PPIG discuss: Software authors and professional programmers

2004-04-04 Thread Richard Bartlett
I am workingas a programming consultantwith Andree Woodcock on the Programming As Reflective Practice project. We are looking atthe category of 'super-programmer' that essentially works on his/her own as an all round software author. I suppose the use of the word 'super' is subjective,

Fw: PPIG discuss: evaluating programmers

2004-09-14 Thread Richard Bartlett
- Original Message - From: Richard Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Derek M Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1:19 PM Subject: Re: PPIG discuss: evaluating programmers With regard to giving programmer applicants on the spot testing - I was once given a little

Re: PPIG discuss: About natural naming

2005-03-03 Thread Richard Bartlett
Having just taken part in a study of highly competent software authors working on their own for a design research pilot study, there is an obvious and conscious tendency in them to use fairly long 'natural' names. Often these names follow well worn conventions that they have become comfortable

Re: PPIG discuss: Competence

2005-03-06 Thread Richard Bartlett
Thanks Matt! My date was screwed up. Feel free to attack ... I could do with a challenging debate. ;-) Instead of attacking you on a study that hasn't even seen the light of day yet, I thought I'd mention that your last two emails to the list both were written on April Fools Day.

Re: PPIG discuss: Competence (was: About natural naming)

2005-03-07 Thread Richard Bartlett
Derek - We asked for volunteers who felt able to program the rudiments of a simple graphics game in three hours. Wow, that's a lot of work in a short time. But then programmers always have unrealistic options of their own ability. So you should end up with a real programmers ;-) Hehe!

Re: PPIG discuss: Competence (was: About natural naming)

2005-03-09 Thread Richard Bartlett
Jacques - Why is it OK for programmers to just code-up software, but it is not OK for architects to just build a house the same way? Because silicon is virtual! The advantages of designing on the fly are immense, because feedback is informing the design. How many carefully constructed paper

Re: PPIG discuss: It's not obsolete, it's just misunderstood

2006-01-30 Thread Richard Bartlett
A wonderful website - well worth the effort! -- PPIG Discuss List (discuss@ppig.org) Discuss admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss Announce admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/announce PPIG

Fw: PPIG discuss: Programmer education ain't what it used to be

2008-01-19 Thread Richard Bartlett
- Original Message - From: Richard Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Luke Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 10:57 PM Subject: Re: PPIG discuss: Programmer education ain't what it used to be Hi PPIG people. This is a topic very dear to my heart at the moment