before the user moves on.
Rey...
On 12/26/06, *Mike Alsup* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a plugin
What do you mean specifically? The most recent tablesorter includes a patch
I wrote that allows you to pass a jQuery object, DOM node, or DOM node array
to disableHeaders.
-- Yehuda
On 12/27/06, Rafael Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey, How could I disable one or more td on the head when i
Mike..
I don't think that it's correct to say that it's never a good idea to lock
the entire browser. One of the benefits of AJAX is that the browser allows
you to code an application in the browser which behaves more like a
traditional app.
And there are plenty of times when the user would
totally wrong question ive made , sorry..
I was wondering how how could i set the parameter sortColumn for two or more
column, i have 4 columns the last one souldnt be sortable, u know... thx
2006/12/27, Yehuda Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What do you mean specifically? The most recent tablesorter
Like I said, use the disableHeader param. Pass it:
* A numerical index with the col #
* An id
* A DOM node
* A jQuery object containing DOM nodes
* An array containing DOM nodes
-- Yehuda
On 12/27/06, Rafael Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
totally wrong question ive made , sorry..
I was
On 12/27/06, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the benefits of AJAX is that the browser allows
you to code an application in the browser which behaves more like a
traditional app.
I don't think that's what he was referring to. I think he was referring to
the fact that the browser
Another possible improvement would be to genericize the work I did on the
speed test.
Specifically, to avoid browser lockup, I did the following:
* I pass a list of DOM Elements to a function
* That function executes something on the first item, and when it's done,
passes the same list with the
Anyone know of a jQuery slider, similar to this YUI Slider:
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/slider/index.html
Dave
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Similar:
http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos
scroll down to Sliders
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Dec 27, 2006, at 1:30 PM, David Moshal wrote:
Anyone know of a jQuery slider, similar to this YUI Slider:
I don't think that's what he was referring to. I think he was referring to
the fact that the browser actually *freezes* (as in it registers as Not
Responding in the Windows Task Manager) during syncronous AJAX.
Thanks, Aaron. Yes, that's exactly what I meant. I should have
emphasized that
I've been doing this same thing manually too. It'll be nice to have a
plug-in. In a few of mine though, the message is actually a percentage
counter letting the user know what portion of the page has been built.
Hmm... I wonder if I can work that in some how.
Hi Christopher,
I have an
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:52:49AM -0800, Michael Geary wrote:
Not only not related to jQuery, but not related to closures either. :-)
hrmbl, but it was such a nice keyword... ;)
The problem is that setTimeout doesn't accept the additional arguments you
are passing it.
Is there
nice, works in all browsers, solved my immediate problem.
thank you! :)
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:09:33PM +0100, Choan C. Gálvez wrote:
I was intrigued by the syntax used by Moe, as I had never seen it.
It's documented at
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/DOM:window.setTimeout, stating:
this doesn't work like a local variable. Inside a nested function, this
is not the same as in the outer function. That's what is messing things up.
If I understand your code, you can write it more simply like this:
(function($) {
$.fn.Tooltip = function(settings) {
var $all = this;
Gotcha...thanks for clarifying.
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
certified advanced coldfusion programmer
ICGLink, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.370.1530 x737
--//-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike
Cool Mike. Thanks! :o)
Cheers,
Chris
Mike Alsup wrote:
I've been doing this same thing manually too. It'll be nice to have a
plug-in. In a few of mine though, the message is actually a percentage
counter letting the user know what portion of the page has been built.
Hmm... I wonder if I can
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 11:25:20AM -0800, Michael Geary wrote:
this doesn't work like a local variable. Inside a nested function, this
is not the same as in the outer function. That's what is messing things up.
If I understand your code, you can write it more simply like this:
(function($)
Having reported bug #552 ( http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/552/ ), I'm trying
to find a solution.
Does anyone know how to detect whether $().css('backgroundColor') is
returning an inline rule or a proper CSS styling? When it's an inline rule,
the inline color needs to be set back to its original
I found this thread from a few months ago:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@jquery.com/msg03955.html
I have a few dom elements that are going to get updated via ajax and I need
to unattach the events from them possibly (just the events I've attached).
Is there an unhover method in the works?
I think I've figured out the inline vs. applied thing. This is what I'm
using:
z.el.get(0).style.backgroundColor == z.oldStyle.backgroundColor
I'd still like help with the opacity, though.
--
View this message in context:
I'm working on a CMS for a client. I'm building a newsletter manager where
they can type in various attributes of the newsletter as a whole, then add
articles on a need basis.
I'm going to have the following fields:
Type (select box with 4 options)
Title (one sentence at most)
SubTitle (one
I'm going to work on this myself, but I wondered if anyone had suggestions
for the best way to accomplish this.
I'd use the form plugin! :-) And maybe have the server return a
json object like:
{ title: the new title, sortOrder: 1 }
The script could be something like this:
On Dec 22, 2006, at 15:04, Mika Tuupola wrote:
Latest isortables.js downloaded from http://interface.eyecon.ro/ (can
not tell excact version since source code does not have revision
tags) seems to have a bug. Callback defined by onchange option never
gets called. Using older version
Long time lurker, first time poster. I've searched a bit, and haven't
found exactly what I need. I was wondering if someone here could help.
I want to make an unobtrusive bit of Javascript that will replace all
submit buttons with a text link (that I can style) that will submit
the form.
I
I finally got around to building a run sequentially plugin:
jQuery.sequence = {
setTimeoutH: function(f, t) {
var params = (arguments.length == 3 arguments[2].constructor ==
Array) ? arguments[2] : jQuery.merge([], arguments).slice(2);
window.setTimeout(function() { f.apply(f, params) },
I'll bet it'll work with $(this).prev().click().
Phil Oye wrote:
I want to make an unobtrusive bit of Javascript that will replace all
submit buttons with a text link (that I can style) that will submit
the form.
. . . It should just submit the parent form.
This is the code that
Can you give me a pointer to fix this?
$(':submit').each(function() {
var form = this.form;
var b = $('a href=# class=buttonButton Text/a);
$(this).after(b).hide();
b.click(function() {
form.submit();
return false;
});
});
Very cool, Kevin. I also like that the performance is still there even
though you're deriving the translation from Google.
I'll play with it some more and give you some feedback.
Rey
Kevin Pirkl wrote:
Localization and language translation services in web pages are sorely
under-represented
Yeah, it does sound like that's the case - here's an alternate
solution that does not assume that the form is the parent:
$(a href='' class='button'ButtonText/a)
.click(function() { $(this).parents(form)[0].submit(); return false; })
.insertAfter('input:submit');
--John
On 12/27/06, Yehuda
This translate is awesome.
I get permission denied line 1894 but it still works (tried using the demo)
This is good
Bruce Prochnau
bkdesign solutions
- Original Message -
From: Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jQuery Discussion. discuss@jquery.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Ok, now I'm perplexed.
Originally, the submit button was in a fieldset. But even when I take
it out, and make it a direct child of the form itself, I get an error
that reads:
this.parentNode.submit is not a function.
or
form.submit is not a function.
When I click the text link,
If you're still around, feel free to IM me at outlookeic.
-- Yehuda
On 12/27/06, Phil Oye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, now I'm perplexed.
Originally, the submit button was in a fieldset. But even when I take
it out, and make it a direct child of the form itself, I get an error
that reads:
ummm, ok
Anyone know how to remove the script error in ie?
Otherwise great :)
Bruce Prochnau
bkdesign
Previous:
This translate is awesome.
I get permission denied line 1894 but it still works (tried using the demo)
This is good
Bruce Prochnau
bkdesign solutions
- Original Message -
44 matches
Mail list logo
