Hi Faust,
Nice work! I suggest however that you change order of the parameters to
path format. This is more logic.
I have only tested this with Firefox 1.5 and IE 6. ppk warned that IE
on Windows does /not/ fire the |onload| event of cached images. I did
not notice any problems when
Good suggestions John as always. .in() can't be done because 'in' is a
JS keyword and I wouldn't want to have to call it like $()['in']() all
the time. So I figured two JS keywords smashed together would work and
chose .doin() as the function name; if you have any better ideas (maybe
I have a sample of code that works in Firefox but not IE (6).
jQuery code:
$.post(xml_listbox.php,{
table: link_category,
value: cat_id,
label: cat_name
},function(xml){
$(options/option,xml).each(
function()
{
just found another example
YUI this time
http://blog.davglass.com/files/yui/gestures/
On 10/2/06, Dan Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/
Armand Datema wrote:
there was a good script once that used mouse gestures
it was from a dutch guy his site was
That looks like it determines the position of the mouse on the page on
mouseDown, and then has a look on mouseUp and does a calculation with a
tolerance for minute movements.
I'm guessing it's that simple, because you can trick it by holding the mouse
button down (keeping it still) but moving
Title: Message
$(document).ready(/* define
the jQuery page constructor */function() {// store a
list of all the existing leases per rowvar rows =
[];// for each form with the id of "frm_existingLeases" get the
list of divs with the class "row" that are the children of the div with the
I found this works...
alert(this.attributes.getNamedItem(val).value + +
this.firstChild.nodeValue);
is there anything simpler - more jQuery-like?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Howdy!
Consider the following two pieces of code:
function someFunction() {
var params =
{
name: John,
surname: Doe
};
$.post(save.html,
params, function(data) {
alert(data);
});
}
This works just fine
The following piece of code doesnt:
function
var params = new
Array():Probably a typo, but I thought I'd mention it.
Possibly {} creates an object not an array? In which case changevar params = new
Array();tovar params = new Object();
BlairOn 10/20/06, Miel Soeterbroek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy!
Consider the following
Miel Soeterbroek schreef:
Howdy!
Consider the following two pieces of code:
function someFunction() {
var params = {
name: ‘John’,
surname: ‘Doe’
};
$.post(‘save.html’, params, function(data) {
alert(data);
});
}
This works just fine…
The following piece of code doesn’t:
Thanks Blair, changing Array to
Object did the trick
And indeed, the : was
just a typo
David, I use the extend
functionality all over the place already, however, in this case there is no
default set of values. Unset parameters will just arrive as null on the server.
var params = new
Once again, I have an 11th hour code change. I had forgotten about
Jörn's suggestion of allowing additional passed arguments. I'm not
entirely sure what kind of implementation or usage was expected but I
added my own version. Any argument provided to the .doin()/.every()
function beyond the
The latest version of my plugin is available at (those on Google Pages
are no longer updated):
http://www.texotela.co.uk/code/jquery/jQIR/
I use 'format' first as the second parameter 'path' is now optional
(leave it blank to have no path prepended).
I don't use image.onload due to it not firing
Andrew Chalkley schrieb:
I found this works...
alert(this.attributes.getNamedItem(val).value + +
this.firstChild.nodeValue);
is there anything simpler - more jQuery-like?
Hi Andrew, not yet, the bug you found is a known one and popped up on
this list several times. Work is
Miel Soeterbroek schrieb:
Thanks Blair, changing Array to Object did the trick…
And indeed, the : was just a typo…
David, I use the extend functionality all over the place already,
however, in this case there is no default set of values. Unset
parameters will just arrive as null
I'm sure most everyone knows by now that IE 7 has been officially
released but I just wanted to ensure that everyone knows that last
night, MS began pushing out IE 7 via Windows Update.
I received an update notification via the automatic updates option so
I'm sure a ton of other people did as
Do you have a link to a (non)working example that you can put on the web?
bmckenzie wrote:
Hello.
I've run into a problem combining two plugins. When displaying a page
that uses the extended tabs plugin jq-tabs v 0.9
(http://jquery.com/docs/Plugins/ExtendedTabs/) in an iframe
created
Hi jQuerians,
I worked on the tabs plugin, did some clean up and changed the API a
little bit, so that I call it v2.0 now:
* to pass in the initial tab to start with you no longer specify it with
an on option. Instead you pass the number as first parameter to the
tabs() function (that's the
Hi Dave,
Yep, I updated my IE7 RC1 to the full release via Windows Update just
last night. I don't know if the beta triggered it. I'll look on one of
my other PCs thats running IE6 to see if IE7 is available via Windows
Update. If anything, if you're using IE6, just run Windows Update and
see
I'm sure most everyone knows by now that IE 7 has been officially
released but I just wanted to ensure that everyone knows that last
night, MS began pushing out IE 7 via Windows Update.
Whoa, are you sure about that? Microsoft said just yesterday that it
wouldn't happen until November:
What, no link?!?! You're slacking, Klaus! ;o)
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Hi jQuerians,
I worked on the tabs plugin, did some clean up and changed the API a
little bit, so that I call it v2.0 now:
* to pass in the initial tab to start with you no longer specify it with
an on option. Instead you
Is there a jQuery method or plugin for parsing the browser's query string into
an object?
I looked through the api and did a bit of searching around, but no luck ...
Thanks,
Luke
--
zinc Roe Design
www.zincroe.com
(647) 477-6016
___
jQuery mailing
Sorry Rey, here's the link:
http://stilbuero.de/jquery/tabs :)
I knew you'd come through. You da man. ;)
Rey
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I use the latter to keep tabs compatible with jQuery 1.03.
What I meant was, as an official plugin are you required to play by
the same rules as jQuery itself where API changes are reserved for
major releases?
Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
Some feedback on this. In IE7 final, there's some odd behavior. When I
click on a tab, the page shoots up and then resets itself to its
original position. Here's what I mean by this.
Say that that I'm looking at the section of your demo page that says
Slide and Fade Effect Combined and that
Mike Alsup schrieb:
I use the latter to keep tabs compatible with jQuery 1.03.
What I meant was, as an official plugin are you required to play by
the same rules as jQuery itself where API changes are reserved for
major releases?
Not sure if it is called official at all. People asked me to
Rey Bango schrieb:
Some feedback on this. In IE7 final, there's some odd behavior. When I
click on a tab, the page shoots up and then resets itself to its
original position. Here's what I mean by this.
Say that that I'm looking at the section of your demo page that says
Slide and Fade
According to the IE Blog (http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/) timestamped Thursday,
October 19, 2006 8:56 AM:
To help you become more secure and up-to-date, we will distribute IE7 via
Automatic Updates as a high-priority update. We will start very soon with those
of you who are already running IE7
On 20/10/06, Luke Lutman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a jQuery method or plugin for parsing the browser's query string
into an object?
I looked through the api and did a bit of searching around, but no luck ...
Thanks,
Luke
--
zinc Roe Design
www.zincroe.com
(647) 477-6016
You
My pleasure. It works beautifully in FF 1.5.0.7 and looks awesome. I
definitely want to use the plugin.
I'll test it in IE 6 later via another PC.
Rey...
Hi Rey, I know what you're talking about. It's because I want to have
the tabs bookmarkable. Therefore the hash in the URL changes and
Hi Mike -
What I meant was, as an official plugin are you required to play by
the same rules as jQuery itself where API changes are reserved for
major releases?
Until a specific plugin is physically bundled with jQuery directly -
then you're free to run your own versioning and make your own
Hi Klaus,
nice to see a new release.
* Here is an overview of the settings that can be passed in inside the
object literal (shown values are default values):
{
fxFade: null,
fxSlide: null,
fxShow: null,
fxHide: null,
fxSpeed: 'normal',
I forgot to say that if you uncomment the alert, it gives undefined in IE7.
On 10/20/06, Chris Ovenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a problem where fadeOut is undefined in IE7 (final), but
working fine in Firefox (2.0RC3).
The relevant code is:
Luke Lutman schrieb:
I was thinking of something a little fancier ;-)
jQuery.query = function() {
var r = {};
var q = location.search;
q = q.replace(/^\?/,''); // remove the leading ?
q = q.replace(/\$/,''); // remove the trailing
On 10/20/06, Chris Ovenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to say that if you uncomment the alert, it gives undefined in IE7.
alert should read alert(clickBlock.fadeOut); // no 'this'
On 10/20/06, Chris Ovenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a problem where fadeOut is undefined in
Could you also try doing an alert(clickBlock.css) and alert(clickBlock.animate)?
Thanks
--
Brandon Aaron
On 10/20/06, Chris Ovenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/06, Chris Ovenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to say that if you uncomment the alert, it gives undefined in
IE7.
I've started using jQuery in an existing web app and am having some trouble.
The app uses a javascript date selector - click on the little calendar image
and a popup opens; click on the date and it sets a text box value in the
main window then closes itself.
In between updating the text box and
Erik Beeson schrieb:
Without the appendTo, the items aren't removed, but they aren't
reordered either. This is something about the 'adding items in a
different order replaces the old version' DOM feature, isn't it?
Without appendTo, only the jQuery object should be sorted. So far the
DOM
Abdur-Rahman Advany schrieb:
Hi guys,
I am trying to figure out how jQuery works internally. There is a stack
maintained within jQuery but why does jQuery change the 'this' array of
objects? why not just pass back the modified array when using things
like find?
The stack allows to
John Resig schrieb:
Hi Mike -
What I meant was, as an official plugin are you required to play by
the same rules as jQuery itself where API changes are reserved for
major releases?
Until a specific plugin is physically bundled with jQuery directly -
then you're free to run your own
Interesting - .css returned a function value, but .animate was
undefined. I'm pretty sure the animation module is in there, though,
as it's working in FF, and indeed (checking) FF returns the expected
function.
On 10/20/06, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you also try doing an
I was working with the event model and I noticed that while some steps
are taken to fix the IE event object some of the cross browser
inconsistancies, it doesn't fix all of them. It doesn't even fix the
most annoying inconsistancies, namely the target and/or srcElement is
not unified. Is there any
fix: function(event) {
if ( event ) {
if( !event.preventDefault ) {
event.preventDefault = function() {
this.returnValue = false;
};
}
if( !event.stopPropagation ) {
I am trying to figure out how jQuery works internally. There is a
stack maintained within jQuery but why does jQuery change the 'this'
array of objects? why not just pass back the modified array when
using things like find?
The stack allows to revert to older states. Check the
Hi Everyone -
There's been some rabble-rousing concerning the destructive nature of
jQuery (it's ok, rousing is a good thing ;-)). I claimed that it'd be
easy to have it exist as a plugin. Well, it took me all of 10 minutes,
but here it is:
jQuery.fn._pushStack = jQuery.fn.pushStack;
Something like this:
$(#wrapper *).hover( ... );
The lets you select all child elements, which is what you want. Enjoy!
--John
How can I attach the hover event to all elements in another element?
For example:
div id=wrapper
h1Hello/h1
pTest hello/p
/div
I
Yeah, YUI uses tons and tons of code, i think it was around half a meg!On 10/20/06, Dan Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:That looks like it determines the position of the mouse on the page on
mouseDown, and then has a look on mouseUp and does a calculation with atolerance for minute movements.I'm
Hi John,Thanks so much for the quick response. That works a treat.Can I take it one step further and only attach it to direct children? e.g the b gets left out (and any other sub sub elements).
TomP.S. JQuery rocks... you're a god. You might actually be the god. ;)On 10/20/06, John Resig
Can I take it one step further and only attach it to direct children?
e.g the b gets left out (and any other sub sub elements).
Yep - $(#foo *) only grabs direct children (which is what you
want). If you want to grab all descendants (children and children of
children and children of
Hi folks,
I need to know if jQuery can return a query result set from an Ajax
call. What's the best way to do this?
Chris
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
That's great... it makes me feel nice.ThanksOn 10/20/06, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I take it one step further and only attach it to direct children? e.g the b gets left out (and any other sub sub elements).
Yep - $(#foo *) only grabs direct children (which is what youwant). If
I re-read this and thought I should maybe clarify my question. I need to
return a query result set to the client side using Ajax. How does jQuery go
about handling that? What's the simplest way of accomplishing this task.
I know that with ajaxCFC I could return a query object from my ColdFusion
Thanks for responding Matt. That's not quite what I'm looking for (I don't
think)...
when I was using ajaxCFC I could return a query object (a result set) and in
return it gave me a javascript object that represented the query as an array
of structures:
query[i].column1
where query is the
I still really dont understand what you mean by a query.On 10/20/06, cjordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I re-read this and thought I should maybe clarify my question. I need toreturn a query result set to the client side using Ajax. How does jQuery go
about handling that? What's the simplest way of
Ohh i think i know what you mean, like a JSON object? For example, the server could respond:{column1:Some data,column2:Some more data,column3:Foobar
}, Which you could then do this:$.get(file.php,function(r) {data = "">alert(data.column1);});Is that what you mean?
On 10/20/06, cjordan [EMAIL
Acctually, jQuery 1.0 and up can handle JSON for you. Try this out:$.getJSON(file.php,function(r) {alert(r.column1);});No need for a plugin. ;)On 10/20/06,
Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chris,You're not going to be able to manipulate a query like you would inAjaxCFC since AjaxCFC is a CF
On 10/20/06, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and then use the JSON plugin(http://mg.to/2006/01/25/json-for-jquery) to work with the data.Or you could (as of 1.0.2, possibly a bit earlier) do
$.getJSON(file.php,function(r) {alert(r);});See the API docs under G for more info
Hi Matt,
Its the term used to identify a result set in ColdFusion. Its what a SQL
query returns when ColdFusion executes a standard SQL query.
Rey...
Matt Stith wrote:
I still really dont understand what you mean by a query.
On 10/20/06, *cjordan* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Aaron!
Rey...
Aaron Heimlich wrote:
On 10/20/06, *Rey Bango* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
and then use the JSON plugin
(http://mg.to/2006/01/25/json-for-jquery) to work with the data.
Or you could (as of 1.0.2, possibly a bit earlier) do
On 10/20/06, Matt Stith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Acctually, jQuery 1.0 and up can handle JSON for you. Try this out:Ah. I knew $.getJSON was available before 1.0.2, just couldn't remember when.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
Even better. :o)
Rey...
Matt Stith wrote:
Acctually, jQuery 1.0 and up can handle JSON for you. Try this out:
$.getJSON(file.php,function(r) {
alert(r.column1);
});
No need for a plugin. ;)
On 10/20/06, *Rey Bango* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 10/20/06, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Aaron!Rey...Your welcome, dude. Happy to help!
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I have just found jQuery today and started using it. Very nice. I am
looking to change the values in one combo box based on the choice in
another combo box. Does jQuery have something like that or something
similiar that you can point me to?
Thanks!
Robert
You should head over to http://www.json.org. Towards the bottom of the page, there are links to JSON encoders written in many different languages (I'm guessing you would want one of the ColdFusion ones).
On 10/20/06, cjordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Replys galore! I feel so loved, now!
Chris,
You're going to need to send the query back as a JSON packet. Use the
link that I sent for CFJson to convert your query to JSON.
Rey...
cjordan wrote:
Wow! Replys galore! I feel so loved, now! :-D
Thanks for the tips guys. JSON sounds like what I want then. I'll give that
a search
good to note the difference, Mike. For my current
purpose, single domain is fine. Thanks for the tip! :)
Chris
Michael Geary wrote:
From Rey Bango:
and then use the JSON plugin
(http://mg.to/2006/01/25/json-for-jquery) to work with the data.
From: Aaron
I finally got around to setting up a build environment here. With revision
453 I am seeing errors in $.find (sibling axis tests) and several of the
ajax functions. Ideas?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Just an optimization, but it would be good to have the
.destructiveMethod(selector, function) case not create a new object since it
doesn't (permanently) change the original object. It looks like _pushStack
will stack the old jQuery object's nodes in the new jQuery object, which it
won't use.
How do I get the id of the item which was just clicked?
For instance, if a user clicks a td which has a specific id, how do I use
this id in my script?
$(document).ready(function() {
$(td).click(function() {
// get the id of the table cell clicked
// use the id in a
Something like this:
$(document).ready(function() {
$(td).click(function() {
var id = this.id;
// now do stuff with id!
});
});
--John
How do I get the id of the item which was just clicked?
For instance, if a user clicks a td which has a specific id, how
Yup - can't tell if it's when there are certain timeouts running or
not. It even happens when all I've done is declared a
$(document).ready() with nothing in it.
W2K
Firefox 1.5.0.7
jQuery 1.0.2
-- mike
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
you have debugger enabled in firebug? I had a similar problem.
On
Just to make sure the users of ifxshake know (along with Stefan), there is a
bug on line 37 of ifxshake.js. This bug causes the failure of the callback
function.
The simple fix: switch z.callback = z.callback; with z.callback =
callback;.
Thanks Stefan for Interface!
-Aaron
--
View this
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
Talking about verbosity, isn't fxFade and fxSlide and fxShow and fxHide
somewhat verbose?
Jörn, I think not. If I've had that documented already you would know
why not :-)
Cool.
I already tried that with my new history/hijax plugin. But I had the
need
Dave Methvin schrieb:
I finally got around to setting up a build environment here. With revision
453 I am seeing errors in $.find (sibling axis tests) and several of the
ajax functions. Ideas?
Those weird errors seem to be related to a change to attr. It seems to
occur when using
Robert schreef:
I have just found jQuery today and started using it. Very nice. I am
looking to change the values in one combo box based on the choice in
another combo box. Does jQuery have something like that or something
similiar that you can point me to?
quick code here so it may not
http://www.hiveminds.co.uk/node/3141
It's an article about how lite programming is becoming a trend. By that
they mean less resources and smaller filesizes. jQuery get mentioned
as one of the lite libraries.
Too bad they got the url wrong.
David
Keep in mind that this refers to the element on which the event is
being handled, NOT the element that originated the event. See
http://www.quirksmode.org/js/events_order.html for an explaination of
how events are captured and
http://www.quirksmode.org/js/events_properties.html for good measure.
Fixed. I just setup jquery.net and .org to both redirect to jquery.com
(good thing I already own them!) Thanks for the heads up!
--John
On 10/20/06, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.hiveminds.co.uk/node/3141
It's an article about how lite programming is becoming a trend. By that
Dave -
Are you running this on a local machine? I had a similar problem too
until I realized that the test suite refers to PHP files and such that
can only be run on a web server. That's something that needs to be
kept in mind when running them.
--John
On 10/20/06, Dave Methvin [EMAIL
Michael Geary wrote:
You can simplify that code quite a bit. every() and doin() are nearly
identical, so they can both call a common implementation. Ditto for the two
inner loops in stop().
Great suggestions Mike. I noticed that they were very similar but I was
too lazy to combine them but
On 10/20/06, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert schreef:
I have just found jQuery today and started using it. Very nice. I am
looking to change the values in one combo box based on the choice in
another combo box. Does jQuery have something like that or something
similiar that you can
If you're not in a rush, I have just started to convert my own cropper,
previously written just in javascript (not using any of the libraries).
But it will take a few weeks, being a side project and being my first
jQuery project.
A demonstration of the cropper can be viewed here (click the
On Oct 20, 2006, at 7:31 PM, John Resig wrote:
Are you running this on a local machine? I had a similar problem too
until I realized that the test suite refers to PHP files and such that
can only be run on a web server. That's something that needs to be
kept in mind when running them.
On 10/20/06, Adam van den Hoven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if (e.target.nodeType == 3) { // defeat Safari bug
e.target = e.target.parentNode;
}
as I don't know whether or not some strange side effects might occur.
I suspect not, but I was being cautious.
The target property is
Ok, this is weird. When I ran the test suite in Firefox 1.5, I got:
Tests completed in 11578 milliseconds.
0 tests of 242 failed.
Then I ran it in Safari 2.0.4, and Safari crashed. Tried it three
times, got the same result.
Has anyone else had this problem with running the tests on Safari?
85 matches
Mail list logo
