David Lyon wrote:
I don't have a way of doing that right now - and am not aware of
practical examples that might require it.
Anything that can't be handled with the above will have to go into
a pre-install or post-install script and be coded with traditional
python coding.
Let's take a
Hey,
Reinout and I have worked on bugs related to zc.buildout support, and
it seems that now everything works fine.
Thanks for those who try it on their side !
So we will be shipping a 0.6.5 probably friday for that, and postpone
all the other issues for 0.6.6, except a few ones that are easy to
On 2009-10-15, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
buildouters, if you want to try the latest dev version you can grab :
http://python-distribute.org/bootstrap_dev.py
To make it explicit: grabbing this bootstrap and using it is safe for every
project. And it is the only change you need
Phillip,
I have a proposal for Distribute 0.7 : let's join forces and all work
together in that tool.
All would be the commiters of Distribute, and PJE. These people
would all be in the same team with the same commiter rights,
and I propose that you become the leader of that tool and guide us in
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
And if you agree, and want the project name,
... to be changed...
we can all find a neutral name that everybody would like.
___
Distutils-SIG maillist -
Hi there,
I've recently tried distribute, and much to my dismay found that it doesn't
appear to contain an equivalent of setup.py develop. Is such a thing
planned, or, even better, available now?
Thanks,
Andreas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:48:00 +0900, David Cournapeau
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote:
Let's take a common case: using cython/pyrex to accelerate some code,
but you still want people to be able to use your package without a C
compiler (bzr, cython are examples of such packages).
I believe
Andreas Klöckner kirjoitti:
Hi there,
I've recently tried distribute, and much to my dismay found that it doesn't
appear to contain an equivalent of setup.py develop. Is such a thing
planned, or, even better, available now?
You must be mistaken. Distribute definitely has such a command.
On Donnerstag 15 Oktober 2009, Andreas Klöckner wrote:
Hi there,
I've recently tried distribute, and much to my dismay found that it doesn't
appear to contain an equivalent of setup.py develop. Is such a thing
planned, or, even better, available now?
Ah, never mind. I had screwed up my
Andreas Klöckner kirjoitti:
On Donnerstag 15 Oktober 2009, Andreas Klöckner wrote:
Hi there,
I've recently tried distribute, and much to my dismay found that it doesn't
appear to contain an equivalent of setup.py develop. Is such a thing
planned, or, even better, available now?
Ah,
At 02:32 PM 10/15/2009 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
That would make us happy, because we would be able to work and
continue if you are not available sometimes without the feeling
that we are locked, and that would give you the manpower you miss to
develop some of your idea.
So... you've explained
that there are other people on the Distribute team who I'd
seriously consider as committers on setuptools or even as a chief
maintainer of the setuptools 0.6 line (if not more).
...asked me who those team members are
I'm asking. Who are they and, if you are willing to give them access,
Was just looking at the Distribute docs at
http://packages.python.org/distribute/index.html (nicely styled, btw).
Are there any other projects at http://packages.python.org/ (note,
that page actually doesn't even load)? What is the purpose of
packages.python.org , and how does one get their
On 2009-10-15, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
Was just looking at the Distribute docs at
http://packages.python.org/distribute/index.html (nicely styled, btw).
Are there any other projects at http://packages.python.org/ (note,
that page actually doesn't even load)? What is the purpose
At 02:38 PM 10/15/2009 -0400, sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
that there are other people on the Distribute team who I'd
seriously consider as committers on setuptools or even as a chief
maintainer of the setuptools 0.6 line (if not more).
...asked me who those team members are
I'm asking. Who
On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:55 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
[a whole bunch of stuff...]
Understood and I've observed the public portions of all of this. Much
of it has not been pretty.
Personality conflicts aside, I wonder if it would be possible to move
some portion of the base of both setuptools and
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, sstein...@gmail.com
sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:55 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
[a whole bunch of stuff...]
Understood and I've observed the public portions of all of this. Much of it
has not been pretty.
Personality conflicts aside, I wonder
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Michael Schurter
mich...@susens-schurter.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, sstein...@gmail.com
sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:55 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
[a whole bunch of stuff...]
Understood and I've observed the public portions of
Tarek is off to bed, so I'll throw out a quick mail to bring you all the happy
tiding that distribute 0.6.6 is out! So get ready for your
easy_install -U distribute.
Buildout users can grab http://python-distribute.org/bootstrap.py and get
their bin/buildout to use this stable 0.6.6. Works
And virtualenv-distribute was updated at the same time too.
Reinout van Rees a écrit :
Tarek is off to bed, so I'll throw out a quick mail to bring you all the happy
tiding that distribute 0.6.6 is out! So get ready for your
easy_install -U distribute.
Buildout users can grab
Warning: 3 part message.
It's all related so I decided to bundle it rather than starting
several new threads on the already over-burdened distutils list.
On Oct 15, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Now, ssteinerX, what do you mean exactly by shared foundation ?
Well, at the moment,
I really love this stuff..
It's better than soap opera..
We have jerks, interjectors, behind the scenes plots, secret messages,
moles and flashbacks..
I'm staying tuned in and hope tomorow's episode will be just as thrilling
as todays..
At 02:38 PM 10/15/2009 -0400, sstein...@gmail.com
David Lyon wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:48:00 +0900, David Cournapeau
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote:
Let's take a common case: using cython/pyrex to accelerate some code,
but you still want people to be able to use your package without a C
compiler (bzr, cython are examples of such
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:22:20 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
The problem is a bit more complicated, because it cannot be handled in
one single section.
I really appreciate you sharing this challenge with me.
I'm really convinced that I can tweak something to make it work. And
now is a really
David Lyon wrote:
You need to detect cython (configuration stage)
cython is a type of python interpretor? like jython or ironpython
Cython is a language which is more or less a subset of python, with
optional typing, and cython is the name of the Cython - C compiler. It
is one of the
25 matches
Mail list logo
