Novell-developer Michael Meeks finds strong words for Sun's
management of the free office suite in an interview - Pushes for own
OOo flavor
http://derstandard.at/?url=/?id=1216917892794
--
Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:43:59 -0500, M. Fioretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Novell-developer Michael Meeks finds strong words for Sun's
management of the free office suite in an interview - Pushes for own
OOo flavor
http://derstandard.at/?url=/?id=1216917892794
Well I read the interview and
Novell-developer Michael Meeks finds strong words for Sun's
management of the free office suite in an interview - Pushes for own
OOo flavor
http://derstandard.at/?url=/?id=1216917892794
Good reading; thanks.
-
To
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 10:43:20 AM -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Well I read the interview and seems that Michael didn't said
anything we didn't really already know.
that is true, but it's interesting to see certain things covered
outside the usual circles. One thing I appreciated is that
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:13:28 -0500, M. Fioretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This remind me of the conference call we had with management at Sun
and could personally confirm many fears from Sun on topics of
ownership and managing criteria.
Interesting. Would it be possible to know more about
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 11:20:12 AM -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
This remind me of the conference call we had with management at
Sun and could personally confirm many fears from Sun on topics of
ownership and managing criteria.
Interesting. Would it be possible to know more about this?
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:26:47 +0100
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 18:13 +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 10:43:20 AM -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Well I read the interview and seems that Michael didn't said
anything we didn't really already know.
that is
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:55:21 -0500, Michael Adams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually thought IBM was very close to forking it for that reason.
But given the size in MB of IBMs Office Suite offering i am not sure i
want their fork.
IBM forked OOo back in 2003/4 and create a product called
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, M. Fioretti wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:43:59 +0200
From: M. Fioretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: discuss@openoffice.org, M. Fioretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: [discuss] Sun dropping out of OO.o development wouldn't be an
entirely
On 07/28/2008 08:54 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
And, I wonder whether his gogo software, corrupts files, such as the
malicious corruption of HTML files, the same way that Open Office
2.4.x corrupts the files, by maliciously inserting code, against the
wishes of the user, causing vi to be the
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:31:07 -0500, M. Fioretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Huh? What do you mean? HTML created by OOo (or any other office suite,
afaict) is damn ugly and possibly not W3C compliant, but corrupted by
maliciously inserting code???
Actually is pretty compliant just horribly
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, NoOp wrote:
BTW: what on earth does VI have to do with anything regarding OOo?
VI is far superior, for editing (creating and modifying) HTML files, to
using Open Office.
VI does not insert code, change fonts, etc, which Open Office does.
What kind of editor, when
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, M. Fioretti wrote:
as far as I'm concerned, you're really preaching to the choir here :-)
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9594#mpart8
I wasn't aware of that article.
Thank you for that.
One thing of particular concern in that article, and it makes Novell
13 matches
Mail list logo
