Am 08.09.2017 um 14:54 schrieb Thomas Güttler:
It would be great, if I could install psutil without the need for a gcc on
linux.
The maintainer (Giampaolo Rodola) is interested, but the roadmap is not clear
yet.
He said:
> It's something which needs to be investigated. A quick Google search
I should've read this issue before responding:
https://github.com/giampaolo/psutil/issues/824
On Friday, September 8, 2017, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Wes Turner > wrote:
> > Is there a reason that psutil cannot be built as a manylinux1 wheel?
> >
> > - manyl
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Wes Turner wrote:
> Is there a reason that psutil cannot be built as a manylinux1 wheel?
>
> - manylinux1_x86_64
> - manylinux1_i686
Thomas can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he was looking for an
easy automated way to do this.
Cheers,
Matthew
Is there a reason that psutil cannot be built as a manylinux1 wheel?
- manylinux1_x86_64
- manylinux1_i686
On Friday, September 8, 2017, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Thomas Güttler
> > wrote:
> > It would be great, if I could install psutil without the need for
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Thomas Güttler
wrote:
> It would be great, if I could install psutil without the need for a gcc on
> linux.
>
> The maintainer (Giampaolo Rodola) is interested, but the roadmap is not
> clear yet.
>
> He said:
>
>> It's something which needs to be investigated.
It would be great, if I could install psutil without the need for a gcc on
linux.
The maintainer (Giampaolo Rodola) is interested, but the roadmap is not clear
yet.
He said:
> It's something which needs to be investigated. A quick Google searched
brought me here:
> https://github.com/joerick
