On Wed, Jul 11, 2018, at 7:32 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
> And yet you can see "License: ReportLab BSD Derived" in the left-hand
> column under "Meta," so how did it get there? Did PyPI previously fall
> back to including the "License" classifier value as is (even if
> invalid) if no "license"
> On Jul 11, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> Possibly PyPI is noticing that the file you're trying to upload is identical
> to the one that's already there and counting that as a "successful upload"?
Yes, if you try to upload the same file twice (same as in, the hashes match
PyPI is not the license police. You can specify any license you like in the
dedicated, free-form text, "license" field.
That's the "license" field. But, PyPI does require that values in the
"classifiers" field have to be taken from a known set. Among other things,
this prevents typos, and
Hi there Robin,
I'm going to try to reply in-line.
Sent from my phone with my typo-happy thumbs.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018, 11:17 Robin Becker wrote:
> After release of Python-3.7 I wanted to upload to pypi a newly built
> version of a C-extension which already has been migrated to
> the new site.
I think the issue here is not your use of the "license" field (though using the
classifier-like syntax there is dubious), but the fact that you are specifying
an invalid classifier. The valid classifiers are enumerated, you can find them
here: https://pypi.org/classifiers/
I think the
After release of Python-3.7 I wanted to upload to pypi a newly built version of a C-extension which already has been migrated to
the new site.
$ twine --version
twine version 1.11.0 (pkginfo: 1.4.2, requests: 2.18.1, setuptools: 36.2.0,
requests-toolbelt: 0.8.0, tqdm: 4.14.0)
$ twine upload
