Problems compiling base: configure aborts testing libffi [RHEL6]

2012-04-05 Thread Frederico Muñoz
Cheers, I'm trying to get my GNUstep environment up in a new installation and I've reached an obstacle early in the process that I can't seem to clear; before opening a bug report (which I will do, of course, if warranted) I would just like to make sure I'm not missing something quite obvious.

Re: Problems compiling base: configure aborts testing libffi [RHEL6]

2012-04-05 Thread Frederico Muñoz
Hello, Thank you for you answer, highly appreciate it. 2012/4/5 Nerijus Baliunas neri...@users.sourceforge.net: On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:56:15 +0100 Frederico Muñoz fsmu...@gmail.com wrote: No problem, it's probably the libffi version - or so I thought. I got libffi-3.0.9, configure make make

Re: Renaissance - how to use Grids?

2010-07-02 Thread Frederico Muñoz
Hi, 2010/7/2 Paul Chany csanyi...@gmail.com: Sorry, I mean here that Renaissance that I get with 'apt-get source' isn't that which recognises gridEmptyCell tag. This Renaissance isn't that from the SVN Renaissance trunk. However the Renaissance from SVN repository isn't 'debinized' that is

Re: GNUstep + Trisquel

2009-08-08 Thread Frederico Muñoz
Hi, I'm a mere spectator, but still... 2009/8/6 Germán Arias ger...@xelalug.org: Some days ago, people of project Trisquel (http://trisquel.info/en) contact me asking to information about GNUstep in spanish. They have just started a project to build a desktop based entirely on GNUstep and

Re: universal binaries

2007-09-17 Thread Frederico Muñoz
it would bring for GNUstep. That doesn't mean that it's not worth having though, it's something I've been keeping an eye on for some time. Regards, Frederico Muñoz ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: universal binaries

2007-09-16 Thread Frederico Muñoz
Hello, On 9/16/07, Graham J Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 16 Sep 2007, at 03:35, Frederico Muñoz wrote: (...) (...)The first block contains the Magic Number. This is how OS X knows what kind of binary its going to try to run. CAFEBABE, is the magic number used for fat binaries

Re: universal binaries

2007-09-16 Thread Frederico Muñoz
Hi, On 9/16/07, Markus Hitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 16.09.2007 um 16:35 schrieb Frederico Muñoz: One possible way would be to use the CPU subtype flag to indicate a CPU+OS pair Once I step slightly away from the name cputype and start to think about architecturetype

Re: universal binaries

2007-09-15 Thread Frederico Muñoz
. Cheers, Frederico Muñoz ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Re: Known MacOS programmer about WO/EOF

2005-03-30 Thread Frederico Muñoz
Hello, On 2005-03-30 10:28:44 +0100 Tabitha McNerney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The momentum behind the Mac seems to be growing. Attention was noted in several blogs and RSS feeds by Paul Graham's blog posted yesterday titled, Return of the Mac ... now combined with the interview with the Wolf the

Re: Installer UI advices

2005-03-16 Thread Frederico Muñoz
On 2005-03-16 15:50:10 + M. Uli Kusterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 10:27 Uhr +0100 16.03.2005, Benoit wrote: It's far more easy to unmount the disk image than to erase a decompressed archive. Not really. On MacOS, you just drag both to the trash. Well, using a DMG you need to drag one

Re: Installer UI advices

2005-03-12 Thread Frederico Muñoz
On 2005-03-11 18:56:12 + Jesse Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, the division between apps and frameworks, libraries, etc in what regards a need for an installer isn't so clearcut. Many apps need to install files to different places, i.e. they are not self contained. They are apps, just not

Installer UI advices

2005-03-10 Thread Frederico Muñoz
Hello all, I'm posting this to -discuss, but if someone things that it would gain from being in -ui don't hesitate to add a Cc. Since most -ui users are also in -discuss this shouldn't be a problem though. As some of you know I'm developing an installer application, with the original name of

Re: Licensing Issues

2005-02-26 Thread Frederico Muñoz
using the GPL and assign the copyright to the FSF at will. I think that you could even do it if you maintained the BSD licence, but inclusion on GNUstep would thus be denied. Cheers, fsmunoz -- Frederico Muñoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Discuss-gnustep

Re: File browser for desktop environment (Was Re: Look and Feel)

2005-02-19 Thread Frederico Muñoz
On 2005-02-19 21:07:04 + Banlu Kemiyatorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:09:51 +0100, Frederico Muñoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (...) I believe it is my responsibility to reply to his mail which was clearly pointing at me. But trust me I didn't intend to counter-attack him

Re: Look and Feel

2005-02-14 Thread Frederico Muñoz
if this sounds harsh or something, it isn't my intention! Just expressing my own views on the subject :) Best regards, fsmunoz -- Frederico Muñoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: Look and Feel

2005-02-14 Thread Frederico Muñoz
:). Your sense of aesthetics and graphical competence is a very valuable contribution at this time. BTW, I would have prefered the scrollbars on the left :) Cheers, fsmunoz -- Frederico Muñoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list

Re: Look and Feel

2005-02-14 Thread Frederico Muñoz
got a scrollbar, that's why it seemd to me that is was on the right :) Cheers, fsmunoz -- Frederico Muñoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Re: Look and Feel

2005-02-13 Thread Frederico Muñoz
Hi, Dom, 2005-02-13 às 17:01 -0600, Jesse Ross escreveu: On the other hand, I wouldn't mind a more modern looking theme for GNUstep on linux, like http://jesseross.com/clients/gnustep/ui/concepts/01/ui.png , in addition to the default NeXT theme. Is is possible to set up some kind