I'm working with the fade and slide animations now, and while testing I've
hit a couple of points where an element tried to slideIn when it was already
... in, and fadeOut when it was already...out. In both cases the animation
starts from the beginning, fully hiding the element and sliding it in
Could you create a ticket for this? Otherwise it's just going to get lost.
http://dev.jquery.com/
--John
On 3/15/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working with the fade and slide animations now, and while testing I've
hit a couple of points where an element tried to slideIn when it was
That is to say that this has been brought up before, but was forgotten
again. It seems like a reasonable idea for most of the show/hide
animations, but I'm not entirely sure if it's as simple as you make it
out to be. Some users may rely upon the current behavior, and changing
that will effect
Hmm - I'm not sure how or why someone would rely on a hidden element
appearing instantaneously and then animating back to its original state. I
suppose it's possible, but those have to be rare enough cases that the
benefits to new jQuery converts would take precedence.
Things like animate,
Perfect - if you could just add the same fitering to slideIn, slideOut,
fadeIn and fadeOut we're there. I'm glad there is a precedent.
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Daemach schrieb:
Hmm - I'm not sure how or why someone would rely on a hidden element
appearing instantaneously and then animating
Hi Daemach,
I came across the same problem and agree that it is counter-intuitive.
In the meantime I have implemented a filter on the visibility of the
element before calling the function. e.g. $(#myDiv:visible).slideUp();
Regards,
David
Daemach wrote:
I'm working with the fade and
What a simple and elegant solution ;) I do hope this will be addressed still
to make the library work more intuitively but this saves me from doing an if
statement.
I love this list...
David-310 wrote:
Hi Daemach,
I came across the same problem and agree that it is counter-intuitive.
