[Distutils] Specifying eggs and build manifest ?

Hi, I wonder if there is any interest in the current distribute effort to specify some low-level commonalities outside the distutils code for interoperation. In particular, I had two things in mind: 1 Formally specifying the egg format (and versioning it !) - or is egg format outside distribute

Re: [Distutils] Specifying eggs and build manifest ?

Just use buildout... On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:24:07 +0900, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I wonder if there is any interest in the current distribute effort to specify some low-level commonalities outside the distutils code for interoperation. In particular, I had two things

Re: [Distutils] Specifying eggs and build manifest ?

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:24 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I wonder if there is any interest in the current distribute effort to specify some low-level commonalities outside the distutils code for interoperation. In particular, I had two things in mind:  1 Formally

Re: [Distutils] Specifying eggs and build manifest ?

At 10:24 AM 12/22/2009 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: 1 Formally specifying the egg format (and versioning it !) - or is egg format outside distribute goal ? FYI: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EggFormats ___ Distutils-SIG maillist -

Re: [Distutils] Specifying eggs and build manifest ?

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:42 AM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote: At 10:24 AM 12/22/2009 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:  1 Formally specifying the egg format (and versioning it !) - or is egg format outside distribute goal ? FYI: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EggFormats I

Re: [Distutils] Specifying eggs and build manifest ?

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote: If you are referring to the installation format, Distribute wants to drop any extra format in the future and stick with a unique, standard format described in PEP 376 to avoid having an heterogeneous site-packages.