[jQuery] Is returned Javascript code actually executed?

2006-11-01 Thread jyl
Hi Everyone http://fjsoftllc.com/page.html Is my lame attempt to invoke a PHP via jQuery, and it works, except that the embedded script.../script element seems to have no effect, isnt executed. Any ideas? Thanks! --Jacob ___ jQuery mailing list

Re: [jQuery] Is returned Javascript code actually executed?

2006-11-01 Thread Klaus Hartl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi Everyone http://fjsoftllc.com/page.html Is my lame attempt to invoke a PHP via jQuery, and it works, except that the embedded script.../script element seems to have no effect, isnt executed. Any ideas? Thanks! --Jacob Hi Jacob, automatic evaluation

Re: [jQuery] Is returned Javascript code actually executed?

2006-11-01 Thread jyl
OK so thats a shame :). I'd have hoped that get would work, since I need to do a get (I want to keep the flexibility of applying a function to the returned data and updating more than one element) and also having the embedded javascript inside HTML being executed Is this a feature that get

Re: [jQuery] Is returned Javascript code actually executed?

2006-11-01 Thread jyl
I verified that the .load method does execute the embedded Javascript, it works in IE7 and FF. Now, how do I get access to the loaded value.. If I could have that then fine, I can switch to using .load... --Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi Everyone http://fjsoftllc.com/page.html Is my

Re: [jQuery] Is returned Javascript code actually executed?

2006-11-01 Thread Klaus Hartl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: OK so thats a shame :). I'd have hoped that get would work, since I need to do a get (I want to keep the flexibility of applying a function to the returned data and updating more than one element) and also having the embedded javascript inside HTML being executed

Re: [jQuery] Is returned Javascript code actually executed?

2006-11-01 Thread jyl
Thanks, thats what I'll do. The documentation does not explicitly guide you to use .ajax in preference to the other functions, but a second read (plus your email) made it clear thats the way to go. --Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: OK so thats a shame :). I'd have hoped that get would work,