[Distutils] Re: Distlib vs Packaging (Was: disable building wheel fora package)

2018-09-21 Thread Bert JW Regeer
rosoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 > > > > From: Paul Moore <mailto:p.f.mo...@gmail.com> > Sent: 21 September 2018 20:16 > To: Nick Coghlan <mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com> > Cc: Michael Merickel <mailto:mmeri...@gmail.com>; Bert JW Regeer > <

[Distutils] Re: Distlib vs Packaging (Was: disable building wheel fora package)

2018-09-21 Thread Brett Cannon
> distinction Python packaging makes.) > > > > TP > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *Paul Moore > *Sent: *21 September 2018 20:16 > *To: *Nick Coghlan > *Cc: *Michael Me

[Distutils] Re: Distlib vs Packaging (Was: disable building wheel fora package)

2018-09-21 Thread Dan Ryan
AFAIK none of the pipenv maintainers have access to the Pipfile repo anyway besides Kenneth — We are maintaining a fork? Reimplementation? with additional validation Dan Ryan // pipenv maintainer gh: @techalchemy > On Sep 21, 2018, at 9:31 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at

[Distutils] Re: Distlib vs Packaging (Was: disable building wheel fora package)

2018-09-21 Thread Paul Moore
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 14:09, Tzu-ping Chung wrote: > On the other hand, there are many other application dependency management > tools out there, and as far as I know none of them actually have a lock file > format with interoperability. JavaScript, for example, has maybe the most >

[Distutils] Re: Distlib vs Packaging (Was: disable building wheel fora package)

2018-09-21 Thread Tzu-ping Chung
: Distlib vs Packaging (Was: disable building wheel fora package) On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 11:41, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 05:47, Donald Stufft wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2018, at 3:35 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > I don't think anyone's even spoken to the pip mainta