I definitely agree, that was a workable search setup even if it was a
bit slow and awkward. At least it found 89% of what I was looking for.
Dr. Cadwell
Robert merman wrote:
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a
Robert Derman wrote:
Many times I have thought that OOo should dump Collab.net for another
vendor.
Or at least regular software.
/Lars
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands,
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search box at
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html which really
queried the issue database, that is, you enter one or more terms, and
all issues containing this
Hi Drew,
Ok - IMO, the problem may be that on that same page, right at top, is a
link proceed in bold and greenso I'm guessing folks hit the page,
mutter because they wanted to submit an issue and don't like having
another page in the middle there, take 3 seconds to see the nice BOLD
Cor Nouws wrote:
But since appr. 35% of entered issues is not correct (duplicate,
invalid, works for me, wontfix)(*) I doubt that making it more easy to
enter issues really will help the project.
[...]
Hi Cor,
I concur with Patrick others that artificially limiting the inflow
of bugs
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for writing,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (7-10-2009 11:23)
Cor Nouws wrote:
But since appr. 35% of entered issues is not correct (duplicate,
invalid, works for me, wontfix)(*) I doubt that making it more easy to
enter issues really will help the project.
[...]
Hi Cor,
I
Cor Nouws wrote:
But I see, somewhere in your lines above, 'UI'. I did not think along
that line, but had the idea people request a whole new tracker system ...
An more simple IU for quick search, would make it easier to use, yes.
Hi Cor,
yeah, and you put it mildly -
Hi Thorsten,
yeah, and you put it mildly -
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi is an abomination; and the
most important fields, namely summary/description entry, are all the
way down to the bottom ...
All that stuff at the top, like type/component/status, is more than
irrelevant to
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search box at
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html which really
queried the issue database, that is, you enter one or more terms, and
all issues containing this term in the summary (not
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search box at
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html which really
queried the issue database, that is, you enter one or more terms, and
all issues containing this
Drew Jensen wrote:
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search box at
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html which
really
queried the issue database, that is, you enter one or more terms, and
all
Thorsten Behrens wrote (7-10-2009 13:54)
Cor Nouws wrote:
But I see, somewhere in your lines above, 'UI'. I did not think along
that line, but had the idea people request a whole new tracker system ...
An more simple IU for quick search, would make it easier to use, yes.
yeah, and you put
Robert Derman wrote:
For ordinary users, the currant bug reporting system is worse than
worthless! I would suspect that 95% + just give up and never try to
report any bugs using it. If we don't toss it and replace it with
something totally different, the only way we will ever get a
Mike Scott wrote (6-10-2009 9:47)
Robert Derman wrote:
For ordinary users, the currant bug reporting system is worse than
worthless! I would suspect that 95% + just give up and never try to
report any bugs using it. If we don't toss it and replace it with
something totally different,
Dear Cor, and Others,
My feeling about the duplicate is that it would be reduced a lot if
finding equivalent bugs is simplified. Moreover, voting would be easier,
and thus probably help to set up priorities based on quality (user
experience). At this moment, the way priority is established
Good Day Folks:
While I do not often post I joined this list to learn and help where
I could. I too agree that thee bug tracking system is untenable. Over
the past three years I have attempted to report s, count 'em 6 issues,
two in just the past year. At _/*NO TIME*/_ was I able to even
16 matches
Mail list logo
