David Lyon david.l...@preisshare.net writes:
If you have a zip/archive file, you can put anything in it. No reason
why 'everything' can't go in it.
A L'Oeuf incredible might include a Python 2.x and Python 3.x code
set, make code for linux, .pyd for windows.
It would be so un-confusing to
Ben writes:
However, you're now talking about changing the package format, and not
the terminology of what we already have. So I'm dropping this
sub-thread.
ok - up to you. Don't talk about:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0376/
David
___
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Suno Ano suno@sunoano.org wrote:
John I would also add the common use of the term distribution to
John that glossary as well.
Yes, true that, at http://python.org/download/ we have *distributions*
to download.
I figure the definition for *Installer*
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Suno Ano suno@sunoano.org wrote:
John I would also add the common use of the term distribution to
John that glossary as well.
Yes, true that, at http://python.org/download/ we have *distributions*
to download.
I figure the definition for *Installer*
John I would also add the common use of the term distribution to
John that glossary as well.
Yes, true that, at http://python.org/download/ we have *distributions*
to download.
I figure the definition for *Installer* should then include that term
too. To summarize, we now have the terms
-
This quote is taken from the distutils thread current preferred way
to specify dependencies? future?,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a bit confused myself... PEP-345 says it
Brad Allen wrote:
This quote is taken from the distutils thread current preferred way
to specify dependencies? future?,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a bit confused myself...
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
[..]
Normally the word 'distribution' is reserved for what lands in the
'dist' directory, such as a tarball or an egg...right?
Right.
We should use the terminology as defined in
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
[..]
Normally the word 'distribution' is reserved for what lands in the
'dist' directory, such as a tarball or an egg...right?
Right.
We should use the terminology as defined in
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
[..]
We should use the terminology as defined in
http://docs.python.org/distutils/introduction.html#distutils-specific-terminology
So technically
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
The only inconsistency, I think, is that operating systems like Debian
refer to their software distributions as packages (as in, a packaged
up piece of software that you can download and install). Packages is
a great name
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
The only inconsistency, I think, is that operating systems like Debian
refer to their software distributions as packages (as in, a packaged
up piece
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:12 AM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
The only inconsistency, I think, is that operating systems like Debian
refer to
At 10:29 AM 1/7/2010 -0600, Brad Allen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:12 AM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
The only inconsistency, I think,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad Allen wrote:
This quote is taken from the distutils thread current preferred way
to specify dependencies? future?,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, John Gabriele
8614 *projects*, some of which have one or more *versions*, which in
turn may have one or more source or binary *distributions*.
Instead of version, I really like PyPI's term more: *releases*.
As for projects: fine with me; PyPI would then be the Python Project
Index.
Regards,
Martin
At 09:20 PM 1/7/2010 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
8614 *projects*, some of which have one or more *versions*, which in
turn may have one or more source or binary *distributions*.
Instead of version, I really like PyPI's term more: *releases*.
Not all versions are released versions, so I
Instead of version, I really like PyPI's term more: *releases*.
Not all versions are released versions
Actually, from a PyPI point of view, they are :-)
Regards,
Martin
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:40 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
As for projects: fine with me; PyPI would then be the Python Project
Index.
+1
If this gets general agreement, there are probably some places where
the word 'package' should be replaced with the word 'project', right?
For
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Brad Allen bradallen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:40 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
As for projects: fine with me; PyPI would then be the Python Project
Index.
+1
If this gets general agreement, there are probably some places
Brad Allen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:40 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
As for projects: fine with me; PyPI would then be the Python Project
Index.
+1
If this gets general agreement, there are probably some places where
the word 'package' should be replaced with the word
21 matches
Mail list logo
