On 15/03/07, Alfred M. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The process is that there is a random chance of more freedom at the
end. You simply have no clue if these people will be able to liberate
these devices. You have no knowledge about these developers are
capable of. People have suggested
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 04:20 +0100, Andreas K. Foerster wrote:
Huh?
As far as I can remember there were plans to make a GNUbuntu...
What happened to that?
That was a plan by Canonical, however RMS would not give permission to
call it GNUbuntu for a variety of reasons and Mark Shuttleworth only
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 13:56 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
Also, I'd avoid Savannah and GNA for now, unless you know you are
happy with their policies (such as required early adoption of FDL,
or HTTPS-only).
Which are perfectly fine. Please refrain from spreading FUD. The
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 04:44:45PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Does or does not ftp.debian.org carry non-free software? Does or does
not ftp.gnu.org carry non-free software?
Clearly, the answer is `Yes. No'. You are jumping into the realm of
itsy bitsy semantics.
Nonsense. You're playing
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:29:46PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
In theory, anyone can go and make Linux a non-free program, since
it is simply impossible to enforce the license there.
I suggest you read http://gpl-violations.org/ in order to see where
the GPL has been
