I am really happy to see this article. I only have one bit of feedback...
"GNUstep has been around since the 1990s, and has re-implemented a
substantial amount of NeXTstep, completely from scratch. "
Could we please stop saying NEXTSTEP? This only furthers the
misunderstanding that GNUstep is
Very nice presentation, thanks.
I'm curently writing on NsCDE and GSDE (in french), and I have a
question:
You've said in a previous paper thet there were really 2 desktop
paradigm on Linux, though many were invented. In this regard, how did
you feel with GSDE ? was it consistent as a
That is OnFlapp's GNUstep Desktop Environment...
https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/06/two_new_debian_desktops/
--
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lpro...@gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
IoM: (+44) 7624
Hello,
bellabs wrote:
Hello RM! Thank you for your hard try and advice! You may have
misunderstood me, I know the expected result of this source code
because I have tested it in linux environment before this, I just want
you to test why that program I have compiled under windows 10 does not
