Due to the regression reported in [Setuptools #218](
https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/issue/218/setuppy-develop-fails-with-some-packages),
I've removed all versions of Setuptools 4.x and closed that branch.
I will continue to explore the underlying issue, [Setuptools #210](
On 2014-06-14 14:25:02 + (+), Jason R. Coombs wrote:
[...]
I’ve removed all versions of Setuptools 4.x and closed that
branch. [...] Please use Setuptools 3.8.1 or later.
[...]
Are most of the PyPI mirror tools out there smart enough to remove
packages which have been deleted from PyPI?
In article 20140614145331.ga1...@yuggoth.org,
Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2014-06-14 14:25:02 + (+), Jason R. Coombs wrote:
[...]
I’ve removed all versions of Setuptools 4.x and closed that
branch. [...] Please use Setuptools 3.8.1 or later.
[...]
Are most of the
A 5.0 has been released which resolves this.
On Jun 14, 2014, at 2:15 PM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
In article 20140614145331.ga1...@yuggoth.org,
Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2014-06-14 14:25:02 + (+), Jason R. Coombs wrote:
[...]
I’ve removed all versions of
Hi all,
Some time ago there was a movement towards deprecating MANIFEST.in and
adding directory support to setup()'s 'data_files'. Is there actually
something against implementing directory globs in 'data_files'?
I'm a little bit lost among current 'sdist' and 'bdist_rpm' options
regarding
Hey there,
I’m using python 2.7/setuptools 3.6 to build an egg of my code (checked into
perforce) using my setup.py. This egg gets installed into a virtualenv.
On osx/darwin this works fine.
On windows, the bdist creates scripts and data whose permissions are read-only
(attrib+r), and they
Hi folks. I'm new to the list and don't mean to impose, but I've been
following some of the recent developments of the PyPA and I'm wondering if
the unreasonable expectations I have for Python packaging are about to come
true, or if there's a simple workaround to achieve some of these goals in
the
On 12/06/2014 2:09 AM, Daniel Holth wrote:
This is in the bug tracker already. We need to add the py2-none-arch
tags etc. to Pip's list.
Thanks Daniel, can you please link me to the specific bug? I couldn't
find it in the pip issue tracker, but I could easily have been looking
wrong.
On 15 June 2014 10:25, lunasspe...@gmail.com lunasspe...@gmail.com wrote:
So my wish list for setuptools or a similar tool is:
*
Automated XDG menu entry generation
*
Some way to handle dependencies that can't be installed by pip
*
Automated generation of Debian binary packages good
