in the CF side.
Thanks for the feedback.
Paul
Morton
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cody WehuntSent:
Wednesday, June 07, 2006 9:07 PMTo:
discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able
Commerce
Paul
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006
11:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT:
Able Commerce
Paul,
Also keep in mind that the CF version is
fairly new compared to the Dot Net (old ASP) version. On a project I
worked on in the past I found it odd
Thanks Cam.
Paul Morton
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cameron
Childress
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:28 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce
Paul - Able Commerce was originally a CF only
Childress
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:28 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce
Paul - Able Commerce was originally a CF only product. It was
definitly first built in CF and them later ported to .NET (sometime
around 2001/2002?). However, I suspect
-Original Message-
From: Cody Wehunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:48 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce
Interesting, they told me it was the other way around. But maybe they were
referencing the MX version came after the .net
When Kevin Newling came out and presented it to ACFUG in 1999(?), it
was a CF-only product. Also, here's an article about it
http://cfdj.sys-con.com/read/41878.htm
-Cameron
On 6/8/06, Cody Wehunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting, they told me it was the other way around. But maybe
Title: Message
Iam
interestedin feedback on Able Commerce. I have a client that
is very interested in moving to that package, andwould welcome
yourthoughtson any support issues, performance, or implementation
issues.
Any thoughts on the
Dot Net version vs. the CFMX version would also be
: Leon Oosterwijk
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006
11:24 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT:
Able Commerce
Paul,
We run able
commerce here. (www.daveramsey.com/shop)
I've not used the .net (or jsp) versions but the cfmx works pretty well. we
Fax
770-974-8852
www.motorcyclecarbs.com
From: Leon
Oosterwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 11:24
AMTo:
discussion@acfug.orgSubject:
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce
Paul,
We run able
commerce here. (www.daveramsey.com
Title: Message
And agree a bit ridiculous if it is a
licensing error.
Cody
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Morton
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006
3:19 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT:
Able Commerce
I
in
functionality.
Cody
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Morton
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006
9:05 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able
Commerce
Iam interestedin feedback on Able
Commerce. I have a client that is very
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT:
Able Commerce
Paul,
We run able
commerce here. (www.daveramsey.com/shop)
I've not used the .net (or jsp) versions but the cfmx works pretty well. we had
some thread safety issues early on but those seems to all be resolved now. One
thing to keep in mind
12 matches
Mail list logo
