Re: PPIG discuss: Researchers ignoring the common cases again

2005-06-29 Thread Derek M Jones
Frank, This is quite long, but I'm posting it anyway, because I think there is a bigger picture than the one Derek paints. There is several bigger pictures. I was only attempting to correct the painting on a small piece of them. The quoted article posits a better design for calculators, with

Re: PPIG discuss: Researchers ignoring the common cases again

2005-06-29 Thread Frank Wales
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:23 +0100, Derek M Jones wrote: If one defines numeracy as the ability to manipulate numbers using calculators, then yes this research is applicable to numeracy. Being old fashioned I define numeracy as the ability to manipulate numbers without external aids. I think

Re: PPIG discuss: Researchers ignoring the common cases again

2005-06-29 Thread Derek M Jones
Frank, This is why, for its time, RPN was a better system Ah, ok. I didn't know I was talking to one of 'those people'. Slide rules at dawn? Isn't being good enough the aim of all product development? No; making money is the aim of all product development, No; maximizing return on

Re: PPIG discuss: Researchers ignoring the common cases again

2005-06-29 Thread Russel Winder
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:31 +0100, Derek M Jones wrote: No; making money is the aim of all product development, No; maximizing return on investment is the goal of product investment. Neither of these statements is correct but I guess that debate is for another forum. -- Russel.