Chris Withers schrieb:
Fred Drake wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
setup()
...would get everyone from the static metadata file, while any keyword
parameters to setup would override the appropriate setting from the static
metadata file...
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:31:46 +0100, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
I think python setup.py install is so idiomatic that it seems silly to
break it for the sake of two lines of python. There's also an element of
explicit is better than implicit in the feel of actually running
New submission from Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com:
Trying to determine why pytz installed by easy_install was broken, I located the
following problem:
When setuptools extracts a tarball source dist to install it, it silently drops
any tar members which are neither files or directories. The problem
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:31:46AM +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
Chris Withers schrieb:
Fred Drake wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
setup()
...would get everyone from the static metadata file, while any keyword
parameters to setup
Hello Martin,
The Distutils-SIG mailing list is hosting several projects (4) which
all have their own trackers, and for some their own checking/bugs
mailing lists that receive these kind of automatic emails. This makes
it possible for the people that want to follow those warning e-mails
to
On behalf of the Distribute team, I am pleased to announce the 0.6.7
release of Distribute.
As usual, availabe at PyPI: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute
Most noticeable changes in 0.6.7 are:
- now the develop command supports the --user option, so it can use
the per-user site packages
Floris Bruynooghe schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:31:46AM +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
Chris Withers schrieb:
Fred Drake wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
setup()
...would get everyone from the static metadata file, while any
The Distutils-SIG mailing list is hosting several projects (4) which
all have their own trackers, and for some their own checking/bugs
mailing lists that receive these kind of automatic emails. This makes
it possible for the people that want to follow those warning e-mails
to register to
2009/11/1 Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
The Distutils-SIG mailing list is hosting several projects (4) which
all have their own trackers, and for some their own checking/bugs
mailing lists that receive these kind of automatic emails. This makes
it possible for the people that want to
I have no real clue what you are talking about. The message you've
copied is a roundup message from the setuptools tracker, not a warning
message of some kind.
Yes, that's a warning from the setuptools tracker. I call that a
warning because
it warns you that someone added an issue in the
2009/11/2 Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
[...]
Ah, ok. That meaning of warning was unknown to me, sorry.
That's my translation, so it might be wrong :)
[..]
It's actually Jeff Rush who is in charge of this tracker instance.
I can't change the setup without him agreeing.
So, Jeff,
At 12:01 AM 11/2/2009 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
It's actually Jeff Rush who is in charge of this tracker instance.
I can't change the setup without him agreeing.
So, Jeff, where else should the roundup instance for setuptools send
its notifications?
In over 1 year, there are now a grand
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com writes:
2009/11/2 Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
[...]
Ah, ok. That meaning of warning was unknown to me, sorry.
That's my translation, so it might be wrong :)
“Warning” implies the system is complaining something is wrong. The
arrival of a new
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:26:43 +, Floris Bruynooghe
Has anyone already suggested something like python -m setup install?
It would be rather similar and explicit, too.
Actually, I never came across that command line option and had no idea
that it even existed. But this is normal, because I
P.J. Eby wrote:
At 12:01 AM 11/2/2009 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
It's actually Jeff Rush who is in charge of this tracker instance.
I can't change the setup without him agreeing.
So, Jeff, where else should the roundup instance for setuptools send
its notifications?
In over 1 year,
Jeff Rush wrote:
I'm happy with the existing arrangement - I think sending low-traffic
bug reports to a separate list is a bad idea because few folk will
actually see them.
Agreed.
Any chance the mail subject could be prefixed with [setuptools] to make
it clear which tracker it came from?
Any chance the mail subject could be prefixed with [setuptools] to make
it clear which tracker it came from?
If you want to filter them out (or in a separate folder), I recommend to
set your filter for the X-Roundup-Name header.
Adding something to the subject is tricky, IIRC.
Regards,
Martin
17 matches
Mail list logo
