to
discussion@acfug.org
To discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Just to be clear the security aspect is of no issue here. I am not
interested in doing this for security.
I agree with those who have posted about the con's of doing image management
in a DB
Probably an easy problem for someone...
I want to put two small images in my database and then output them in
my app, so that they do not constitute additional http requests.
Consider it an experiment - I know that it may seem a bit silly. The
goal is for the entire page to be delivered
Bank - Atlanta
Office (404) 498-8449
Derrick Peavy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/18/2007 09:34 AM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
[ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Probably an easy problem for someone...
I want to put two small
doesn't display images
with such ease, but for a web app...? Thanks.
mf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:16 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I believe there would
.
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:22 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I'm just curious. What are the benefits of storing the image in the db
rather than storing the file on the filesystem and the path in the db? I
mean, for a web page, all you need
-
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *John Mason
*Sent:* Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:16 AM
*To:* discussion@acfug.org
*Subject:* RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I believe there would still be three http requests here. The images would
still be called up in the html like
@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I believe there would still be three http requests here. The images would
still be called up in the html like img src= right? Sorry but in http
that would still create seperate http requests.
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
From: [EMAIL
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Kindly, and with respect to everyone that replied:
1. As I stated, the goal is to reduce http requests, not file sizes. And this
is an experiment, please forgive, but the Why of why I want to do this is
not part of the answer.
2. Don't really need
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Don't get me wrong, I understand it's an experiement and it's fun to try.
1. You're not actually reducing your http requests. -- My main point with this.
3. You can save the image data in the database as a BLOB and output it onto a
page. You'll need
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fennell, Mark P.
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Additionally, I think HTTP 1.1 allows connection keep-alives so that you
only make one http call for the entire page. Right?
mf
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fennell, Mark P.
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Additionally, I think HTTP 1.1 allows connection keep-alives so
that you only make one http call
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] *On
Behalf Of *Fennell, Mark P.
*Sent:* Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:07 PM
*To:* discussion@acfug.org
*Subject:* RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Additionally, I think HTTP 1.1 allows
there and the end client browser
really for the most part doesn't care.
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fennell, Mark P.
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Additionally, I think HTTP 1.1
?
Josh
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Peavy
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:24 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Douglas, yep. You nailed it.
_
Derrick Peavy
Sales and Web Services
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Honestly, there's not really a benefit per se. There might be a rare case
now and then for doing this, but really you should probably just use the
filesystem for what it's design for, storing files.
John
_
From: [EMAIL
: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Not true--there can be a benefits: data management security. Derrick
started this whole discussion on the BlueDragon Interest list. I guess he
brought it here because no one could tell him a technique for doing what he
wanted on that list. But over there just
@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org
cc
Subject
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Right--so to be clear Derrick is looking to not use the img tag but to
instead use some other mechanism such that the image isn't a separate file
that is referenced (as is the case with the img tag) but is actually
: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I agree that with strict image security it is an option. Give an image
only to particular people, etc. But data management? I don't think so, but
let's just my opinion. Image security is probably the only practical
example I can think of for doing
*John Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/18/2007 02:49 PM Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org
To
discussion@acfug.org cc
Subject
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I agree that with strict image security it is an option. Give an image
only to particular people
you can implement all the same security you
: would for any other resource
your app serves up. : :
Josh: : From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Mason: Sent:
Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:27 AM:
To: discussion@acfug.org:
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image
f
Knudsen
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:13 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
in this case I'd suggest implementing J2EE container security. You can
secure any resource this way.
DK
On 1/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes and I've
to know
what to retrieve--that's the crucial difference between page furniture and
data. But whatever.
Josh
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:50 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
2007 2:50 PM:
To: discussion@acfug.org:
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image
from DB: : :
I agree that with strict image security it
is an option. Give an image only:
to particular people, etc. But data
management? I don't think so, but let's:
just my opinion. Image security is
probabl
to retrieve--that's
the crucial difference between page furniture and data. But
whatever.
Josh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:50 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I agree
: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
Just to be clear the security aspect is of no issue here. I am not
interested in doing this for security.
I agree with those who have posted about the con's of doing image
management in a DB. I don't want to do that.
What I specifically was trying
it.
As with most things, your needs and priorities will dictate your choice.
Josh
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mischa
Uppelschoten ext 10
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:38 PM
To: Web Site
Subject: re[2]: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB
I beg
26 matches
Mail list logo
