[jQuery] new plugin: window (+DEMO)

Hi guys, After i've done a lot (+8 weeks!) of work on the window class it's now ready to be released to the public for beta testing. I'm hoping to release this plugin at the same time jQuery 1.1 becomes available, but all bugs have to be squised off course. The plugin makes use of my cssHover

Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.1 by the end of Nov

Fully agree! Providing a full release for newbies and as reference for documentation on the one hand and a custom build for further needs should be just fine. As soon as you are familiar enough with jQuery tp use the custom build, you won't worry about missing methods referenced in the

Re: [jQuery] $.val() limited in functionality?

I'd propose something like $().fieldValue() and $().fieldSerialize be added to the form plugin. Both could take an optional successful only argument indicating if non-successful controls should be ignored. fieldValue() would return the value of the first matched element, in array form if

Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.1 by the end of Nov

Personally, 19k is tiny to me compared to the others out there. Even 25k would be tiny still. However, I think the form handling is something that makes sense to rely on a plugin. My personal goal for jQuery is to have it be smaller in size (compressed) than Prototype (compressed) and

Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.1 by the end of Nov

I could probably do a run through of the code and reduce the size of the download by a couple hundred KB, no problem. couple hundred BYTES! That'd be one heck of an optimization! --John ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com

Re: [jQuery] new plugin: window (+DEMO)

After i've done a lot (+8 weeks!) of work on the window class it's now ready to be released to the public for beta testing. I'm hoping to release this plugin at the same time jQuery 1.1 becomes available, but all bugs have to be squised off course. Well, whatever may come, you were quite

Re: [jQuery] jQuery Methods, a new plugin?

I still think that using a namespace and providing a short cut like $A is the best way to handle this, instead of extending the element or prototype. I think we could even get chaining to work properly if we really wanted too. We could also probably provide a way to extend the prototype if

Re: [jQuery] $.val() limited in functionality?

That sounds like a good solution to me. It puts the form code with other form code. I just started using the form plugin today and noticed that it doesn't pass along the error callback in ajaxSubmit. I've changed my local copy but I suspect others might want that as well. That's a great

Re: [jQuery] $.val() limited in functionality?

That sounds like a good solution to me. It puts the form code with other form code. I just started using the form plugin today and noticed that it doesn't pass along the error callback in ajaxSubmit. I've changed my local copy but I suspect others might want that as well. That's a

RE: [jQuery] [jQuery-es] Cambiar cosas cuando la página cargue

Hola nuevamente David y Choan: Por más que leo y miro el código no logro entenderlo pues soy un poco novato con jQuery y de Javascript no se mucho, lo he usado un poco en validaciones pero con el boom de la Web2.0 veo que se pueden hacer cosas increíbles. ¿Me pueden dar un norte para guiarme y

[jQuery] Next generation WYSIWYG editor... maybe? am I missing something?

Hi everyone, I've been getting increasingly frustrated by the flexibility and output from all of the WYSIWYG editors available for the web so I want to try and build an editor experience for our 2nd generation of CMS that will achieve the following: - Integrate in to our sites without

Re: [jQuery] Next generation WYSIWYG editor... maybe? am I missing something?

Ok, it's very simple indeed, and doesn't actually let you edit anything!! However, the idea is that you can designate a div as the 'editor' and then within this you can drop elements (I would imagine having a drop zone at the bottom?) for example: - p tag - h1-h4 etc - ul -

<    1   2