On 24/07/2014 17:44, Daniel Holth wrote:
Also, reject uploads that are not released under a DFSG license
What's a DFSG license
or lack
man pages.
Are you serious?
Chris
On Jul 24, 2014 11:57 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io
mailto:don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 24, 2014 at
On 25 Jul 2014 17:46, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
On 24/07/2014 17:44, Daniel Holth wrote:
Also, reject uploads that are not released under a DFSG license
What's a DFSG license
or lack
man pages.
Are you serious?
I took it as a sarcastic comment cryptically expressing
On July 25, 2014 at 4:36:17 AM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 25 Jul 2014 17:46, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
On 24/07/2014 17:44, Daniel Holth wrote:
Also, reject uploads that are not released under a DFSG license
What's a DFSG license
or lack
man pages.
[apologies for the terrible quoting, gmail's magic failed today]
On 24 July 2014 17:41, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 24, 2014 at 7:26:11 AM, Richard Jones (r1chardj0...@gmail.com)
wrote:
This PEP proposes a potentially confusing break for both users and
packagers. In
On 25 July 2014 23:13, Richard Jones r1chardj0...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, those are two solutions, another solution is for PyPI to allow
registering a namespace, like dstufft.* and companies simply name all their
packages that. This isn’t a unique problem to this PEP though. This problem
exists
Maybe we should get on the namespaces bandwagon and allow
organizations to register a prefix. Then you would be able to know
that dependencies called company/mysupersecretprogram would never
accidentally exist on pypi
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25
On 25 July 2014 15:21, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2014 23:13, Richard Jones r1chardj0...@gmail.com wrote:
A variation on the above two ideas is to just record the *link* to the
externally-hosted file from PyPI, rather than that file's content. It is
more error-prone,
On July 25, 2014 at 9:29:14 AM, Richard Jones (r1chardj0...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 25 July 2014 15:21, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2014 23:13, Richard Jones r1chardj0...@gmail.com wrote:
A variation on the above two ideas is to just record the *link* to the
externally-hosted
On 25 July 2014 23:34, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 9:29:14 AM, Richard Jones (r1chardj0...@gmail.com)
wrote:
On 25 July 2014 15:21, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2014 23:13, Richard Jones r1chardj0...@gmail.com wrote:
A variation on the
On July 25, 2014 at 9:43:28 AM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 25 July 2014 23:34, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 9:29:14 AM, Richard Jones (r1chardj0...@gmail.com)
wrote:
On 25 July 2014 15:21, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 9:43:28 AM, Nick Coghlan (ncogh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 25 July 2014 23:34, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 9:29:14 AM, Richard Jones (r1chardj0...@gmail.com)
wrote:
On 25
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a little something I cooked up based on the waf (a build
system) playground/package example. It's a build script for wheel
(what else) that builds a .whl for wheel when you run waf configure
and then waf package with
On July 25, 2014 at 10:03:01 AM, Daniel Holth (dho...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a little something I cooked up based on the waf (a build
system) playground/package example. It's a build script for wheel
(what else) that
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 10:03:01 AM, Daniel Holth (dho...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a little something I cooked up based on the waf (a build
system)
On Jul 25, 2014, at 08:46 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
Yea, I’m not sure whether I like it or not. Probably once we get a for real
build farm for PyPI setup that will be a pretty reasonable sized carrot for
people to upload sources.
That's really the right long-term approach, IMO. I'd like to some
On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 11:10 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Jul 25, 2014, at 08:46 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
Yea, I’m not sure whether I like it or not. Probably once we get a for real
build farm for PyPI setup that will be a pretty reasonable sized carrot for
people to upload sources.
On July 25, 2014 at 1:52:55 PM, John M. Anderson (son...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 11:10 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Jul 25, 2014, at 08:46 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
Yea, I’m not sure whether I like it or not. Probably once we get a for real
build farm for PyPI setup that will
Linux wheels are generally not compatible in a non-local sense, so it's
unlikely those will be distributable through PyPI. That would also mean
it's probably unlikely they'll be built there.
Something related to this also cane up in discussion at europython but I
don't want to steal any thunder
On July 25, 2014 at 2:37:58 PM, Richard Jones (r1chardj0...@gmail.com) wrote:
Linux wheels are generally not compatible in a non-local sense, so it's
unlikely those will be distributable through PyPI. That would also mean it's
probably unlikely they'll be built there.
Something related to this
On 25 Jul 2014, at 21:06, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 2:37:58 PM, Richard Jones (r1chardj0...@gmail.com) wrote:
Linux wheels are generally not compatible in a non-local sense, so it's
unlikely those will be distributable through PyPI. That would also mean it's
On July 25, 2014 at 3:42:48 PM, Wichert Akkerman (wich...@wiggy.net) wrote:
On 25 Jul 2014, at 21:06, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 2:37:58 PM, Richard Jones (r1chardj0...@gmail.com) wrote:
Linux wheels are generally not compatible in a non-local sense, so it's
On July 25, 2014 at 3:50:30 PM, Wichert Akkerman (wich...@wiggy.net) wrote:
On 25 Jul 2014, at 21:44, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 3:42:48 PM, Wichert Akkerman (wich...@wiggy.net) wrote:
On 25 Jul 2014, at 21:06, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25,
On 26 Jul 2014 05:56, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 3:50:30 PM, Wichert Akkerman (wich...@wiggy.net)
wrote:
Will that guarantee the OS-provided Python was used? Or is there still a
risk someone was using a custom compiled Python on an Ubuntu 14.04 system
that is not
On 2014-07-24 11:57:24 -0400 (-0400), Donald Stufft wrote:
This is gonna make openstack sad I think… They were relying on the
fact that pip prior to 1.4 didn’t install Wheels, and pip 1.4+ has
the pre-releases are excluded by default logic to publish
pre-releases safely to PyPI.
[...]
FWIW I
On 26 Jul 2014, at 00:08, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 Jul 2014 05:56, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On July 25, 2014 at 3:50:30 PM, Wichert Akkerman (wich...@wiggy.net) wrote:
Will that guarantee the OS-provided Python was used? Or is there still a
risk
25 matches
Mail list logo
