Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
Yes, that is already useful! But it still depends on the form to be
submitted. Would be cool to have single fields validated on blur. That
would of course be useful for client-side validation as well. Maybe its
already implemented? I'm not
13, 2007 9:16 AM
To: 'jQuery Discussion.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Hi, Jim...
I'm glad you've got some weather to enjoy your motorcycle.
I'm not the kind of cyclist... I'm talking about a road bicycle.
Trying to keep in shape as I get older! ;o)
Anyone
] On
Behalf Of Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:15 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Heh - I've been riding motorcycles for ages with no mishaps - 2 weeks
ago I'm riding bikes with my daughter and take a header into the street
all CF'ers... et al...
Rick, I'll see if I can make time for this tonight... It's
65 outside and
my road bike beckons seductively from the garage.
Unfortunately my desire
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
Paul schrieb:
What you described is basically what I do, Rick--not because Jorn's plugin
didn't work but because many of my form fields are validated against each
other, and database interaction is required to make that decision. (e.g.,
the
Paul schrieb:
It would normally be smart, Klaus, but in my case not much would be gained.
I'm building an intranet app, and at 100 mps the ajax calls come back
extremely quickly. (truthfully I've yet to see my spinny graphic show
up...)
So why wouldn't there be gained much? You could still
.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Rick, I'll see if I can make time for this tonight... It's
65 outside and
my road bike beckons seductively from the garage.
Unfortunately my desire
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss
);
})
}
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 11:26 PM
To: 'jQuery Discussion.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Okay as promised Will, here's what I do. It's most certainly
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
Yes, that is already useful! But it still depends on the form to be
submitted. Would be cool to have single fields validated on blur. That
would of course be useful for client-side validation as well. Maybe its
already implemented? I'm not uptodate with that.
supposed to work during such beautiful spring weather??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:00 AM
To: 'jQuery Discussion.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Hi, Paul...
Enjoy
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:36 PM
To: 'jQuery Discussion.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Wow, CF 4.5? That's the version I learned on--you're really old school!
I'm not sure the best way to implement what json.cfc does without
Hi, guys...
I usually do all my validation using CF, by submitting
a form back to the page it's on, however, I thought I'd
give jQuery a crack at validation. While it works fine
for the functions that are built-in, they are somewhat limited in function
and I quickly get lost in a lot of code
: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Hi, guys...
I usually do all my validation using CF, by submitting
a form back to the page it's on, however, I thought I'd
give jQuery a crack at validation. While it works fine
for the functions that are built-in, they are somewhat limited in function
and I
Sure you can. You can use ajax for anything you want.
On the currency validation why can't you replace anything that is not a
number or a decimal with ? That should give you a valid number to
validate.
validate ele.value.replace(/[^0-9\.]/g,)
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, guys...
I
: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
What you described is basically what I do, Rick--not because Jorn's plugin
didn't work but because many of my form fields are validated against each
other, and database interaction is required to make that decision. (e.g.,
the validity of field Y depends
Paul schrieb:
What you described is basically what I do, Rick--not because Jorn's plugin
didn't work but because many of my form fields are validated against each
other, and database interaction is required to make that decision. (e.g.,
the validity of field Y depends on the value already
] On
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 6:02 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
The good thing about such an approach is, that you have to implement
server-side validation anyway - client-side validation can never be more
than an addon
on the client side and cf on the server side?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daemach
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 5:47 PM
To: discuss@jquery.com
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Sure you can. You can use ajax
figure
it out from there.
Thanks for all your help!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 5:44 PM
To: 'jQuery Discussion.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
What you described is basically
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Klaus Hartl
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 3:02 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Paul schrieb:
What you described is basically what I do, Rick--not because Jorn's plugin
didn't work but because many of my form fields are validated
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
Paul schrieb:
What you described is basically what I do, Rick--not because Jorn's plugin
didn't work but because many of my form fields are validated against each
other, and database interaction is required to make that decision. (e.g.,
the validity of field Y depends
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 3:35 PM
To: 'jQuery Discussion.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Paul, could I impose upon you to strip your example code
down to handling one field? I don't understand everything you've
got there, and what it all
Sounds good to me, but I'm not knowledgeable or experienced
enough with all this to evaluate an approach.
The biggest concern I have, especially when it comes to logins
and validation, is that a person might have js turned off (although
my stats show that is a tiny amount, less than 1 percent of
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 7:08 PM
To: 'jQuery Discussion.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Rick, I'll see if I can make time for this tonight... It's 65 outside and
my road bike beckons seductively from the garage
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 3:35 PM
To: 'jQuery Discussion.'
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Calling all CF'ers... et al...
Paul, could I impose upon you to strip your example code
down to handling one field? I
25 matches
Mail list logo
