Glen,
Does this still work for Opera. It seems to work OK w/ Firefox, but I'm
having a hard time getting it to work on Opera 9.10 for OSX. Even
http://empireenterprises.com/_comet.html is not working as expected for me
in Opera.
It never seems to get into xmlhttp.readyState == 3 for some
On which browser and on which operating system did this occur?
On 3/12/07, John Cherouvim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I typed the following piece of code (which is wrong) and my browser froze:
$('input{type=submit}').css(background, red);
Just wanted to let you know.
Thanks,
Ioannis
Hpricot is my favorite HTML parser in the whole world, and its API was
influenced by jQuery.
Check it out: http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/hpricot/
On 2/24/07, howard chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone think that it would be great to use jQuery in server side?
such as grab html from
pages. I'm glad
that UJS for Rails exists so that Rails programmers can more easily
separate their Javascript from their HTML.
PS: Sorry about the nightmares. ;-)
On 1/25/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Beppu wrote:
I'd like to also add that Unobtrusive Javascript is just cleaner
I'd like to also add that Unobtrusive Javascript is just cleaner and
easier to understand than the alternative.
When I try to analyze a page that has tons of Javascript mixed with
HTML, it can be very difficult see what's going on. Contrast that
with the unobtrusive approach where you can use
I wanted to try to use Prototype and jQuery together, also, but it didn't work out too well for me.The main show stopper was that a lot of Prototype-based code will assume that the result of $() will be a DOM element. With jQuery's $(), you will usually get a jQuery object back (so you can do all
This may be slightly off-topic, but I'm curious about the changes you made to prototype. What aspect of its DOM manipulation did you find lacking?On 8/31/06,
Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a long time prototype user and have had a love/hate relationship with it. I've spent a lot of
I was playing around with jQuery today, and I came across something unfortunate.
I was in the habit of using the . character in id attributes. For
example, if I had a page full of notes, the mark-up might look like:
div class=note id=note.33rd note/div
div class=note id=note.44th note/div
