Hi Jim,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Brad Allen bradallen...@gmail.com wrote:
Today I was informed of an issue in which buildout (with the latest
setuptools) is not resolving version numbers properly, causing the
wrong
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
Hi Jim,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Brad Allen bradallen...@gmail.com wrote:
Today I was informed of an issue in which buildout (with the latest
setuptools)
At 11:42 AM 3/12/2010 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:13 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 12:38 PM 3/11/2010 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
If _ is a valid project_name identifier, why it is replaces
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Brad Allen bradallen...@gmail.com wrote:
Today I was informed of an issue in which buildout (with the latest
setuptools) is not resolving version numbers properly, causing the
wrong package to be selected in some cases. The cause identified was
having '_' in the
At 12:38 PM 3/11/2010 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
If _ is a valid project_name identifier, why it is replaces with - ?
In order to have a canonicalized name form which can be escaped in
filenames for unambiguous identification of
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:54 AM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 03:03 PM 3/9/2010 -0600, Brad Allen wrote:
Today I was informed of an issue in which buildout (with the latest
setuptools) is not resolving version numbers properly, causing the
wrong package to be selected in some
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:13 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 12:38 PM 3/11/2010 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
If _ is a valid project_name identifier, why it is replaces with - ?
In order to have a canonicalized name
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:24 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
As you can see, these APIs work just fine, so the example given is a red
herring, unless Buildout is using the APIs incorrectly (which I really doubt
it is).
Based on Baiju's input above describing buildout's use of
At 09:50 AM 3/10/2010 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
I spend some time with Buildout and setuptools code to identify the issue.
I will try to explain my findings.
1. Buildout is relying on pkg_resources.Requirement.parse function to
get the project_name like this:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:09 AM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 09:50 AM 3/10/2010 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
I spend some time with Buildout and setuptools code to identify the issue.
I will try to explain my findings.
1. Buildout is relying on pkg_resources.Requirement.parse
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:09 AM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 09:50 AM 3/10/2010 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
I spend some time with Buildout and setuptools code to identify the issue.
I will try to explain my
At 03:03 PM 3/9/2010 -0600, Brad Allen wrote:
Today I was informed of an issue in which buildout (with the latest
setuptools) is not resolving version numbers properly, causing the
wrong package to be selected in some cases. The cause identified was
having '_' in the package name.
I suspect
Thanks, that helps a lot.
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
13 matches
Mail list logo
