Re: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:19:35PM -0600, jason whitt wrote: On your home router it shouldn't matter sarcasm whered you get a gig connection ran to your house?/sarcasm Actually I do have a GBit Ethernet connection to a pfSense (SunFire X2100 M2) at work, for about 600 EUR/month which is almost

Re: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:59:30AM +0100, Greg Hennessy wrote: If what I am reading above is correct, you've enabled it on a workstation and on the switch but not on the firewall ? IIRC WRAP NICs don't have jumbo fram support. It seems to be working, it must be fragmenting the oversized MTUs

Re: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Adam Armstrong
Greg Hennessy wrote: I've just switched to jumbo frames on the home network (enabled jumbo frames (mtu 9014) on NIC and one switch). I'm running a recentish (1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-05-11-2007) pfsense on WRAP, with mtu 1500 there (I don't think WRAP NICs can do jumbo frames). Should I run

Re: [pfSense-discussion] jumbo frames

2007-08-07 Thread Nick Buraglio
On 8/7/07, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 01:00:55PM +, Nick Buraglio wrote: Is there a reason you're running jumbo frames? If you're going to I need more performance on NFS and RDP (assuming, RDP can make use of jumbo frames -- I'm not sure, and the the

Re: [pfSense-discussion] acx100 and 1.2 beta

2007-08-07 Thread Paul M
Marius Schrecker wrote: Hi, I'm currently running 1.0.1 (developer) with the acx100 native driver from kewl.org which I compiled using the recommended patch. Works okay, but I remember it being quite a bit of work. What's the status on this driver in 1.2? Will it be built-in, or easier